Cargando…
Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilato...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1 |
_version_ | 1783533723671592960 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Iftekhar Maredza, Mandy Dritsaki, Melina Mistry, Dipesh Lall, Ranjit Lamb, Sarah E. Couper, Keith Gates, Simon Perkins, Gavin D. Petrou, Stavros |
author_facet | Khan, Iftekhar Maredza, Mandy Dritsaki, Melina Mistry, Dipesh Lall, Ranjit Lamb, Sarah E. Couper, Keith Gates, Simon Perkins, Gavin D. Petrou, Stavros |
author_sort | Khan, Iftekhar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the cost effectiveness of protocolised weaning, including early extubation onto NIV, compared with weaning without NIV in a UK National Health Service setting. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation or ongoing IMV with daily spontaneous breathing trials. The primary efficacy outcome was time to liberation from ventilation. Bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) provided estimates of the incremental cost per QALY and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) overall and for subgroups [presence/absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and operative status]. Long-term cost effectiveness was determined through extrapolation of survival curves using flexible parametric modelling. RESULTS: NIV was associated with a mean INMB of £620 ($US885) (cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per QALY) with a corresponding probability of 58% that NIV is cost effective. The probability that NIV is cost effective was higher for those with COPD (84%). NIV was cost effective over 5 years, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £4618 ($US6594 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of NIV being cost effective relative to weaning without NIV ranged between 57 and 59% overall and between 82 and 87% for the COPD subgroup. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72232482020-05-15 Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study Khan, Iftekhar Maredza, Mandy Dritsaki, Melina Mistry, Dipesh Lall, Ranjit Lamb, Sarah E. Couper, Keith Gates, Simon Perkins, Gavin D. Petrou, Stavros Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Optimising techniques to wean patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a key goal of intensive care practice. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning strategy (transitioning patients who are difficult to wean to early NIV) may reduce mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the cost effectiveness of protocolised weaning, including early extubation onto NIV, compared with weaning without NIV in a UK National Health Service setting. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation or ongoing IMV with daily spontaneous breathing trials. The primary efficacy outcome was time to liberation from ventilation. Bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) provided estimates of the incremental cost per QALY and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) overall and for subgroups [presence/absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and operative status]. Long-term cost effectiveness was determined through extrapolation of survival curves using flexible parametric modelling. RESULTS: NIV was associated with a mean INMB of £620 ($US885) (cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per QALY) with a corresponding probability of 58% that NIV is cost effective. The probability that NIV is cost effective was higher for those with COPD (84%). NIV was cost effective over 5 years, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £4618 ($US6594 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of NIV being cost effective relative to weaning without NIV ranged between 57 and 59% overall and between 82 and 87% for the COPD subgroup. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7223248/ /pubmed/32240532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Khan, Iftekhar Maredza, Mandy Dritsaki, Melina Mistry, Dipesh Lall, Ranjit Lamb, Sarah E. Couper, Keith Gates, Simon Perkins, Gavin D. Petrou, Stavros Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title | Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title_full | Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title_fullStr | Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title_short | Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study |
title_sort | is protocolised weaning that includes early extubation onto non-invasive ventilation more cost effective than protocolised weaning without non-invasive ventilation? findings from the breathe study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khaniftekhar isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT maredzamandy isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT dritsakimelina isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT mistrydipesh isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT lallranjit isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT lambsarahe isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT couperkeith isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT gatessimon isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT perkinsgavind isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT petroustavros isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy AT isprotocolisedweaningthatincludesearlyextubationontononinvasiveventilationmorecosteffectivethanprotocolisedweaningwithoutnoninvasiveventilationfindingsfromthebreathestudy |