Cargando…

Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gogna, S., Latifi, R., Policastro, A., Prabhakaran, K., Anderson, P., Con, J., Choi, J., Samson, D. J., Butler, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7
_version_ 1783533721745358848
author Gogna, S.
Latifi, R.
Policastro, A.
Prabhakaran, K.
Anderson, P.
Con, J.
Choi, J.
Samson, D. J.
Butler, J.
author_facet Gogna, S.
Latifi, R.
Policastro, A.
Prabhakaran, K.
Anderson, P.
Con, J.
Choi, J.
Samson, D. J.
Butler, J.
author_sort Gogna, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAWR using porcine-derived, non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (Strattice™) between January 2014 and July 2017 were studied retrospectively. Propensity matched analysis was performed for risk adjustment in multivariable analysis and for one-to-one matching. The outcomes were analyzed for differences in postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality, hospital length of stay and adverse discharge disposition. RESULTS: One hundred-thirty-six patients were identified during the study period. Non-elderly (aged 18–64 years) constituted 70% (n = 95) and elderly (aged ≥ 65 years) comprised 30% of the overall patient population (n = 41). Seventy-three (56.7%) were females. After adjustment through the propensity score, which included 35 pairs, the surgical site infection (p = 1.000), wound necrosis (p = 1.000), the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.259), mortality (p = 0.083), reoperation rate (p = 0.141), hospital length of stay (p = 0.206), and discharge disposition (p = 0.795) were similar. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing CAWR with biological mesh have comparable outcomes with non-elderly patients when using propensity matching score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72232332020-05-15 Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis Gogna, S. Latifi, R. Policastro, A. Prabhakaran, K. Anderson, P. Con, J. Choi, J. Samson, D. J. Butler, J. Hernia Original Article BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has become a common surgical procedure both in non-elderly and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the elderly compared to nonelderly undergoing CAWR using propensity score matching. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAWR using porcine-derived, non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (Strattice™) between January 2014 and July 2017 were studied retrospectively. Propensity matched analysis was performed for risk adjustment in multivariable analysis and for one-to-one matching. The outcomes were analyzed for differences in postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality, hospital length of stay and adverse discharge disposition. RESULTS: One hundred-thirty-six patients were identified during the study period. Non-elderly (aged 18–64 years) constituted 70% (n = 95) and elderly (aged ≥ 65 years) comprised 30% of the overall patient population (n = 41). Seventy-three (56.7%) were females. After adjustment through the propensity score, which included 35 pairs, the surgical site infection (p = 1.000), wound necrosis (p = 1.000), the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.259), mortality (p = 0.083), reoperation rate (p = 0.141), hospital length of stay (p = 0.206), and discharge disposition (p = 0.795) were similar. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing CAWR with biological mesh have comparable outcomes with non-elderly patients when using propensity matching score. Springer Paris 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223233/ /pubmed/31981009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gogna, S.
Latifi, R.
Policastro, A.
Prabhakaran, K.
Anderson, P.
Con, J.
Choi, J.
Samson, D. J.
Butler, J.
Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title_full Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title_fullStr Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title_short Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
title_sort complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gognas complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT latifir complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT policastroa complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT prabhakarank complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT andersonp complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT conj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT choij complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT samsondj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT butlerj complexabdominalwallherniarepairwithbiologicmeshinelderlyapropensitymatchedanalysis