Cargando…

Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear

OBJECTIVES: The ideal outcome of cochlear implant surgery involves the insertion of the array inside the scala tympani of the cochlea with the least mechanical trauma. Recently, round window insertion and the direction in which the cochlea is approached have gained attention in this respect. The Ang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topsakal, Vedat, Matulic, Marco, Assadi, Masoud Zoka, Mertens, Griet, Van Rompaey, Vincent, Van de Heyning, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209514
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2020.8113
_version_ 1783533894530760704
author Topsakal, Vedat
Matulic, Marco
Assadi, Masoud Zoka
Mertens, Griet
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Van de Heyning, Paul
author_facet Topsakal, Vedat
Matulic, Marco
Assadi, Masoud Zoka
Mertens, Griet
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Van de Heyning, Paul
author_sort Topsakal, Vedat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The ideal outcome of cochlear implant surgery involves the insertion of the array inside the scala tympani of the cochlea with the least mechanical trauma. Recently, round window insertion and the direction in which the cochlea is approached have gained attention in this respect. The Angles of Cochlear Approach (ACA) can be defined with a plane in the plane of the basal turn, termed the in-plane angle, and the plane orthogonal to this plane, termed the out-plane angle. The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory angles for different surgical techniques of Veria, suprameatal, pericanal, and multiple posterior tympanotomy (PT) approaches, including an optimal trajectory that is simulated for robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trajectories of these surgical techniques were simulated on the same high-resolution computed tomography scan. The simulated trajectory angles were analyzed with dedicated software for medical images, defining the ACA and distances to critical otological structures. RESULTS: The ACA are the smallest for surgical techniques that pass thought the PT. However, performing a surgical PT can include variability in the ACA, ranging from almost 0° to 20.8° in an out-plane angle, depending on how close a surgeon would approach the facial nerve. The Veria, Suprameatal approach (SMA), and peri-canal approaches have larger ACA and minimal distances to the ossicular chain and the ear canal. The maximum distance to the facial nerve and the widest out-plane angle is observe with a pericanal approach. The optimal PT approach refers to the trajectory without collisions and with the best possible ACA that can be planned. CONCLUSION: Different surgical approaches yield important differences in the ACA. PT allows better ACA with maximum distances to the critical structures. However, the optimal PT trajectory simulated for robotic keyhole surgery is a further improvement on the trajectories through the facial recess.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7224420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72244202020-05-15 Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear Topsakal, Vedat Matulic, Marco Assadi, Masoud Zoka Mertens, Griet Van Rompaey, Vincent Van de Heyning, Paul J Int Adv Otol Original Article OBJECTIVES: The ideal outcome of cochlear implant surgery involves the insertion of the array inside the scala tympani of the cochlea with the least mechanical trauma. Recently, round window insertion and the direction in which the cochlea is approached have gained attention in this respect. The Angles of Cochlear Approach (ACA) can be defined with a plane in the plane of the basal turn, termed the in-plane angle, and the plane orthogonal to this plane, termed the out-plane angle. The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory angles for different surgical techniques of Veria, suprameatal, pericanal, and multiple posterior tympanotomy (PT) approaches, including an optimal trajectory that is simulated for robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trajectories of these surgical techniques were simulated on the same high-resolution computed tomography scan. The simulated trajectory angles were analyzed with dedicated software for medical images, defining the ACA and distances to critical otological structures. RESULTS: The ACA are the smallest for surgical techniques that pass thought the PT. However, performing a surgical PT can include variability in the ACA, ranging from almost 0° to 20.8° in an out-plane angle, depending on how close a surgeon would approach the facial nerve. The Veria, Suprameatal approach (SMA), and peri-canal approaches have larger ACA and minimal distances to the ossicular chain and the ear canal. The maximum distance to the facial nerve and the widest out-plane angle is observe with a pericanal approach. The optimal PT approach refers to the trajectory without collisions and with the best possible ACA that can be planned. CONCLUSION: Different surgical approaches yield important differences in the ACA. PT allows better ACA with maximum distances to the critical structures. However, the optimal PT trajectory simulated for robotic keyhole surgery is a further improvement on the trajectories through the facial recess. The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2020-04 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7224420/ /pubmed/32209514 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2020.8113 Text en © Copyright 2020 The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Topsakal, Vedat
Matulic, Marco
Assadi, Masoud Zoka
Mertens, Griet
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Van de Heyning, Paul
Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title_full Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title_fullStr Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title_short Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear
title_sort comparison of the surgical techniques and robotic techniques for cochlear implantation in terms of the trajectories toward the inner ear
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209514
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2020.8113
work_keys_str_mv AT topsakalvedat comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear
AT matulicmarco comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear
AT assadimasoudzoka comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear
AT mertensgriet comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear
AT vanrompaeyvincent comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear
AT vandeheyningpaul comparisonofthesurgicaltechniquesandrobotictechniquesforcochlearimplantationintermsofthetrajectoriestowardtheinnerear