Cargando…
Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey
BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420068 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25 |
_version_ | 1783534028412944384 |
---|---|
author | Käsmann, Lukas Eze, Chukwuka Taugner, Julian Roengvoraphoj, Olarn Belka, Claus Manapov, Farkhad |
author_facet | Käsmann, Lukas Eze, Chukwuka Taugner, Julian Roengvoraphoj, Olarn Belka, Claus Manapov, Farkhad |
author_sort | Käsmann, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management. METHODS: We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate. RESULTS: We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient’s ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7225149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72251492020-05-15 Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey Käsmann, Lukas Eze, Chukwuka Taugner, Julian Roengvoraphoj, Olarn Belka, Claus Manapov, Farkhad Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management. METHODS: We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate. RESULTS: We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient’s ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7225149/ /pubmed/32420068 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25 Text en 2020 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Käsmann, Lukas Eze, Chukwuka Taugner, Julian Roengvoraphoj, Olarn Belka, Claus Manapov, Farkhad Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title | Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title_full | Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title_fullStr | Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title_short | Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey |
title_sort | implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage iii non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc)—a german radiation oncology survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420068 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasmannlukas implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey AT ezechukwuka implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey AT taugnerjulian implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey AT roengvoraphojolarn implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey AT belkaclaus implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey AT manapovfarkhad implementationofdurvalumabmaintenancetreatmentafterconcurrentchemoradiotherapyininoperablestageiiinonsmallcelllungcancernsclcagermanradiationoncologysurvey |