Cargando…

Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks

OBJECTIVES: Neck pain commonly accompanies recurrent headaches such as migraine, tension-type and cervicogenic headache. Neck pain may be part of the headache symptom complex or a local source. Patients commonly seek neck treatment to alleviate headache, but this is only indicated when cervical musc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getsoian, Scott L, Gulati, Surendra M, Okpareke, Ikenna, Nee, Robert J, Jull, Gwendolen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32376753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035245
_version_ 1783533704903131136
author Getsoian, Scott L
Gulati, Surendra M
Okpareke, Ikenna
Nee, Robert J
Jull, Gwendolen A
author_facet Getsoian, Scott L
Gulati, Surendra M
Okpareke, Ikenna
Nee, Robert J
Jull, Gwendolen A
author_sort Getsoian, Scott L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Neck pain commonly accompanies recurrent headaches such as migraine, tension-type and cervicogenic headache. Neck pain may be part of the headache symptom complex or a local source. Patients commonly seek neck treatment to alleviate headache, but this is only indicated when cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction is the source of pain. Clinical presentation of reduced cervical extension, painful cervical joint dysfunction and impaired muscle function collectively has been shown to identify cervicogenic headache among patients with recurrent headaches. The pattern’s validity has not been tested against the ‘gold standard’ of controlled diagnostic blocks. This study assessed the validity of this pattern of cervical musculoskeletal signs to identify a cervical source of headache and neck pain, against controlled diagnostic blocks, in patients with headache and neck pain. DESIGN: Prospective concurrent validity study that employed a diagnostic model building approach to analysis. SETTING: Hospital-based multidisciplinary outpatient clinic in Joliet, Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of participants who presented to a headache clinic with recurrent headaches associated with neck pain. Sixty participants were enrolled and thirty were included in the analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants underwent a clinical examination consisting of relevant tests of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction. Controlled diagnostic blocks of C2/C3–C3/C4 established a cervical source of neck pain. Penalised logistic regression identified clinical signs to be included in a diagnostic model that best predicted participants’ responses to diagnostic blocks. RESULTS: Ten of thirty participants responded to diagnostic blocks. The full pattern of cervical musculoskeletal signs best predicted participants’ responses (expected prediction error = 0.57) and accounted for 65% of the variance in responses. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the validity of the musculoskeletal pattern to identify a cervical source of headache and neck pain. Adopting this criterion pattern may strengthen cervicogenic headache diagnosis and inform differential diagnosis of neck pain accompanying migraine and tension-type headache.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72231432020-05-15 Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks Getsoian, Scott L Gulati, Surendra M Okpareke, Ikenna Nee, Robert J Jull, Gwendolen A BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVES: Neck pain commonly accompanies recurrent headaches such as migraine, tension-type and cervicogenic headache. Neck pain may be part of the headache symptom complex or a local source. Patients commonly seek neck treatment to alleviate headache, but this is only indicated when cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction is the source of pain. Clinical presentation of reduced cervical extension, painful cervical joint dysfunction and impaired muscle function collectively has been shown to identify cervicogenic headache among patients with recurrent headaches. The pattern’s validity has not been tested against the ‘gold standard’ of controlled diagnostic blocks. This study assessed the validity of this pattern of cervical musculoskeletal signs to identify a cervical source of headache and neck pain, against controlled diagnostic blocks, in patients with headache and neck pain. DESIGN: Prospective concurrent validity study that employed a diagnostic model building approach to analysis. SETTING: Hospital-based multidisciplinary outpatient clinic in Joliet, Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of participants who presented to a headache clinic with recurrent headaches associated with neck pain. Sixty participants were enrolled and thirty were included in the analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants underwent a clinical examination consisting of relevant tests of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction. Controlled diagnostic blocks of C2/C3–C3/C4 established a cervical source of neck pain. Penalised logistic regression identified clinical signs to be included in a diagnostic model that best predicted participants’ responses to diagnostic blocks. RESULTS: Ten of thirty participants responded to diagnostic blocks. The full pattern of cervical musculoskeletal signs best predicted participants’ responses (expected prediction error = 0.57) and accounted for 65% of the variance in responses. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the validity of the musculoskeletal pattern to identify a cervical source of headache and neck pain. Adopting this criterion pattern may strengthen cervicogenic headache diagnosis and inform differential diagnosis of neck pain accompanying migraine and tension-type headache. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7223143/ /pubmed/32376753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035245 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurology
Getsoian, Scott L
Gulati, Surendra M
Okpareke, Ikenna
Nee, Robert J
Jull, Gwendolen A
Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title_full Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title_fullStr Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title_short Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
title_sort validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32376753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035245
work_keys_str_mv AT getsoianscottl validationofaclinicalexaminationtodifferentiateacervicogenicsourceofheadacheadiagnosticpredictionmodelusingcontrolleddiagnosticblocks
AT gulatisurendram validationofaclinicalexaminationtodifferentiateacervicogenicsourceofheadacheadiagnosticpredictionmodelusingcontrolleddiagnosticblocks
AT okparekeikenna validationofaclinicalexaminationtodifferentiateacervicogenicsourceofheadacheadiagnosticpredictionmodelusingcontrolleddiagnosticblocks
AT neerobertj validationofaclinicalexaminationtodifferentiateacervicogenicsourceofheadacheadiagnosticpredictionmodelusingcontrolleddiagnosticblocks
AT jullgwendolena validationofaclinicalexaminationtodifferentiateacervicogenicsourceofheadacheadiagnosticpredictionmodelusingcontrolleddiagnosticblocks