Cargando…
Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures
Fast identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance to supply an adequate therapy of bloodstream infections (BSI). There are several platforms providing molecular-based identification, detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, or even a full antimicrobi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5 |
_version_ | 1783534035858882560 |
---|---|
author | Oberhettinger, Philipp Zieger, Jan Autenrieth, Ingo Marschal, Matthias Peter, Silke |
author_facet | Oberhettinger, Philipp Zieger, Jan Autenrieth, Ingo Marschal, Matthias Peter, Silke |
author_sort | Oberhettinger, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fast identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance to supply an adequate therapy of bloodstream infections (BSI). There are several platforms providing molecular-based identification, detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, or even a full antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Two of such test systems allowing rapid diagnostics were assessed in this study: The Biofire FilmArray® and the Genmark ePlex®, both fully automated test system with a minimum of hands-on time. Overall 137 BSI episodes were included in our study and compared to conventional culture–based reference methods. The FilmArray® is using one catridge including a panel for the most common bacterial and fungal BSI pathogens as well as selected resistance markers. The ePlex® offers three different cartridges for detection of Gram-positives, Gram-negatives, and fungi resulting in a broader panel including also rare pathogens, putative contaminants, and more genetic resistance markers. The FilmArray® and ePlex® were evaluated for all 137 BSI episodes with FilmArray® detecting 119 and ePlex® detecting 128 of these. For targets on the respective panel of the system, the FilmArray® generated a sensitivity of 98.9% with 100% specificity on Gram-positive isolates. The ePlex® system generated a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 90.7% on Gram-positive isolates. In each case, the two systems performed with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of Gram-negative specimens covered by each panel. In summary, both evaluated test systems showed a satisfying overall performance for fast pathogen identification and are beneficial tools for accelerating blood culture diagnostics of sepsis patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7225181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72251812020-05-15 Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures Oberhettinger, Philipp Zieger, Jan Autenrieth, Ingo Marschal, Matthias Peter, Silke Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Fast identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance to supply an adequate therapy of bloodstream infections (BSI). There are several platforms providing molecular-based identification, detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, or even a full antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Two of such test systems allowing rapid diagnostics were assessed in this study: The Biofire FilmArray® and the Genmark ePlex®, both fully automated test system with a minimum of hands-on time. Overall 137 BSI episodes were included in our study and compared to conventional culture–based reference methods. The FilmArray® is using one catridge including a panel for the most common bacterial and fungal BSI pathogens as well as selected resistance markers. The ePlex® offers three different cartridges for detection of Gram-positives, Gram-negatives, and fungi resulting in a broader panel including also rare pathogens, putative contaminants, and more genetic resistance markers. The FilmArray® and ePlex® were evaluated for all 137 BSI episodes with FilmArray® detecting 119 and ePlex® detecting 128 of these. For targets on the respective panel of the system, the FilmArray® generated a sensitivity of 98.9% with 100% specificity on Gram-positive isolates. The ePlex® system generated a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 90.7% on Gram-positive isolates. In each case, the two systems performed with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of Gram-negative specimens covered by each panel. In summary, both evaluated test systems showed a satisfying overall performance for fast pathogen identification and are beneficial tools for accelerating blood culture diagnostics of sepsis patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7225181/ /pubmed/32020397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oberhettinger, Philipp Zieger, Jan Autenrieth, Ingo Marschal, Matthias Peter, Silke Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title | Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title_full | Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title_short | Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
title_sort | evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oberhettingerphilipp evaluationoftworapidmoleculartestsystemstoestablishanalgorithmforfastidentificationofbacterialpathogensfrompositivebloodcultures AT ziegerjan evaluationoftworapidmoleculartestsystemstoestablishanalgorithmforfastidentificationofbacterialpathogensfrompositivebloodcultures AT autenriethingo evaluationoftworapidmoleculartestsystemstoestablishanalgorithmforfastidentificationofbacterialpathogensfrompositivebloodcultures AT marschalmatthias evaluationoftworapidmoleculartestsystemstoestablishanalgorithmforfastidentificationofbacterialpathogensfrompositivebloodcultures AT petersilke evaluationoftworapidmoleculartestsystemstoestablishanalgorithmforfastidentificationofbacterialpathogensfrompositivebloodcultures |