Cargando…

Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessment in outdoor and extensive systems has rarely been investigated, and little is known about the most appropriate indicators. This study aimed at compiling a list of animal-based measures of welfare for domestic ruminants raised on outdoor/extensive systems by means of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spigarelli, Chiara, Zuliani, Anna, Battini, Monica, Mattiello, Silvana, Bovolenta, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10040609
_version_ 1783533659289026560
author Spigarelli, Chiara
Zuliani, Anna
Battini, Monica
Mattiello, Silvana
Bovolenta, Stefano
author_facet Spigarelli, Chiara
Zuliani, Anna
Battini, Monica
Mattiello, Silvana
Bovolenta, Stefano
author_sort Spigarelli, Chiara
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessment in outdoor and extensive systems has rarely been investigated, and little is known about the most appropriate indicators. This study aimed at compiling a list of animal-based measures of welfare for domestic ruminants raised on outdoor/extensive systems by means of a systematic review. Out of 810 papers retrieved, 52 matched the inclusion criteria and went through an in-depth analysis. According to available literature, 45 indicators have been used to assess welfare on pasture, often following different methodologies. Most indicators were measured by observers even if the use of sensor technologies increased in recent years. Considering the growing interest in pasture-based or grass-fed products, it is suggested that welfare assessment in outdoor/extensive farming systems is carried out by following shared methodologies in order to provide evidence of the higher animal welfare claims that these products often imply compared to indoor systems. ABSTRACT: Outdoor and extensive farming systems allow animals to behave in a natural way and are often perceived as welfare friendly. Nonetheless, the natural environment poses multiple challenges to the welfare of animals, sometimes hampering their capacity to cope. Welfare assessment in outdoor and extensive systems has been rarely investigated, and little is known about the most appropriate indicators. The aim of this review was to identify animal-based measures of welfare to apply in extensive and pasture-based systems in domestic ruminants. Through the use of a dedicated software for systematic reviews, 810 papers were screened and a total of 52 papers were retained for in-depth analysis. ABM resulting from these papers were initially divided according to the species (cattle and small ruminants, including sheep and goats) and then to four principles: comfort, behavior, feeding and health. The results showed that welfare data were collected applying different methodologies, with an increasing use of sensors in recent years. The need to herd and restrain animals for individual data collection is one of the major constraints to data collection in extensive farming systems. It is suggested that welfare assessment in outdoor/extensive farming systems is carried out by following shared procedures in order to provide evidence of the higher animal welfare claims that these products often imply compared to indoor systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7222824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72228242020-05-18 Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants Spigarelli, Chiara Zuliani, Anna Battini, Monica Mattiello, Silvana Bovolenta, Stefano Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Welfare assessment in outdoor and extensive systems has rarely been investigated, and little is known about the most appropriate indicators. This study aimed at compiling a list of animal-based measures of welfare for domestic ruminants raised on outdoor/extensive systems by means of a systematic review. Out of 810 papers retrieved, 52 matched the inclusion criteria and went through an in-depth analysis. According to available literature, 45 indicators have been used to assess welfare on pasture, often following different methodologies. Most indicators were measured by observers even if the use of sensor technologies increased in recent years. Considering the growing interest in pasture-based or grass-fed products, it is suggested that welfare assessment in outdoor/extensive farming systems is carried out by following shared methodologies in order to provide evidence of the higher animal welfare claims that these products often imply compared to indoor systems. ABSTRACT: Outdoor and extensive farming systems allow animals to behave in a natural way and are often perceived as welfare friendly. Nonetheless, the natural environment poses multiple challenges to the welfare of animals, sometimes hampering their capacity to cope. Welfare assessment in outdoor and extensive systems has been rarely investigated, and little is known about the most appropriate indicators. The aim of this review was to identify animal-based measures of welfare to apply in extensive and pasture-based systems in domestic ruminants. Through the use of a dedicated software for systematic reviews, 810 papers were screened and a total of 52 papers were retained for in-depth analysis. ABM resulting from these papers were initially divided according to the species (cattle and small ruminants, including sheep and goats) and then to four principles: comfort, behavior, feeding and health. The results showed that welfare data were collected applying different methodologies, with an increasing use of sensors in recent years. The need to herd and restrain animals for individual data collection is one of the major constraints to data collection in extensive farming systems. It is suggested that welfare assessment in outdoor/extensive farming systems is carried out by following shared procedures in order to provide evidence of the higher animal welfare claims that these products often imply compared to indoor systems. MDPI 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7222824/ /pubmed/32252331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10040609 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Spigarelli, Chiara
Zuliani, Anna
Battini, Monica
Mattiello, Silvana
Bovolenta, Stefano
Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title_full Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title_fullStr Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title_short Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
title_sort welfare assessment on pasture: a review on animal-based measures for ruminants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10040609
work_keys_str_mv AT spigarellichiara welfareassessmentonpastureareviewonanimalbasedmeasuresforruminants
AT zulianianna welfareassessmentonpastureareviewonanimalbasedmeasuresforruminants
AT battinimonica welfareassessmentonpastureareviewonanimalbasedmeasuresforruminants
AT mattiellosilvana welfareassessmentonpastureareviewonanimalbasedmeasuresforruminants
AT bovolentastefano welfareassessmentonpastureareviewonanimalbasedmeasuresforruminants