Cargando…
The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790 |
_version_ | 1783533899411881984 |
---|---|
author | Sluydts, Morgana Bernaerts, Anja De Foer, Bert Zarowski, Andrzej van Dinther, Joost Vanspauwen, Robby Offeciers, Erwin |
author_facet | Sluydts, Morgana Bernaerts, Anja De Foer, Bert Zarowski, Andrzej van Dinther, Joost Vanspauwen, Robby Offeciers, Erwin |
author_sort | Sluydts, Morgana |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further “uncovering” of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7224441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72244412020-05-15 The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report Sluydts, Morgana Bernaerts, Anja De Foer, Bert Zarowski, Andrzej van Dinther, Joost Vanspauwen, Robby Offeciers, Erwin J Int Adv Otol Case Report In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further “uncovering” of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss. The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2020-04 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7224441/ /pubmed/32209523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790 Text en © Copyright 2020 The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Sluydts, Morgana Bernaerts, Anja De Foer, Bert Zarowski, Andrzej van Dinther, Joost Vanspauwen, Robby Offeciers, Erwin The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title | The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title_full | The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title_fullStr | The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title_full_unstemmed | The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title_short | The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report |
title_sort | sensitivity of the cvemp test in detecting a superior semicircular canal dehiscence and the influence of a coexisting incudal lysis: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sluydtsmorgana thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT bernaertsanja thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT defoerbert thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT zarowskiandrzej thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT vandintherjoost thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT vanspauwenrobby thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT offecierserwin thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT sluydtsmorgana sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT bernaertsanja sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT defoerbert sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT zarowskiandrzej sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT vandintherjoost sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT vanspauwenrobby sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport AT offecierserwin sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport |