Cargando…

Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice

RPL is a very debated condition, in which many issues concerning definition, etiological factors to investigate or therapies to apply are still controversial. ML could help clinicians to reach an objectiveness in RPL classification and access to care. Our aim was to stratify RPL patients in differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruno, V., D’Orazio, M., Ticconi, C., Abundo, P., Riccio, S., Martinelli, E., Rosato, N., Piccione, E., Zupi, E., Pietropolli, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64512-4
_version_ 1783533834330963968
author Bruno, V.
D’Orazio, M.
Ticconi, C.
Abundo, P.
Riccio, S.
Martinelli, E.
Rosato, N.
Piccione, E.
Zupi, E.
Pietropolli, A.
author_facet Bruno, V.
D’Orazio, M.
Ticconi, C.
Abundo, P.
Riccio, S.
Martinelli, E.
Rosato, N.
Piccione, E.
Zupi, E.
Pietropolli, A.
author_sort Bruno, V.
collection PubMed
description RPL is a very debated condition, in which many issues concerning definition, etiological factors to investigate or therapies to apply are still controversial. ML could help clinicians to reach an objectiveness in RPL classification and access to care. Our aim was to stratify RPL patients in different risk classes by applying an ML algorithm, through a diagnostic work-up to validate it for the appropriate prognosis and potential therapeutic approach. 734 patients were enrolled and divided into 4 risk classes, according to the numbers of miscarriages. ML method, called Support Vector Machine (SVM), was used to analyze data. Using the whole set of 43 features and the set of the most informative 18 features we obtained comparable results: respectively 81.86 ± 0.35% and 81.71 ± 0.37% Unbalanced Accuracy. Applying the same method, introducing the only features recommended by ESHRE, a correct classification was obtained only in 58.52 ± 0.58%. ML approach could provide a Support Decision System tool to stratify RPL patients and address them objectively to the proper clinical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7224066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72240662020-05-20 Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice Bruno, V. D’Orazio, M. Ticconi, C. Abundo, P. Riccio, S. Martinelli, E. Rosato, N. Piccione, E. Zupi, E. Pietropolli, A. Sci Rep Article RPL is a very debated condition, in which many issues concerning definition, etiological factors to investigate or therapies to apply are still controversial. ML could help clinicians to reach an objectiveness in RPL classification and access to care. Our aim was to stratify RPL patients in different risk classes by applying an ML algorithm, through a diagnostic work-up to validate it for the appropriate prognosis and potential therapeutic approach. 734 patients were enrolled and divided into 4 risk classes, according to the numbers of miscarriages. ML method, called Support Vector Machine (SVM), was used to analyze data. Using the whole set of 43 features and the set of the most informative 18 features we obtained comparable results: respectively 81.86 ± 0.35% and 81.71 ± 0.37% Unbalanced Accuracy. Applying the same method, introducing the only features recommended by ESHRE, a correct classification was obtained only in 58.52 ± 0.58%. ML approach could provide a Support Decision System tool to stratify RPL patients and address them objectively to the proper clinical management. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7224066/ /pubmed/32409705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64512-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bruno, V.
D’Orazio, M.
Ticconi, C.
Abundo, P.
Riccio, S.
Martinelli, E.
Rosato, N.
Piccione, E.
Zupi, E.
Pietropolli, A.
Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title_full Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title_fullStr Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title_short Machine Learning (ML) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
title_sort machine learning (ml) based-method applied in recurrent pregnancy loss (rpl) patients diagnostic work-up: a potential innovation in common clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64512-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brunov machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT doraziom machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT ticconic machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT abundop machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT riccios machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT martinellie machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT rosaton machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT piccionee machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT zupie machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice
AT pietropollia machinelearningmlbasedmethodappliedinrecurrentpregnancylossrplpatientsdiagnosticworkupapotentialinnovationincommonclinicalpractice