Cargando…

Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization

In order to determine correct dosage of chemotherapy drugs, the effect of the drug must be properly quantified. There are two important values that characterize the effect of the drug: ε(max) is the maximum possible effect of a drug, and IC(50) is the drug concentration where the effect diminishes b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Hope, McCarthy, Gabriel, Dobrovolny, Hana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32407356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233031
_version_ 1783533911408640000
author Murphy, Hope
McCarthy, Gabriel
Dobrovolny, Hana M.
author_facet Murphy, Hope
McCarthy, Gabriel
Dobrovolny, Hana M.
author_sort Murphy, Hope
collection PubMed
description In order to determine correct dosage of chemotherapy drugs, the effect of the drug must be properly quantified. There are two important values that characterize the effect of the drug: ε(max) is the maximum possible effect of a drug, and IC(50) is the drug concentration where the effect diminishes by half. There is currently a problem with the way these values are measured because they are time-dependent measurements. We use mathematical models to determine how the ε(max) and IC(50) values depend on measurement time and model choice. Seven ordinary differential equation models (ODE) are used for the mathematical analysis; the exponential, Mendelsohn, logistic, linear, surface, Bertalanffy, and Gompertz models. We use the models to simulate tumor growth in the presence and absence of treatment with a known IC(50) and ε(max). Using traditional methods, we then calculate the IC(50) and ε(max) values over fifty days to show the time-dependence of these values for all seven mathematical models. The general trend found is that the measured IC(50) value decreases and the measured ε(max) increases with increasing measurement day for most mathematical models. Unfortunately, the measured values of IC(50) and ε(max) rarely matched the values used to generate the data. Our results show that there is no optimal measurement time since models predict that IC(50) estimates become more accurate at later measurement times while ε(max) is more accurate at early measurement times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7224495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72244952020-06-01 Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization Murphy, Hope McCarthy, Gabriel Dobrovolny, Hana M. PLoS One Research Article In order to determine correct dosage of chemotherapy drugs, the effect of the drug must be properly quantified. There are two important values that characterize the effect of the drug: ε(max) is the maximum possible effect of a drug, and IC(50) is the drug concentration where the effect diminishes by half. There is currently a problem with the way these values are measured because they are time-dependent measurements. We use mathematical models to determine how the ε(max) and IC(50) values depend on measurement time and model choice. Seven ordinary differential equation models (ODE) are used for the mathematical analysis; the exponential, Mendelsohn, logistic, linear, surface, Bertalanffy, and Gompertz models. We use the models to simulate tumor growth in the presence and absence of treatment with a known IC(50) and ε(max). Using traditional methods, we then calculate the IC(50) and ε(max) values over fifty days to show the time-dependence of these values for all seven mathematical models. The general trend found is that the measured IC(50) value decreases and the measured ε(max) increases with increasing measurement day for most mathematical models. Unfortunately, the measured values of IC(50) and ε(max) rarely matched the values used to generate the data. Our results show that there is no optimal measurement time since models predict that IC(50) estimates become more accurate at later measurement times while ε(max) is more accurate at early measurement times. Public Library of Science 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7224495/ /pubmed/32407356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233031 Text en © 2020 Murphy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Hope
McCarthy, Gabriel
Dobrovolny, Hana M.
Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title_full Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title_fullStr Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title_short Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
title_sort understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32407356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233031
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyhope understandingtheeffectofmeasurementtimeondrugcharacterization
AT mccarthygabriel understandingtheeffectofmeasurementtimeondrugcharacterization
AT dobrovolnyhanam understandingtheeffectofmeasurementtimeondrugcharacterization