Cargando…
Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The judicialization of medicine can lead to professional disenchantment and defensive attitudes among surgeons. Some quantitative studies have investigated this topic in spine surgery, but none has provided direct thematic feedback from physicians. This qualitative study aimed to identif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z |
_version_ | 1783533772124192768 |
---|---|
author | Guillain, Antoine Moncany, Anne-Hélène Hamel, Olivier Gerson, Carole Bougeard, Renaud Dran, Grégory Debono, Bertrand |
author_facet | Guillain, Antoine Moncany, Anne-Hélène Hamel, Olivier Gerson, Carole Bougeard, Renaud Dran, Grégory Debono, Bertrand |
author_sort | Guillain, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The judicialization of medicine can lead to professional disenchantment and defensive attitudes among surgeons. Some quantitative studies have investigated this topic in spine surgery, but none has provided direct thematic feedback from physicians. This qualitative study aimed to identify the impact of this phenomenon in the practice of spine neurosurgeons. METHODS: We proposed a qualitative study using grounded theory approach. Twenty-three purposively selected private neurosurgeons participated. Inclusion took place until data saturation was reached. Data were collected through individual interviews and analyzed thematically and independently by three researchers (an anthropologist, a psychiatrist, and a neurosurgeon). RESULTS: Data analysis identified five superordinate themes that were based on items that recurred in interviews: (1) private practice of spinal surgery (high-risk surgery based on frequent functional symptoms, in an unfavorable medicolegal context); (2) societal transformation of the doctor-patient relationship (new societal demands, impact of the internet and social network); (3) judicialization of spine surgery (surgeons’ feelings about the frequency and motivation of the complaints they receive, and their own management of them); (4) coping strategies (identification and solutions for “at risk” situations and patients); and (5) professional disenchantment (impact of these events on surgeons’ daily practice and career planning). Selected quotes of interviews were reported to support these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights several elements that can alter the quality of care in a context of societal change and the judicialization of medicine. The alteration of the doctor-patient relationship and the permanent pressure of a possible complaint encourage surgeons to adopt defensive attitudes in order to minimize the risks of litigation and increased insurance premiums. These phenomena can affect the quality of care and the privacy of physicians to the extent that they may consider changing or interrupting their careers earlier. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7223614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72236142020-05-15 Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study Guillain, Antoine Moncany, Anne-Hélène Hamel, Olivier Gerson, Carole Bougeard, Renaud Dran, Grégory Debono, Bertrand Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine - Other BACKGROUND: The judicialization of medicine can lead to professional disenchantment and defensive attitudes among surgeons. Some quantitative studies have investigated this topic in spine surgery, but none has provided direct thematic feedback from physicians. This qualitative study aimed to identify the impact of this phenomenon in the practice of spine neurosurgeons. METHODS: We proposed a qualitative study using grounded theory approach. Twenty-three purposively selected private neurosurgeons participated. Inclusion took place until data saturation was reached. Data were collected through individual interviews and analyzed thematically and independently by three researchers (an anthropologist, a psychiatrist, and a neurosurgeon). RESULTS: Data analysis identified five superordinate themes that were based on items that recurred in interviews: (1) private practice of spinal surgery (high-risk surgery based on frequent functional symptoms, in an unfavorable medicolegal context); (2) societal transformation of the doctor-patient relationship (new societal demands, impact of the internet and social network); (3) judicialization of spine surgery (surgeons’ feelings about the frequency and motivation of the complaints they receive, and their own management of them); (4) coping strategies (identification and solutions for “at risk” situations and patients); and (5) professional disenchantment (impact of these events on surgeons’ daily practice and career planning). Selected quotes of interviews were reported to support these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights several elements that can alter the quality of care in a context of societal change and the judicialization of medicine. The alteration of the doctor-patient relationship and the permanent pressure of a possible complaint encourage surgeons to adopt defensive attitudes in order to minimize the risks of litigation and increased insurance premiums. These phenomena can affect the quality of care and the privacy of physicians to the extent that they may consider changing or interrupting their careers earlier. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2020-03-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7223614/ /pubmed/32221729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Spine - Other Guillain, Antoine Moncany, Anne-Hélène Hamel, Olivier Gerson, Carole Bougeard, Renaud Dran, Grégory Debono, Bertrand Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title | Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title_full | Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title_short | Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
title_sort | spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice—a qualitative study |
topic | Original Article - Spine - Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7223614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guillainantoine spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT moncanyannehelene spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT hamelolivier spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT gersoncarole spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT bougeardrenaud spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT drangregory spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy AT debonobertrand spineneurosurgeonsfacingthejudicializationoftheirprofessiondisenchantmentandalterationofdailypracticeaqualitativestudy |