Cargando…
Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7 |
_version_ | 1783533721745358848 |
---|---|
author | Gogna, S. Latifi, R. Policastro, A. Prabhakaran, K. Anderson, P. Con, J. Choi, J. Samson, D. J. Butler, J. |
author_facet | Gogna, S. Latifi, R. Policastro, A. Prabhakaran, K. Anderson, P. Con, J. Choi, J. Samson, D. J. Butler, J. |
author_sort | Gogna, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAWR using porcine-derived, non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (Strattice™) between January 2014 and July 2017 were studied retrospectively. Propensity matched analysis was performed for risk adjustment in multivariable analysis and for one-to-one matching. The outcomes were analyzed for differences in postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality, hospital length of stay and adverse discharge disposition. RESULTS: One hundred-thirty-six patients were identified during the study period. Non-elderly (aged 18–64 years) constituted 70% (n = 95) and elderly (aged ≥ 65 years) comprised 30% of the overall patient population (n = 41). Seventy-three (56.7%) were females. After adjustment through the propensity score, which included 35 pairs, the surgical site infection (p = 1.000), wound necrosis (p = 1.000), the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.259), mortality (p = 0.083), reoperation rate (p = 0.141), hospital length of stay (p = 0.206), and discharge disposition (p = 0.795) were similar. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing CAWR with biological mesh have comparable outcomes with non-elderly patients when using propensity matching score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72232332020-05-15 Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis Gogna, S. Latifi, R. Policastro, A. Prabhakaran, K. Anderson, P. Con, J. Choi, J. Samson, D. J. Butler, J. Hernia Original Article BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAWR using porcine-derived, non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (Strattice™) between January 2014 and July 2017 were studied retrospectively. Propensity matched analysis was performed for risk adjustment in multivariable analysis and for one-to-one matching. The outcomes were analyzed for differences in postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality, hospital length of stay and adverse discharge disposition. RESULTS: One hundred-thirty-six patients were identified during the study period. Non-elderly (aged 18–64 years) constituted 70% (n = 95) and elderly (aged ≥ 65 years) comprised 30% of the overall patient population (n = 41). Seventy-three (56.7%) were females. After adjustment through the propensity score, which included 35 pairs, the surgical site infection (p = 1.000), wound necrosis (p = 1.000), the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.259), mortality (p = 0.083), reoperation rate (p = 0.141), hospital length of stay (p = 0.206), and discharge disposition (p = 0.795) were similar. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing CAWR with biological mesh have comparable outcomes with non-elderly patients when using propensity matching score. Springer Paris 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223233/ /pubmed/31981009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gogna, S. Latifi, R. Policastro, A. Prabhakaran, K. Anderson, P. Con, J. Choi, J. Samson, D. J. Butler, J. Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title | Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title_full | Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title_short | Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
title_sort | complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gognas complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT latifir complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT policastroa complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT prabhakarank complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT andersonp complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT conj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT choij complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT samsondj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis AT butlerj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis |