Cargando…
Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Studies assessing the effect of high dose tigecycline on severe infections are limited and remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess systematically the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline in the treatment of severe infections. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01235-y |
_version_ | 1783533746046107648 |
---|---|
author | Zha, Lei Pan, Lingling Guo, Jun French, Neil Villanueva, Elmer V. Tefsen, Boris |
author_facet | Zha, Lei Pan, Lingling Guo, Jun French, Neil Villanueva, Elmer V. Tefsen, Boris |
author_sort | Zha, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies assessing the effect of high dose tigecycline on severe infections are limited and remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess systematically the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline in the treatment of severe infections. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials were searched up to February 20, 2019 for studies that compared the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline with standard dose tigecycline or other non-tigecycline-containing regimens in the treatment of severe infections. Rates for all-cause mortality, clinical cure, microbiological eradication and adverse events were analysed. RESULTS: Ten studies with 593 patients were included. The results indicated that using high dose tigecycline resulted in better outcomes compared with controls with lower all-cause mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30–0.66, p < 0.0001), higher clinical cure (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.09–5.63, p < 0.00001), higher microbiological eradication (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.44–3.50, p = 0.0003), and without increasing adverse events rates. Subgroup analysis showed that high dose tigecycline reduced all-cause mortality in nosocomial acquired pneumonia (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.70, p = 0.002), bloodstream infections (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.58, p = 0.004) and mixed infections (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.59, p = 0.003), with no statistical differences in complicated intra-abdominal infections (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.80–5.23, p = 0.14). In carbapenem-resistant pathogens, the microbiological eradication rate in those given high dose tigecycline did not differ from controls (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44–2.60, p = 0.87), although mortality was reduced (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.45, p = 0.0001). The main limitation of the review is that most of the included studies are observational studies with small sample sizes and high risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS: High dose tigecycline treatment is effective and safe for severe infections owing to its lower all-cause mortality, higher clinical cure, microbiological eradication and comparable adverse events. However, as a result of the high risks of bias of the included studies, well-designed randomised clinical trials are warranted to establish the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline compared with standard dose tigecycline and other commonly used antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72234072020-05-15 Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zha, Lei Pan, Lingling Guo, Jun French, Neil Villanueva, Elmer V. Tefsen, Boris Adv Ther Review BACKGROUND: Studies assessing the effect of high dose tigecycline on severe infections are limited and remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess systematically the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline in the treatment of severe infections. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials were searched up to February 20, 2019 for studies that compared the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline with standard dose tigecycline or other non-tigecycline-containing regimens in the treatment of severe infections. Rates for all-cause mortality, clinical cure, microbiological eradication and adverse events were analysed. RESULTS: Ten studies with 593 patients were included. The results indicated that using high dose tigecycline resulted in better outcomes compared with controls with lower all-cause mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30–0.66, p < 0.0001), higher clinical cure (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.09–5.63, p < 0.00001), higher microbiological eradication (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.44–3.50, p = 0.0003), and without increasing adverse events rates. Subgroup analysis showed that high dose tigecycline reduced all-cause mortality in nosocomial acquired pneumonia (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.70, p = 0.002), bloodstream infections (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.58, p = 0.004) and mixed infections (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.59, p = 0.003), with no statistical differences in complicated intra-abdominal infections (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.80–5.23, p = 0.14). In carbapenem-resistant pathogens, the microbiological eradication rate in those given high dose tigecycline did not differ from controls (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44–2.60, p = 0.87), although mortality was reduced (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.45, p = 0.0001). The main limitation of the review is that most of the included studies are observational studies with small sample sizes and high risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS: High dose tigecycline treatment is effective and safe for severe infections owing to its lower all-cause mortality, higher clinical cure, microbiological eradication and comparable adverse events. However, as a result of the high risks of bias of the included studies, well-designed randomised clinical trials are warranted to establish the effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline compared with standard dose tigecycline and other commonly used antibiotics. Springer Healthcare 2020-01-31 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223407/ /pubmed/32006240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01235-y Text en © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Zha, Lei Pan, Lingling Guo, Jun French, Neil Villanueva, Elmer V. Tefsen, Boris Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness and Safety of High Dose Tigecycline for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of high dose tigecycline for the treatment of severe infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01235-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhalei effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panlingling effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guojun effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT frenchneil effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT villanuevaelmerv effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tefsenboris effectivenessandsafetyofhighdosetigecyclineforthetreatmentofsevereinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |