Cargando…

Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay

Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of tox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sambri, Vittorio, Gateau, Cécile, Zannoli, Silvia, Dirani, Giorgio, Couturier, Jeanne, Op den Buijs, Ingrid, Roymans, René, Hallet, Emma, Arnold, Mihaela, Zumoberhaus, Anja, Steiner, Stanislava, van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen, Altwegg, Martin, Berlinger, Livia, Barbut, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32062723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4
_version_ 1783534035500269568
author Sambri, Vittorio
Gateau, Cécile
Zannoli, Silvia
Dirani, Giorgio
Couturier, Jeanne
Op den Buijs, Ingrid
Roymans, René
Hallet, Emma
Arnold, Mihaela
Zumoberhaus, Anja
Steiner, Stanislava
van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen
Altwegg, Martin
Berlinger, Livia
Barbut, Frédéric
author_facet Sambri, Vittorio
Gateau, Cécile
Zannoli, Silvia
Dirani, Giorgio
Couturier, Jeanne
Op den Buijs, Ingrid
Roymans, René
Hallet, Emma
Arnold, Mihaela
Zumoberhaus, Anja
Steiner, Stanislava
van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen
Altwegg, Martin
Berlinger, Livia
Barbut, Frédéric
author_sort Sambri, Vittorio
collection PubMed
description Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strains directly from stool specimens. In this multicenter evaluation, we determined the performance of the revogene C. difficile assay. The analysis was conducted on prospective stool specimens collected from six different sites in Europe. The performance of the revogene C. difficile assay was compared to the different routine diagnostic methods and, for a subset of the specimens, against toxigenic culture. In total, 2621 valid stool specimens were tested, and the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 97.1% [93.3–99.0] and 98.9% [98.5–99.3] for identification of Clostridioides difficile infection. Discrepancy analysis using additional methods improved this performance to 98.8% [95.8–99.9] and 99.6% [99.2–99.8], respectively. In comparison to toxigenic culture, the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 93.0% [86.1–97.1] and 99.5% [98.7–99.9], respectively. These results indicate that the revogene C. difficile assay is a robust and reliable aid in the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7225180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72251802020-05-15 Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay Sambri, Vittorio Gateau, Cécile Zannoli, Silvia Dirani, Giorgio Couturier, Jeanne Op den Buijs, Ingrid Roymans, René Hallet, Emma Arnold, Mihaela Zumoberhaus, Anja Steiner, Stanislava van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen Altwegg, Martin Berlinger, Livia Barbut, Frédéric Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strains directly from stool specimens. In this multicenter evaluation, we determined the performance of the revogene C. difficile assay. The analysis was conducted on prospective stool specimens collected from six different sites in Europe. The performance of the revogene C. difficile assay was compared to the different routine diagnostic methods and, for a subset of the specimens, against toxigenic culture. In total, 2621 valid stool specimens were tested, and the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 97.1% [93.3–99.0] and 98.9% [98.5–99.3] for identification of Clostridioides difficile infection. Discrepancy analysis using additional methods improved this performance to 98.8% [95.8–99.9] and 99.6% [99.2–99.8], respectively. In comparison to toxigenic culture, the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 93.0% [86.1–97.1] and 99.5% [98.7–99.9], respectively. These results indicate that the revogene C. difficile assay is a robust and reliable aid in the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7225180/ /pubmed/32062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sambri, Vittorio
Gateau, Cécile
Zannoli, Silvia
Dirani, Giorgio
Couturier, Jeanne
Op den Buijs, Ingrid
Roymans, René
Hallet, Emma
Arnold, Mihaela
Zumoberhaus, Anja
Steiner, Stanislava
van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen
Altwegg, Martin
Berlinger, Livia
Barbut, Frédéric
Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title_full Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title_fullStr Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title_short Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
title_sort diagnosing clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene c. difficile assay
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32062723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sambrivittorio diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT gateaucecile diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT zannolisilvia diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT diranigiorgio diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT couturierjeanne diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT opdenbuijsingrid diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT roymansrene diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT halletemma diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT arnoldmihaela diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT zumoberhausanja diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT steinerstanislava diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT vandebovenkampjeroen diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT altweggmartin diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT berlingerlivia diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT barbutfrederic diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay
AT diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay