Cargando…

Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most common bariatric operations. With the implementation of enhanced recovery protocols, the use of drains should decrease. METHODS: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clapp, Benjamin, Lodeiro, Carlos, Dodoo, Christopher, Coleman, Ginger, Sadri, Babak, Wicker, Ellen, Swinney, Ira L., Cullen, Robert, Tyroch, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31654344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6
_version_ 1783533699425370112
author Clapp, Benjamin
Lodeiro, Carlos
Dodoo, Christopher
Coleman, Ginger
Sadri, Babak
Wicker, Ellen
Swinney, Ira L.
Cullen, Robert
Tyroch, Alan
author_facet Clapp, Benjamin
Lodeiro, Carlos
Dodoo, Christopher
Coleman, Ginger
Sadri, Babak
Wicker, Ellen
Swinney, Ira L.
Cullen, Robert
Tyroch, Alan
author_sort Clapp, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most common bariatric operations. With the implementation of enhanced recovery protocols, the use of drains should decrease. METHODS: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was queried for the years 2015–2017. Our inclusion criteria included all patients undergoing a primary LRYGB, SG, and revisions. We examined demographics, operative characteristics, the use of drains, and postoperative complications. Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. Student’s T test (Wilcoxon sum rank test in the case of skewed data) and chi-squared analysis were used to assess the baseline differences in drain utilization. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2017, there were 388,239 bariatric cases performed without drains and 100,221 performed with drains. Twenty-nine percent of LRYGB patients had a drain placed but only 16.7% of SG patients. The percentage of LRYGB that had a drain dropped from 33.1 to 24.6% during the study period and that of SG dropped from 20.3 to 13.6%. Patients that had drains placed were more likely to have a provocative test at the time of surgery (prevalence ratio (PR) 2.24) and to have a postoperative swallow study (PR 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Drains are still commonly used in bariatric patients. Over the study period, there was a decrease in the use of drains in both bypass and sleeve patients. Patients with a drain were more likely to have had a provocative test and a swallow study and have a higher rate of complications and mortality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72231062020-05-15 Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017 Clapp, Benjamin Lodeiro, Carlos Dodoo, Christopher Coleman, Ginger Sadri, Babak Wicker, Ellen Swinney, Ira L. Cullen, Robert Tyroch, Alan Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most common bariatric operations. With the implementation of enhanced recovery protocols, the use of drains should decrease. METHODS: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was queried for the years 2015–2017. Our inclusion criteria included all patients undergoing a primary LRYGB, SG, and revisions. We examined demographics, operative characteristics, the use of drains, and postoperative complications. Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. Student’s T test (Wilcoxon sum rank test in the case of skewed data) and chi-squared analysis were used to assess the baseline differences in drain utilization. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2017, there were 388,239 bariatric cases performed without drains and 100,221 performed with drains. Twenty-nine percent of LRYGB patients had a drain placed but only 16.7% of SG patients. The percentage of LRYGB that had a drain dropped from 33.1 to 24.6% during the study period and that of SG dropped from 20.3 to 13.6%. Patients that had drains placed were more likely to have a provocative test at the time of surgery (prevalence ratio (PR) 2.24) and to have a postoperative swallow study (PR 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Drains are still commonly used in bariatric patients. Over the study period, there was a decrease in the use of drains in both bypass and sleeve patients. Patients with a drain were more likely to have had a provocative test and a swallow study and have a higher rate of complications and mortality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-10-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223106/ /pubmed/31654344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Clapp, Benjamin
Lodeiro, Carlos
Dodoo, Christopher
Coleman, Ginger
Sadri, Babak
Wicker, Ellen
Swinney, Ira L.
Cullen, Robert
Tyroch, Alan
Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title_full Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title_fullStr Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title_short Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015–2017
title_sort trends in drain utilization in bariatric surgery: an analysis of the mbsaqip database 2015–2017
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31654344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6
work_keys_str_mv AT clappbenjamin trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT lodeirocarlos trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT dodoochristopher trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT colemanginger trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT sadribabak trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT wickerellen trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT swinneyiral trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT cullenrobert trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017
AT tyrochalan trendsindrainutilizationinbariatricsurgeryananalysisofthembsaqipdatabase20152017