Cargando…
Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32376722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000440 |
_version_ | 1783533729572978688 |
---|---|
author | Nan Tie, Emilia Lai-Kwon, Julia Rtshiladze, Michael Alexander Na, Lumine Bozzi, James Read, Tavis Atkinson, Victoria Au-Yeung, George Long, Georgina V McArthur, Grant A Sandhu, Shahneen Saw, Robyn Walpole, Euan Menzies, Alexander Smithers, Mark Gyorki, David E |
author_facet | Nan Tie, Emilia Lai-Kwon, Julia Rtshiladze, Michael Alexander Na, Lumine Bozzi, James Read, Tavis Atkinson, Victoria Au-Yeung, George Long, Georgina V McArthur, Grant A Sandhu, Shahneen Saw, Robyn Walpole, Euan Menzies, Alexander Smithers, Mark Gyorki, David E |
author_sort | Nan Tie, Emilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46). ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72232852020-05-15 Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma Nan Tie, Emilia Lai-Kwon, Julia Rtshiladze, Michael Alexander Na, Lumine Bozzi, James Read, Tavis Atkinson, Victoria Au-Yeung, George Long, Georgina V McArthur, Grant A Sandhu, Shahneen Saw, Robyn Walpole, Euan Menzies, Alexander Smithers, Mark Gyorki, David E J Immunother Cancer Short Report BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46). ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7223285/ /pubmed/32376722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000440 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Nan Tie, Emilia Lai-Kwon, Julia Rtshiladze, Michael Alexander Na, Lumine Bozzi, James Read, Tavis Atkinson, Victoria Au-Yeung, George Long, Georgina V McArthur, Grant A Sandhu, Shahneen Saw, Robyn Walpole, Euan Menzies, Alexander Smithers, Mark Gyorki, David E Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title | Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title_full | Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title_short | Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
title_sort | efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32376722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nantieemilia efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT laikwonjulia efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT rtshiladzemichaelalexander efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT nalumine efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT bozzijames efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT readtavis efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT atkinsonvictoria efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT auyeunggeorge efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT longgeorginav efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT mcarthurgranta efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT sandhushahneen efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT sawrobyn efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT walpoleeuan efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT menziesalexander efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT smithersmark efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma AT gyorkidavide efficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforintransitmelanoma |