Cargando…
Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Defecation dysfunction (DD) is one of the most common complications following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. And there is no effective treatment of DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Although some studies suggested that acupuncture and moxibustion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034152 |
_version_ | 1783533707940855808 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Guixing Xiao, Qiwei Lei, Hanzhou Fu, Yanan Kong, Jing Zheng, Qianhua Zhao, Ling Liang, Fanrong |
author_facet | Xu, Guixing Xiao, Qiwei Lei, Hanzhou Fu, Yanan Kong, Jing Zheng, Qianhua Zhao, Ling Liang, Fanrong |
author_sort | Xu, Guixing |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Defecation dysfunction (DD) is one of the most common complications following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. And there is no effective treatment of DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Although some studies suggested that acupuncture and moxibustion (AM) is effective and safe for DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, lacking strong evidence, for instance, the relevant systematic review, meta-analysis and randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a large, multicentre sample, makes the effects and safety remain uncertain. The present protocol is described for a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety of AM for DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search nine online databases from inception to 1 October 2019; the language of included trials will not be restricted. This study will include RCTs that performed AM as the main method of the experimental group for patients with DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Two of the researchers will independently select the studies, conduct risk of bias assessment and extract the data. We will use the fixed-effects model or random-effects model of RevMan V.5.2 software to analyse data synthesis. The risk ratios with 95% CIs and weighted mean differences or standardised mean differences with 95% CIs will be used to present the data synthesis outcome of dichotomous data respectively and the continuous data. Evidence quality of outcome will be assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required in this secondary research evidence, and we will publish the results of this study in a journal or concerned conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140097. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72231562020-05-15 Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Guixing Xiao, Qiwei Lei, Hanzhou Fu, Yanan Kong, Jing Zheng, Qianhua Zhao, Ling Liang, Fanrong BMJ Open Complementary Medicine INTRODUCTION: Defecation dysfunction (DD) is one of the most common complications following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. And there is no effective treatment of DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Although some studies suggested that acupuncture and moxibustion (AM) is effective and safe for DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, lacking strong evidence, for instance, the relevant systematic review, meta-analysis and randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a large, multicentre sample, makes the effects and safety remain uncertain. The present protocol is described for a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety of AM for DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search nine online databases from inception to 1 October 2019; the language of included trials will not be restricted. This study will include RCTs that performed AM as the main method of the experimental group for patients with DD after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Two of the researchers will independently select the studies, conduct risk of bias assessment and extract the data. We will use the fixed-effects model or random-effects model of RevMan V.5.2 software to analyse data synthesis. The risk ratios with 95% CIs and weighted mean differences or standardised mean differences with 95% CIs will be used to present the data synthesis outcome of dichotomous data respectively and the continuous data. Evidence quality of outcome will be assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required in this secondary research evidence, and we will publish the results of this study in a journal or concerned conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140097. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7223156/ /pubmed/32381535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034152 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Complementary Medicine Xu, Guixing Xiao, Qiwei Lei, Hanzhou Fu, Yanan Kong, Jing Zheng, Qianhua Zhao, Ling Liang, Fanrong Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for defecation dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Complementary Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuguixing effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaoqiwei effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leihanzhou effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fuyanan effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kongjing effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengqianhua effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaoling effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liangfanrong effectivenessandsafetyofacupunctureandmoxibustionfordefecationdysfunctionaftersphincterpreservingsurgeryforrectalcancerprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |