Cargando…

Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campogiani, Laura, Tejada, Sofia, Ferreira-Coimbra, João, Restrepo, Marcos I., Rello, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z
_version_ 1783533762154332160
author Campogiani, Laura
Tejada, Sofia
Ferreira-Coimbra, João
Restrepo, Marcos I.
Rello, Jordi
author_facet Campogiani, Laura
Tejada, Sofia
Ferreira-Coimbra, João
Restrepo, Marcos I.
Rello, Jordi
author_sort Campogiani, Laura
collection PubMed
description Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). CPGs released by international scientific societies after year 2000, using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were analyzed. Number and strength of recommendations and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low) were extracted and indexed in the aforementioned sections. High-quality evidence was based on randomized control trials (RCT) without important limitations and exceptionally on rigorous observational studies. Eighty recommendations were assessed, with 7 (8.7%), 24 (30.0%), 29 (36.3%), and 20 (25.0%) being supported by high, moderate, low, and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Highest evidence degree was reported for 26 prevention recommendations, with 7 (26.9%) supported by high-quality evidence and no recommendation based on very low-quality evidence. In contrast, among 9 recommendations for diagnosis and 45 for therapy, none was supported by high-quality evidence, in spite of being recommended as strong in 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. Among HAP/VAP diagnosis recommendations, the majority of evidence was rated as low or very low-quality (55.6% and 22.2%, respectively) whereas among HAP/VAP therapy recommendations, 4/5 were rated as low and very low-quality (40% each). In conclusion, among HAP/VAP international guidelines, most recommendations, particularly in therapy, remain supported by observational studies, case reports, and expert opinion. Well-designed RCTs are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72235212020-05-15 Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults Campogiani, Laura Tejada, Sofia Ferreira-Coimbra, João Restrepo, Marcos I. Rello, Jordi Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). CPGs released by international scientific societies after year 2000, using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were analyzed. Number and strength of recommendations and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low) were extracted and indexed in the aforementioned sections. High-quality evidence was based on randomized control trials (RCT) without important limitations and exceptionally on rigorous observational studies. Eighty recommendations were assessed, with 7 (8.7%), 24 (30.0%), 29 (36.3%), and 20 (25.0%) being supported by high, moderate, low, and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Highest evidence degree was reported for 26 prevention recommendations, with 7 (26.9%) supported by high-quality evidence and no recommendation based on very low-quality evidence. In contrast, among 9 recommendations for diagnosis and 45 for therapy, none was supported by high-quality evidence, in spite of being recommended as strong in 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. Among HAP/VAP diagnosis recommendations, the majority of evidence was rated as low or very low-quality (55.6% and 22.2%, respectively) whereas among HAP/VAP therapy recommendations, 4/5 were rated as low and very low-quality (40% each). In conclusion, among HAP/VAP international guidelines, most recommendations, particularly in therapy, remain supported by observational studies, case reports, and expert opinion. Well-designed RCTs are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223521/ /pubmed/31823149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Campogiani, Laura
Tejada, Sofia
Ferreira-Coimbra, João
Restrepo, Marcos I.
Rello, Jordi
Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title_full Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title_fullStr Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title_full_unstemmed Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title_short Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
title_sort evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of hap and vap in adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z
work_keys_str_mv AT campogianilaura evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults
AT tejadasofia evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults
AT ferreiracoimbrajoao evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults
AT restrepomarcosi evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults
AT rellojordi evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults