Cargando…

Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission

Misidentification of illness severity may lead to patients being admitted to a ward bed then unexpectedly transferring to an ICU as their condition deteriorates. Our objective was to develop a predictive analytic tool to identify emergency department (ED) patients that required upgrade to an intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glass, George, Hartka, Thomas R., Keim-Malpass, Jessica, Enfield, Kyle B., Clark, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00500-3
_version_ 1783533763062398976
author Glass, George
Hartka, Thomas R.
Keim-Malpass, Jessica
Enfield, Kyle B.
Clark, Matthew T.
author_facet Glass, George
Hartka, Thomas R.
Keim-Malpass, Jessica
Enfield, Kyle B.
Clark, Matthew T.
author_sort Glass, George
collection PubMed
description Misidentification of illness severity may lead to patients being admitted to a ward bed then unexpectedly transferring to an ICU as their condition deteriorates. Our objective was to develop a predictive analytic tool to identify emergency department (ED) patients that required upgrade to an intensive or intermediate care unit (ICU or IMU) within 24 h after being admitted to an acute care floor. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to identify ED patients that were admitted to an acute care unit and identified cases where the patient was upgraded to ICU or IMU within 24 h. We used data available at the time of admission to build a logistic regression model that predicts early ICU transfer. We found 42,332 patients admitted between January 2012 and December 2016. There were 496 cases (1.2%) of early ICU transfer. Case patients had 18.0-fold higher mortality (11.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and 3.4 days longer hospital stays (5.9 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001) than those without an early transfer. Our predictive analytic model had a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67–0.72) and identified 10% of early ICU transfers with an alert rate of 1.6 per week (162.2 acute care admits per week, 1.9 early ICU transfers). Predictive analytic monitoring based on data available in the emergency department can identify patients that will require upgrade to ICU or IMU if admitted to acute care. Incorporating this tool into ED practice may draw attention to high-risk patients before acute care admit and allow early intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7223530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72235302020-05-15 Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission Glass, George Hartka, Thomas R. Keim-Malpass, Jessica Enfield, Kyle B. Clark, Matthew T. J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Misidentification of illness severity may lead to patients being admitted to a ward bed then unexpectedly transferring to an ICU as their condition deteriorates. Our objective was to develop a predictive analytic tool to identify emergency department (ED) patients that required upgrade to an intensive or intermediate care unit (ICU or IMU) within 24 h after being admitted to an acute care floor. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to identify ED patients that were admitted to an acute care unit and identified cases where the patient was upgraded to ICU or IMU within 24 h. We used data available at the time of admission to build a logistic regression model that predicts early ICU transfer. We found 42,332 patients admitted between January 2012 and December 2016. There were 496 cases (1.2%) of early ICU transfer. Case patients had 18.0-fold higher mortality (11.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and 3.4 days longer hospital stays (5.9 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001) than those without an early transfer. Our predictive analytic model had a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67–0.72) and identified 10% of early ICU transfers with an alert rate of 1.6 per week (162.2 acute care admits per week, 1.9 early ICU transfers). Predictive analytic monitoring based on data available in the emergency department can identify patients that will require upgrade to ICU or IMU if admitted to acute care. Incorporating this tool into ED practice may draw attention to high-risk patients before acute care admit and allow early intervention. Springer Netherlands 2020-03-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7223530/ /pubmed/32193694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00500-3 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research
Glass, George
Hartka, Thomas R.
Keim-Malpass, Jessica
Enfield, Kyle B.
Clark, Matthew T.
Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title_full Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title_fullStr Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title_short Dynamic data in the ED predict requirement for ICU transfer following acute care admission
title_sort dynamic data in the ed predict requirement for icu transfer following acute care admission
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00500-3
work_keys_str_mv AT glassgeorge dynamicdataintheedpredictrequirementforicutransferfollowingacutecareadmission
AT hartkathomasr dynamicdataintheedpredictrequirementforicutransferfollowingacutecareadmission
AT keimmalpassjessica dynamicdataintheedpredictrequirementforicutransferfollowingacutecareadmission
AT enfieldkyleb dynamicdataintheedpredictrequirementforicutransferfollowingacutecareadmission
AT clarkmatthewt dynamicdataintheedpredictrequirementforicutransferfollowingacutecareadmission