Cargando…
How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people
OBJECTIVES: To inform suicide prevention policies and responses to youths at risk by investigating whether suicide risk is predicted by a summary measure of common mental distress (CMD (the p factor)) as well as by conventional psychopathological domains; to define the distribution of suicide risks...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032494 |
_version_ | 1783533705373941760 |
---|---|
author | Polek, Ela Neufeld, Sharon A S Wilkinson, Paul Goodyer, Ian St Clair, Michelle Prabhu, Gita Dolan, Ray Bullmore, Edward T Fonagy, Peter Stochl, Jan Jones, Peter B |
author_facet | Polek, Ela Neufeld, Sharon A S Wilkinson, Paul Goodyer, Ian St Clair, Michelle Prabhu, Gita Dolan, Ray Bullmore, Edward T Fonagy, Peter Stochl, Jan Jones, Peter B |
author_sort | Polek, Ela |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To inform suicide prevention policies and responses to youths at risk by investigating whether suicide risk is predicted by a summary measure of common mental distress (CMD (the p factor)) as well as by conventional psychopathological domains; to define the distribution of suicide risks over the population range of CMD; to test whether such distress mediates the medium-term persistence of suicide risks. DESIGN: Two independent population-based cohorts. SETTING: Population based in two UK centres. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers aged 14–24 years recruited from primary healthcare registers, schools and colleges, with advertisements to complete quotas in age-sex-strata. Cohort 1 is the Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network (n=2403); cohort 2 is the ROOTS sample (n=1074). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Suicidal thoughts (ST) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). RESULTS: We calculated a CMD score using confirmatory bifactor analysis and then used logistic regressions to determine adjusted associations between risks and CMD; curve fitting was used to examine the relative prevalence of STs and NSSI over the population distribution of CMD. We found a dose–response relationship between levels of CMD and risk of suicide. The majority of all subjects experiencing ST and NSSI (78% and 76% in cohort 1, and 66% and 71% in cohort 2) had CMD scores no more than 2 SDs above the population mean; higher scores indicated the highest risk but were, by definition, infrequent. Pathway mediation models showed that CMD mediated the longitudinal course of both ST and NSSI. CONCLUSIONS: NSSI and ST in youths reflect CMD that also mediates their persistence. Universal prevention strategies reducing levels of CMD in the whole population without recourse to screening or measurement may prevent more suicides than approaches targeting youths with the most severe distress or with psychiatric disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72231452020-05-15 How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people Polek, Ela Neufeld, Sharon A S Wilkinson, Paul Goodyer, Ian St Clair, Michelle Prabhu, Gita Dolan, Ray Bullmore, Edward T Fonagy, Peter Stochl, Jan Jones, Peter B BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To inform suicide prevention policies and responses to youths at risk by investigating whether suicide risk is predicted by a summary measure of common mental distress (CMD (the p factor)) as well as by conventional psychopathological domains; to define the distribution of suicide risks over the population range of CMD; to test whether such distress mediates the medium-term persistence of suicide risks. DESIGN: Two independent population-based cohorts. SETTING: Population based in two UK centres. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers aged 14–24 years recruited from primary healthcare registers, schools and colleges, with advertisements to complete quotas in age-sex-strata. Cohort 1 is the Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network (n=2403); cohort 2 is the ROOTS sample (n=1074). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Suicidal thoughts (ST) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). RESULTS: We calculated a CMD score using confirmatory bifactor analysis and then used logistic regressions to determine adjusted associations between risks and CMD; curve fitting was used to examine the relative prevalence of STs and NSSI over the population distribution of CMD. We found a dose–response relationship between levels of CMD and risk of suicide. The majority of all subjects experiencing ST and NSSI (78% and 76% in cohort 1, and 66% and 71% in cohort 2) had CMD scores no more than 2 SDs above the population mean; higher scores indicated the highest risk but were, by definition, infrequent. Pathway mediation models showed that CMD mediated the longitudinal course of both ST and NSSI. CONCLUSIONS: NSSI and ST in youths reflect CMD that also mediates their persistence. Universal prevention strategies reducing levels of CMD in the whole population without recourse to screening or measurement may prevent more suicides than approaches targeting youths with the most severe distress or with psychiatric disorders. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7223145/ /pubmed/32398331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032494 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Polek, Ela Neufeld, Sharon A S Wilkinson, Paul Goodyer, Ian St Clair, Michelle Prabhu, Gita Dolan, Ray Bullmore, Edward T Fonagy, Peter Stochl, Jan Jones, Peter B How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title | How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title_full | How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title_fullStr | How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title_full_unstemmed | How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title_short | How do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? Observational analyses replicated in two independent UK cohorts of young people |
title_sort | how do the prevalence and relative risk of non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts vary across the population distribution of common mental distress (the p factor)? observational analyses replicated in two independent uk cohorts of young people |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polekela howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT neufeldsharonas howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT wilkinsonpaul howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT goodyerian howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT stclairmichelle howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT prabhugita howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT dolanray howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT bullmoreedwardt howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT fonagypeter howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT stochljan howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople AT jonespeterb howdotheprevalenceandrelativeriskofnonsuicidalselfinjuryandsuicidalthoughtsvaryacrossthepopulationdistributionofcommonmentaldistressthepfactorobservationalanalysesreplicatedintwoindependentukcohortsofyoungpeople |