Cargando…
Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z |
_version_ | 1783533762154332160 |
---|---|
author | Campogiani, Laura Tejada, Sofia Ferreira-Coimbra, João Restrepo, Marcos I. Rello, Jordi |
author_facet | Campogiani, Laura Tejada, Sofia Ferreira-Coimbra, João Restrepo, Marcos I. Rello, Jordi |
author_sort | Campogiani, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). CPGs released by international scientific societies after year 2000, using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were analyzed. Number and strength of recommendations and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low) were extracted and indexed in the aforementioned sections. High-quality evidence was based on randomized control trials (RCT) without important limitations and exceptionally on rigorous observational studies. Eighty recommendations were assessed, with 7 (8.7%), 24 (30.0%), 29 (36.3%), and 20 (25.0%) being supported by high, moderate, low, and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Highest evidence degree was reported for 26 prevention recommendations, with 7 (26.9%) supported by high-quality evidence and no recommendation based on very low-quality evidence. In contrast, among 9 recommendations for diagnosis and 45 for therapy, none was supported by high-quality evidence, in spite of being recommended as strong in 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. Among HAP/VAP diagnosis recommendations, the majority of evidence was rated as low or very low-quality (55.6% and 22.2%, respectively) whereas among HAP/VAP therapy recommendations, 4/5 were rated as low and very low-quality (40% each). In conclusion, among HAP/VAP international guidelines, most recommendations, particularly in therapy, remain supported by observational studies, case reports, and expert opinion. Well-designed RCTs are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72235212020-05-15 Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults Campogiani, Laura Tejada, Sofia Ferreira-Coimbra, João Restrepo, Marcos I. Rello, Jordi Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). CPGs released by international scientific societies after year 2000, using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were analyzed. Number and strength of recommendations and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low) were extracted and indexed in the aforementioned sections. High-quality evidence was based on randomized control trials (RCT) without important limitations and exceptionally on rigorous observational studies. Eighty recommendations were assessed, with 7 (8.7%), 24 (30.0%), 29 (36.3%), and 20 (25.0%) being supported by high, moderate, low, and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Highest evidence degree was reported for 26 prevention recommendations, with 7 (26.9%) supported by high-quality evidence and no recommendation based on very low-quality evidence. In contrast, among 9 recommendations for diagnosis and 45 for therapy, none was supported by high-quality evidence, in spite of being recommended as strong in 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. Among HAP/VAP diagnosis recommendations, the majority of evidence was rated as low or very low-quality (55.6% and 22.2%, respectively) whereas among HAP/VAP therapy recommendations, 4/5 were rated as low and very low-quality (40% each). In conclusion, among HAP/VAP international guidelines, most recommendations, particularly in therapy, remain supported by observational studies, case reports, and expert opinion. Well-designed RCTs are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223521/ /pubmed/31823149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Campogiani, Laura Tejada, Sofia Ferreira-Coimbra, João Restrepo, Marcos I. Rello, Jordi Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title | Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title_full | Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title_fullStr | Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title_short | Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults |
title_sort | evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of hap and vap in adults |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campogianilaura evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults AT tejadasofia evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults AT ferreiracoimbrajoao evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults AT restrepomarcosi evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults AT rellojordi evidencesupportingrecommendationsfrominternationalguidelinesontreatmentdiagnosisandpreventionofhapandvapinadults |