Cargando…
Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of tox...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4 |
_version_ | 1783534035500269568 |
---|---|
author | Sambri, Vittorio Gateau, Cécile Zannoli, Silvia Dirani, Giorgio Couturier, Jeanne Op den Buijs, Ingrid Roymans, René Hallet, Emma Arnold, Mihaela Zumoberhaus, Anja Steiner, Stanislava van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen Altwegg, Martin Berlinger, Livia Barbut, Frédéric |
author_facet | Sambri, Vittorio Gateau, Cécile Zannoli, Silvia Dirani, Giorgio Couturier, Jeanne Op den Buijs, Ingrid Roymans, René Hallet, Emma Arnold, Mihaela Zumoberhaus, Anja Steiner, Stanislava van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen Altwegg, Martin Berlinger, Livia Barbut, Frédéric |
author_sort | Sambri, Vittorio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strains directly from stool specimens. In this multicenter evaluation, we determined the performance of the revogene C. difficile assay. The analysis was conducted on prospective stool specimens collected from six different sites in Europe. The performance of the revogene C. difficile assay was compared to the different routine diagnostic methods and, for a subset of the specimens, against toxigenic culture. In total, 2621 valid stool specimens were tested, and the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 97.1% [93.3–99.0] and 98.9% [98.5–99.3] for identification of Clostridioides difficile infection. Discrepancy analysis using additional methods improved this performance to 98.8% [95.8–99.9] and 99.6% [99.2–99.8], respectively. In comparison to toxigenic culture, the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 93.0% [86.1–97.1] and 99.5% [98.7–99.9], respectively. These results indicate that the revogene C. difficile assay is a robust and reliable aid in the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7225180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72251802020-05-15 Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay Sambri, Vittorio Gateau, Cécile Zannoli, Silvia Dirani, Giorgio Couturier, Jeanne Op den Buijs, Ingrid Roymans, René Hallet, Emma Arnold, Mihaela Zumoberhaus, Anja Steiner, Stanislava van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen Altwegg, Martin Berlinger, Livia Barbut, Frédéric Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Clostridioides difficile infections are a significant threat to our healthcare system, and rapid and accurate diagnostics are crucial to implement the necessary infection prevention and control measurements. Nucleic acid amplification tests are such reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strains directly from stool specimens. In this multicenter evaluation, we determined the performance of the revogene C. difficile assay. The analysis was conducted on prospective stool specimens collected from six different sites in Europe. The performance of the revogene C. difficile assay was compared to the different routine diagnostic methods and, for a subset of the specimens, against toxigenic culture. In total, 2621 valid stool specimens were tested, and the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 97.1% [93.3–99.0] and 98.9% [98.5–99.3] for identification of Clostridioides difficile infection. Discrepancy analysis using additional methods improved this performance to 98.8% [95.8–99.9] and 99.6% [99.2–99.8], respectively. In comparison to toxigenic culture, the revogene C. difficile assay displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 93.0% [86.1–97.1] and 99.5% [98.7–99.9], respectively. These results indicate that the revogene C. difficile assay is a robust and reliable aid in the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7225180/ /pubmed/32062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sambri, Vittorio Gateau, Cécile Zannoli, Silvia Dirani, Giorgio Couturier, Jeanne Op den Buijs, Ingrid Roymans, René Hallet, Emma Arnold, Mihaela Zumoberhaus, Anja Steiner, Stanislava van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen Altwegg, Martin Berlinger, Livia Barbut, Frédéric Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title | Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title_full | Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title_short | Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay |
title_sort | diagnosing clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene c. difficile assay |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03829-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sambrivittorio diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT gateaucecile diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT zannolisilvia diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT diranigiorgio diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT couturierjeanne diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT opdenbuijsingrid diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT roymansrene diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT halletemma diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT arnoldmihaela diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT zumoberhausanja diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT steinerstanislava diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT vandebovenkampjeroen diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT altweggmartin diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT berlingerlivia diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT barbutfrederic diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay AT diagnosingclostridioidesdifficileinfectionswithmoleculardiagnosticsmulticenterevaluationofrevogenecdifficileassay |