Cargando…
The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention
The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are inde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y |
_version_ | 1783533857976352768 |
---|---|
author | Foldal, Maja D. Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Llorens, Anaïs Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor |
author_facet | Foldal, Maja D. Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Llorens, Anaïs Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor |
author_sort | Foldal, Maja D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are independent of attention processes. In this study, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to rhythmic sequences. Predictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones in the rhythm. When SOA deviants were inserted rarely, predictability remained high, whereas predictability was lower with more frequent SOA deviants. Dichotic tone-presentation allowed for independent manipulation of attention, as specific tones of the rhythm were presented to separate ears. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to attend to tones in one ear only, while keeping the rhythmic structure of tones constant. The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for tones when rhythm predictability was high, while the N1 was enhanced by attention to tones. Bayesian statistics revealed no interaction between predictability and attention. A right-lateralization of attention effects, but not predictability effects, suggested potentially different cortical processes. This is the first study to show that probability of rhythm violation influences rhythm predictability, independent of attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7224206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72242062020-05-20 The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention Foldal, Maja D. Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Llorens, Anaïs Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor Sci Rep Article The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are independent of attention processes. In this study, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to rhythmic sequences. Predictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones in the rhythm. When SOA deviants were inserted rarely, predictability remained high, whereas predictability was lower with more frequent SOA deviants. Dichotic tone-presentation allowed for independent manipulation of attention, as specific tones of the rhythm were presented to separate ears. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to attend to tones in one ear only, while keeping the rhythmic structure of tones constant. The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for tones when rhythm predictability was high, while the N1 was enhanced by attention to tones. Bayesian statistics revealed no interaction between predictability and attention. A right-lateralization of attention effects, but not predictability effects, suggested potentially different cortical processes. This is the first study to show that probability of rhythm violation influences rhythm predictability, independent of attention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7224206/ /pubmed/32409738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Foldal, Maja D. Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Llorens, Anaïs Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title | The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title_full | The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title_fullStr | The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title_full_unstemmed | The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title_short | The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
title_sort | brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64758-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foldalmajad thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT blenkmannalejandroo thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT llorensanais thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT knightrobertt thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT solbakkannekristin thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT endestadtor thebraintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT foldalmajad braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT blenkmannalejandroo braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT llorensanais braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT knightrobertt braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT solbakkannekristin braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention AT endestadtor braintracksauditoryrhythmpredictabilityindependentofselectiveattention |