Cargando…

Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jorgensen, Sarah C. J., Trinh, Trang D., Zasowski, Evan J., Lagnf, Abdalhamid M., Bhatia, Sahil, Melvin, Sarah M., Simon, Samuel P., Rosenberg, Joshua R., Steed, Molly E., Estrada, Sandra J., Morrisette, Taylor, Davis, Susan L., Rybak, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4
_version_ 1783533760509116416
author Jorgensen, Sarah C. J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
Bhatia, Sahil
Melvin, Sarah M.
Simon, Samuel P.
Rosenberg, Joshua R.
Steed, Molly E.
Estrada, Sandra J.
Morrisette, Taylor
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
author_facet Jorgensen, Sarah C. J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
Bhatia, Sahil
Melvin, Sarah M.
Simon, Samuel P.
Rosenberg, Joshua R.
Steed, Molly E.
Estrada, Sandra J.
Morrisette, Taylor
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
author_sort Jorgensen, Sarah C. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive performance was determined by assessing discrimination, calibration and precision. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were included. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 18 (16.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in discrimination of the three scores [area under the curve (AUC) ICS 0.7039, 95% CI 0.5848–0.8230, PBS 0.6893, 95% CI 0.5709–0.8076, and qPitt 0.6847, 95% CI 0.5671–0.8023; P > 0.05 all pairwise comparisons]. All scores showed adequate calibration and precision. When dichotomized at the optimal cut-points of 11, 3, and 2 for the ICS, PBS, and qPitt, respectively, all scores had NPV > 90% at the expense of low PPV. Patients in the high-risk groups had a relative risk for mortality of 3.184 (95% CI 1.35–8.930), 3.068 (95% CI 1.094–8.606), and 2.850 (95% CI 1.016–7.994) for the dichotomized ICS, PBS, and qPitt, scores respectively. Treatment-related variables (early active antibiotic therapy, combination antibiotics and renal ceftazidime–avibactam dose adjustment) were not associated with mortality after controlling for the risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for CRE infections, mortality risk scores demonstrated variable performance. Modifications to scoring systems to more accurately predict outcomes in the era of novel antibiotics are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72235092020-05-27 Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam Jorgensen, Sarah C. J. Trinh, Trang D. Zasowski, Evan J. Lagnf, Abdalhamid M. Bhatia, Sahil Melvin, Sarah M. Simon, Samuel P. Rosenberg, Joshua R. Steed, Molly E. Estrada, Sandra J. Morrisette, Taylor Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Infect Dis Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the INCREMENT-CPE (ICS), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and qPitt for mortality among patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive performance was determined by assessing discrimination, calibration and precision. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were included. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 18 (16.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in discrimination of the three scores [area under the curve (AUC) ICS 0.7039, 95% CI 0.5848–0.8230, PBS 0.6893, 95% CI 0.5709–0.8076, and qPitt 0.6847, 95% CI 0.5671–0.8023; P > 0.05 all pairwise comparisons]. All scores showed adequate calibration and precision. When dichotomized at the optimal cut-points of 11, 3, and 2 for the ICS, PBS, and qPitt, respectively, all scores had NPV > 90% at the expense of low PPV. Patients in the high-risk groups had a relative risk for mortality of 3.184 (95% CI 1.35–8.930), 3.068 (95% CI 1.094–8.606), and 2.850 (95% CI 1.016–7.994) for the dichotomized ICS, PBS, and qPitt, scores respectively. Treatment-related variables (early active antibiotic therapy, combination antibiotics and renal ceftazidime–avibactam dose adjustment) were not associated with mortality after controlling for the risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for CRE infections, mortality risk scores demonstrated variable performance. Modifications to scoring systems to more accurately predict outcomes in the era of novel antibiotics are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-02-22 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7223509/ /pubmed/32088843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Jorgensen, Sarah C. J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
Bhatia, Sahil
Melvin, Sarah M.
Simon, Samuel P.
Rosenberg, Joshua R.
Steed, Molly E.
Estrada, Sandra J.
Morrisette, Taylor
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title_full Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title_fullStr Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title_short Evaluation of the INCREMENT-CPE, Pitt Bacteremia and qPitt Scores in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections Treated with Ceftazidime–Avibactam
title_sort evaluation of the increment-cpe, pitt bacteremia and qpitt scores in patients with carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infections treated with ceftazidime–avibactam
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00288-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgensensarahcj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT trinhtrangd evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT zasowskievanj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT lagnfabdalhamidm evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT bhatiasahil evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT melvinsarahm evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT simonsamuelp evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT rosenbergjoshuar evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT steedmollye evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT estradasandraj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT morrisettetaylor evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT davissusanl evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam
AT rybakmichaelj evaluationoftheincrementcpepittbacteremiaandqpittscoresinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionstreatedwithceftazidimeavibactam