Cargando…

Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients

BACKGROUND: This audit was aimed at studying current practices regarding the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the Indian critical care setup, with the background aim of raising awareness regarding the use and indications of SUP in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After registe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Divya, Bhalotra, Anju R, Singh, Rahil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368
_version_ 1783534136904908800
author Gupta, Divya
Bhalotra, Anju R
Singh, Rahil
author_facet Gupta, Divya
Bhalotra, Anju R
Singh, Rahil
author_sort Gupta, Divya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This audit was aimed at studying current practices regarding the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the Indian critical care setup, with the background aim of raising awareness regarding the use and indications of SUP in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After registering the trial with the clinical trial registry, India, a structured audit questionnaire containing 26 questions pertaining to SUP was distributed through electronic media among clinicians working in the intensive care units (ICUs) across India. Responses obtained were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 550 clinicians. Only 197 responded, of whom 91.4% were anesthesiologists, 5.6% were physicians, and 3% were intensivists. The audit revealed that 33% respondents were unaware of the existing SUP guidelines and around 32% did not have protocols for SUP in their ICU. Sixty-nine percent of respondents felt that all ICU patients must receive SUP and 44.7% opined that it should be started on ICU arrival. Almost 94% knew that early enteral feeding is protective against stress ulceration. Only 24.9% responders agreed that there must be clear indications for SUP, and most of them were unaware of all the potential side effects. Once initiated, 43.7% respondents would stop prophylaxis when no indication was left, whereas 69 respondents would stop on ICU discharge. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of awareness regarding initiation, choice of agent, adverse effects as well as termination of SUP in ICU and guidelines for the same. Institutional protocols should be in place and steps need to be taken to prevent unwarranted use. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Gupta D, Bhalotra AR, Singh R. Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(3):160–167.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7225769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72257692020-05-20 Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients Gupta, Divya Bhalotra, Anju R Singh, Rahil Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This audit was aimed at studying current practices regarding the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the Indian critical care setup, with the background aim of raising awareness regarding the use and indications of SUP in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After registering the trial with the clinical trial registry, India, a structured audit questionnaire containing 26 questions pertaining to SUP was distributed through electronic media among clinicians working in the intensive care units (ICUs) across India. Responses obtained were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 550 clinicians. Only 197 responded, of whom 91.4% were anesthesiologists, 5.6% were physicians, and 3% were intensivists. The audit revealed that 33% respondents were unaware of the existing SUP guidelines and around 32% did not have protocols for SUP in their ICU. Sixty-nine percent of respondents felt that all ICU patients must receive SUP and 44.7% opined that it should be started on ICU arrival. Almost 94% knew that early enteral feeding is protective against stress ulceration. Only 24.9% responders agreed that there must be clear indications for SUP, and most of them were unaware of all the potential side effects. Once initiated, 43.7% respondents would stop prophylaxis when no indication was left, whereas 69 respondents would stop on ICU discharge. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of awareness regarding initiation, choice of agent, adverse effects as well as termination of SUP in ICU and guidelines for the same. Institutional protocols should be in place and steps need to be taken to prevent unwarranted use. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Gupta D, Bhalotra AR, Singh R. Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(3):160–167. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7225769/ /pubmed/32435093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Divya
Bhalotra, Anju R
Singh, Rahil
Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_full Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_fullStr Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_full_unstemmed Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_short Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_sort audit on practices of stress ulcer prophylaxis in intensive care unit patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368
work_keys_str_mv AT guptadivya auditonpracticesofstressulcerprophylaxisinintensivecareunitpatients
AT bhalotraanjur auditonpracticesofstressulcerprophylaxisinintensivecareunitpatients
AT singhrahil auditonpracticesofstressulcerprophylaxisinintensivecareunitpatients