Cargando…

Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Käsmann, Lukas, Eze, Chukwuka, Taugner, Julian, Roengvoraphoj, Olarn, Belka, Claus, Manapov, Farkhad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420068
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25
_version_ 1783534028412944384
author Käsmann, Lukas
Eze, Chukwuka
Taugner, Julian
Roengvoraphoj, Olarn
Belka, Claus
Manapov, Farkhad
author_facet Käsmann, Lukas
Eze, Chukwuka
Taugner, Julian
Roengvoraphoj, Olarn
Belka, Claus
Manapov, Farkhad
author_sort Käsmann, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management. METHODS: We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate. RESULTS: We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient’s ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7225149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72251492020-05-15 Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey Käsmann, Lukas Eze, Chukwuka Taugner, Julian Roengvoraphoj, Olarn Belka, Claus Manapov, Farkhad Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management. METHODS: We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate. RESULTS: We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient’s ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7225149/ /pubmed/32420068 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25 Text en 2020 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Käsmann, Lukas
Eze, Chukwuka
Taugner, Julian
Roengvoraphoj, Olarn
Belka, Claus
Manapov, Farkhad
Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title_full Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title_fullStr Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title_short Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
title_sort implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage iii non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc)—a german radiation oncology survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420068
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25
work_keys_str_mv AT kasmannlukas implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey
AT ezechukwuka implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey
AT taugnerjulian implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey
AT roengvoraphojolarn implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey
AT belkaclaus implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey
AT manapovfarkhad implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey