Cargando…

Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial

Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruszkai, Zoltán, Kiss, Erika, László, Ildikó, Bokrétás, Gergely Péter, Vizserálek, Dóra, Vámossy, Ildikó, Surány, Erika, Buzogány, István, Bajory, Zoltán, Molnár, Zsolt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00519-6
_version_ 1783533672165539840
author Ruszkai, Zoltán
Kiss, Erika
László, Ildikó
Bokrétás, Gergely Péter
Vizserálek, Dóra
Vámossy, Ildikó
Surány, Erika
Buzogány, István
Bajory, Zoltán
Molnár, Zsolt
author_facet Ruszkai, Zoltán
Kiss, Erika
László, Ildikó
Bokrétás, Gergely Péter
Vizserálek, Dóra
Vámossy, Ildikó
Surány, Erika
Buzogány, István
Bajory, Zoltán
Molnár, Zsolt
author_sort Ruszkai, Zoltán
collection PubMed
description Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8–14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7222900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72229002020-05-15 Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial Ruszkai, Zoltán Kiss, Erika László, Ildikó Bokrétás, Gergely Péter Vizserálek, Dóra Vámossy, Ildikó Surány, Erika Buzogány, István Bajory, Zoltán Molnár, Zsolt J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8–14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409. Springer Netherlands 2020-05-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7222900/ /pubmed/32388650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00519-6 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ruszkai, Zoltán
Kiss, Erika
László, Ildikó
Bokrétás, Gergely Péter
Vizserálek, Dóra
Vámossy, Ildikó
Surány, Erika
Buzogány, István
Bajory, Zoltán
Molnár, Zsolt
Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00519-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ruszkaizoltan effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kisserika effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laszloildiko effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bokretasgergelypeter effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vizseralekdora effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vamossyildiko effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suranyerika effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT buzoganyistvan effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bajoryzoltan effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molnarzsolt effectsofintraoperativepositiveendexpiratorypressureoptimizationonrespiratorymechanicsandtheinflammatoryresponsearandomizedcontrolledtrial