Cargando…
Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4 |
_version_ | 1783533760509116416 |
---|---|
author | Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. Trinh, Trang D. Zasowski, Evan J. Lagnf, Abdalhamid M. Bhatia, Sahil Melvin, Sarah M. Simon, Samuel P. Rosenberg, Joshua R. Steed, Molly E. Estrada, Sandra J. Morrisette, Taylor Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. |
author_facet | Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. Trinh, Trang D. Zasowski, Evan J. Lagnf, Abdalhamid M. Bhatia, Sahil Melvin, Sarah M. Simon, Samuel P. Rosenberg, Joshua R. Steed, Molly E. Estrada, Sandra J. Morrisette, Taylor Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. |
author_sort | Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive performance was determined by assessing discrimination, calibration and precision. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were included. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 18 (16.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in discrimination of the three scores [area under the curve (AUC) ICS 0.7039, 95% CI 0.5848–0.8230, PBS 0.6893, 95% CI 0.5709–0.8076, and qPitt 0.6847, 95% CI 0.5671–0.8023; P > 0.05 all pairwise comparisons]. All scores showed adequate calibration and precision. When dichotomized at the optimal cut-points of 11, 3, and 2 for the ICS, PBS, and qPitt, respectively, all scores had NPV > 90% at the expense of low PPV. Patients in the high-risk groups had a relative risk for mortality of 3.184 (95% CI 1.35–8.930), 3.068 (95% CI 1.094–8.606), and 2.850 (95% CI 1.016–7.994) for the dichotomized ICS, PBS, and qPitt, scores respectively. Treatment-related variables (early active antibiotic therapy, combination antibiotics and renal ceftazidime–avibactam dose adjustment) were not associated with mortality after controlling for the risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for CRE infections, mortality risk scores demonstrated variable performance. Modifications to scoring systems to more accurately predict outcomes in the era of novel antibiotics are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72235092020-05-27 Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. Trinh, Trang D. Zasowski, Evan J. Lagnf, Abdalhamid M. Bhatia, Sahil Melvin, Sarah M. Simon, Samuel P. Rosenberg, Joshua R. Steed, Molly E. Estrada, Sandra J. Morrisette, Taylor Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Infect Dis Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive performance was determined by assessing discrimination, calibration and precision. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were included. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 18 (16.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in discrimination of the three scores [area under the curve (AUC) ICS 0.7039, 95% CI 0.5848–0.8230, PBS 0.6893, 95% CI 0.5709–0.8076, and qPitt 0.6847, 95% CI 0.5671–0.8023; P > 0.05 all pairwise comparisons]. All scores showed adequate calibration and precision. When dichotomized at the optimal cut-points of 11, 3, and 2 for the ICS, PBS, and qPitt, respectively, all scores had NPV > 90% at the expense of low PPV. Patients in the high-risk groups had a relative risk for mortality of 3.184 (95% CI 1.35–8.930), 3.068 (95% CI 1.094–8.606), and 2.850 (95% CI 1.016–7.994) for the dichotomized ICS, PBS, and qPitt, scores respectively. Treatment-related variables (early active antibiotic therapy, combination antibiotics and renal ceftazidime–avibactam dose adjustment) were not associated with mortality after controlling for the risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for CRE infections, mortality risk scores demonstrated variable performance. Modifications to scoring systems to more accurately predict outcomes in the era of novel antibiotics are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-02-22 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7223509/ /pubmed/32088843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. Trinh, Trang D. Zasowski, Evan J. Lagnf, Abdalhamid M. Bhatia, Sahil Melvin, Sarah M. Simon, Samuel P. Rosenberg, Joshua R. Steed, Molly E. Estrada, Sandra J. Morrisette, Taylor Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title | Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title_full | Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title_short | Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam |
title_sort | evaluation of the increment-cpe, pitt bacteremia and qpitt scores in patients with carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jorgensensarahcj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT trinhtrangd evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT zasowskievanj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT lagnfabdalhamidm evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT bhatiasahil evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT melvinsarahm evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT simonsamuelp evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT rosenbergjoshuar evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT steedmollye evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT estradasandraj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT morrisettetaylor evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT davissusanl evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam AT rybakmichaelj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam |