Cargando…

Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to refine the measurement of appropriate emergency department (ED) use and to provide a natural observation of appropriate ED use rates based on professional versus patient perspectives. SETTING: Taiwan has a population of 23 million, with one single-payer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chih-Yuan, Lee, Yue-Chune
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033833
_version_ 1783533706531569664
author Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Yue-Chune
author_facet Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Yue-Chune
author_sort Lin, Chih-Yuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to refine the measurement of appropriate emergency department (ED) use and to provide a natural observation of appropriate ED use rates based on professional versus patient perspectives. SETTING: Taiwan has a population of 23 million, with one single-payer universal health insurance scheme. Taiwan has no limitations on ED use, and a low barrier to ED use may be a surrogate for natural observation of users’ perspectives in ED use. PARTICIPANTS: In 7 years, there were 1 835 860 ED visits from one million random samples of the National Health Insurance Database. MEASURES: Appropriate ED use was determined according to professional standards, measured by the modified Billings New York University Emergency Department (NYU-ED) algorithm, and further analysed after the addition of prudent patient standards, measured by explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to reflect the performance of appropriate ED use measures, and sensitivity analyses were conducted using different thresholds to determine the appropriateness of ED use. The generalised estimating equation model was used to measure the associations between appropriate ED use based on process and outcome criteria and covariates including sex, age, occupation, health status, place of residence, medical resources area, date and income level. RESULTS: Appropriate ED use based on professional criteria was 33.5%, which increased to 63.1% when patient criteria were added. The AUC, which combines both professional and patient criteria, was high (0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate ED use rate nearly doubled when patient criteria were added to professional criteria. Explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria may be used as a supplementary measure to the implicit modified Billings NYU-ED algorithm when determining appropriate ED use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72231502020-05-15 Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan Lin, Chih-Yuan Lee, Yue-Chune BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to refine the measurement of appropriate emergency department (ED) use and to provide a natural observation of appropriate ED use rates based on professional versus patient perspectives. SETTING: Taiwan has a population of 23 million, with one single-payer universal health insurance scheme. Taiwan has no limitations on ED use, and a low barrier to ED use may be a surrogate for natural observation of users’ perspectives in ED use. PARTICIPANTS: In 7 years, there were 1 835 860 ED visits from one million random samples of the National Health Insurance Database. MEASURES: Appropriate ED use was determined according to professional standards, measured by the modified Billings New York University Emergency Department (NYU-ED) algorithm, and further analysed after the addition of prudent patient standards, measured by explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to reflect the performance of appropriate ED use measures, and sensitivity analyses were conducted using different thresholds to determine the appropriateness of ED use. The generalised estimating equation model was used to measure the associations between appropriate ED use based on process and outcome criteria and covariates including sex, age, occupation, health status, place of residence, medical resources area, date and income level. RESULTS: Appropriate ED use based on professional criteria was 33.5%, which increased to 63.1% when patient criteria were added. The AUC, which combines both professional and patient criteria, was high (0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate ED use rate nearly doubled when patient criteria were added to professional criteria. Explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria may be used as a supplementary measure to the implicit modified Billings NYU-ED algorithm when determining appropriate ED use. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7223150/ /pubmed/32398332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033833 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Yue-Chune
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title_full Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title_fullStr Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title_short Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
title_sort appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in taiwan
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033833
work_keys_str_mv AT linchihyuan appropriatenessofemergencycareusearetrospectiveobservationalstudybasedonprofessionalversuspatientsperspectivesintaiwan
AT leeyuechune appropriatenessofemergencycareusearetrospectiveobservationalstudybasedonprofessionalversuspatientsperspectivesintaiwan