Cargando…

The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report

In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sluydts, Morgana, Bernaerts, Anja, De Foer, Bert, Zarowski, Andrzej, van Dinther, Joost, Vanspauwen, Robby, Offeciers, Erwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790
_version_ 1783533899411881984
author Sluydts, Morgana
Bernaerts, Anja
De Foer, Bert
Zarowski, Andrzej
van Dinther, Joost
Vanspauwen, Robby
Offeciers, Erwin
author_facet Sluydts, Morgana
Bernaerts, Anja
De Foer, Bert
Zarowski, Andrzej
van Dinther, Joost
Vanspauwen, Robby
Offeciers, Erwin
author_sort Sluydts, Morgana
collection PubMed
description In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further “uncovering” of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7224441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72244412020-05-15 The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report Sluydts, Morgana Bernaerts, Anja De Foer, Bert Zarowski, Andrzej van Dinther, Joost Vanspauwen, Robby Offeciers, Erwin J Int Adv Otol Case Report In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further “uncovering” of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss. The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2020-04 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7224441/ /pubmed/32209523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790 Text en © Copyright 2020 The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Case Report
Sluydts, Morgana
Bernaerts, Anja
De Foer, Bert
Zarowski, Andrzej
van Dinther, Joost
Vanspauwen, Robby
Offeciers, Erwin
The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title_full The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title_fullStr The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title_short The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report
title_sort sensitivity of the cvemp test in detecting a superior semicircular canal dehiscence and the influence of a coexisting incudal lysis: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6790
work_keys_str_mv AT sluydtsmorgana thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT bernaertsanja thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT defoerbert thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT zarowskiandrzej thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT vandintherjoost thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT vanspauwenrobby thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT offecierserwin thesensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT sluydtsmorgana sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT bernaertsanja sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT defoerbert sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT zarowskiandrzej sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT vandintherjoost sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT vanspauwenrobby sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport
AT offecierserwin sensitivityofthecvemptestindetectingasuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscenceandtheinfluenceofacoexistingincudallysisacasereport