Cargando…

The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention

The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foldal, Maja D., Blenkmann, Alejandro O., Llorens, Anaïs, Knight, Robert T., Solbakk, Anne-Kristin, Endestad, Tor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y
_version_ 1783533857976352768
author Foldal, Maja D.
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Llorens, Anaïs
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
author_facet Foldal, Maja D.
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Llorens, Anaïs
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
author_sort Foldal, Maja D.
collection PubMed
description The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are independent of attention processes. In this study, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to rhythmic sequences. Predictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones in the rhythm. When SOA deviants were inserted rarely, predictability remained high, whereas predictability was lower with more frequent SOA deviants. Dichotic tone-presentation allowed for independent manipulation of attention, as specific tones of the rhythm were presented to separate ears. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to attend to tones in one ear only, while keeping the rhythmic structure of tones constant. The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for tones when rhythm predictability was high, while the N1 was enhanced by attention to tones. Bayesian statistics revealed no interaction between predictability and attention. A right-lateralization of attention effects, but not predictability effects, suggested potentially different cortical processes. This is the first study to show that probability of rhythm violation influences rhythm predictability, independent of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7224206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72242062020-05-20 The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention Foldal, Maja D. Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Llorens, Anaïs Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor Sci Rep Article The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are independent of attention processes. In this study, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to rhythmic sequences. Predictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones in the rhythm. When SOA deviants were inserted rarely, predictability remained high, whereas predictability was lower with more frequent SOA deviants. Dichotic tone-presentation allowed for independent manipulation of attention, as specific tones of the rhythm were presented to separate ears. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to attend to tones in one ear only, while keeping the rhythmic structure of tones constant. The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for tones when rhythm predictability was high, while the N1 was enhanced by attention to tones. Bayesian statistics revealed no interaction between predictability and attention. A right-lateralization of attention effects, but not predictability effects, suggested potentially different cortical processes. This is the first study to show that probability of rhythm violation influences rhythm predictability, independent of attention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7224206/ /pubmed/32409738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Foldal, Maja D.
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Llorens, Anaïs
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title_full The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title_fullStr The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title_full_unstemmed The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title_short The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
title_sort brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y
work_keys_str_mv AT foldalmajad thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT blenkmannalejandroo thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT llorensanais thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT knightrobertt thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT solbakkannekristin thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT endestadtor thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT foldalmajad braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT blenkmannalejandroo braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT llorensanais braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT knightrobertt braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT solbakkannekristin braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention
AT endestadtor braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention