Cargando…

Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study

BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Iftekhar, Maredza, Mandy, Dritsaki, Melina, Mistry, Dipesh, Lall, Ranjit, Lamb, Sarah E., Couper, Keith, Gates, Simon, Perkins, Gavin D., Petrou, Stavros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1
_version_ 1783533723671592960
author Khan, Iftekhar
Maredza, Mandy
Dritsaki, Melina
Mistry, Dipesh
Lall, Ranjit
Lamb, Sarah E.
Couper, Keith
Gates, Simon
Perkins, Gavin D.
Petrou, Stavros
author_facet Khan, Iftekhar
Maredza, Mandy
Dritsaki, Melina
Mistry, Dipesh
Lall, Ranjit
Lamb, Sarah E.
Couper, Keith
Gates, Simon
Perkins, Gavin D.
Petrou, Stavros
author_sort Khan, Iftekhar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the cost effectiveness of protocolised weaning, including early extubation onto NIV, compared with weaning without NIV in a UK National Health Service setting. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation or ongoing IMV with daily spontaneous breathing trials. The primary efficacy outcome was time to liberation from ventilation. Bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) provided estimates of the incremental cost per QALY and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) overall and for subgroups [presence/absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and operative status]. Long-term cost effectiveness was determined through extrapolation of survival curves using flexible parametric modelling. RESULTS: NIV was associated with a mean INMB of £620 ($US885) (cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per QALY) with a corresponding probability of 58% that NIV is cost effective. The probability that NIV is cost effective was higher for those with COPD (84%). NIV was cost effective over 5 years, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £4618 ($US6594 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of NIV being cost effective relative to weaning without NIV ranged between 57 and 59% overall and between 82 and 87% for the COPD subgroup. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72232482020-05-15 Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study Khan, Iftekhar Maredza, Mandy Dritsaki, Melina Mistry, Dipesh Lall, Ranjit Lamb, Sarah E. Couper, Keith Gates, Simon Perkins, Gavin D. Petrou, Stavros Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the cost effectiveness of protocolised weaning, including early extubation onto NIV, compared with weaning without NIV in a UK National Health Service setting. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation or ongoing IMV with daily spontaneous breathing trials. The primary efficacy outcome was time to liberation from ventilation. Bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) provided estimates of the incremental cost per QALY and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) overall and for subgroups [presence/absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and operative status]. Long-term cost effectiveness was determined through extrapolation of survival curves using flexible parametric modelling. RESULTS: NIV was associated with a mean INMB of £620 ($US885) (cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per QALY) with a corresponding probability of 58% that NIV is cost effective. The probability that NIV is cost effective was higher for those with COPD (84%). NIV was cost effective over 5 years, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £4618 ($US6594 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of NIV being cost effective relative to weaning without NIV ranged between 57 and 59% overall and between 82 and 87% for the COPD subgroup. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7223248/ /pubmed/32240532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Khan, Iftekhar
Maredza, Mandy
Dritsaki, Melina
Mistry, Dipesh
Lall, Ranjit
Lamb, Sarah E.
Couper, Keith
Gates, Simon
Perkins, Gavin D.
Petrou, Stavros
Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title_full Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title_fullStr Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title_short Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
title_sort is protocolised weaning that includes early extubation onto non-invasive ventilation more cost effective than protocolised weaning without non-invasive ventilation? findings from the breathe study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1
work_keys_str_mv AT khaniftekhar isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT maredzamandy isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT dritsakimelina isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT mistrydipesh isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT lallranjit isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT lambsarahe isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT couperkeith isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT gatessimon isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT perkinsgavind isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT petroustavros isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy
AT isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy