Cargando…

An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rades, Dirk, Nguyen, Trang, Janssen, Stefan, Schild, Steven E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235637
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833
_version_ 1783534224074080256
author Rades, Dirk
Nguyen, Trang
Janssen, Stefan
Schild, Steven E.
author_facet Rades, Dirk
Nguyen, Trang
Janssen, Stefan
Schild, Steven E.
author_sort Rades, Dirk
collection PubMed
description An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 patients receiving whole-brain irradiation. It included three groups identified from 6-month survival rates based on two independent predictors (performance status and absence/presence of non-cerebral metastases), with 6-month survival rates of 0% (0 points), 26% (1 point), and 75% (2 points), respectively. This score was compared to diagnosis-specific scores, namely the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), the Dziggel-Score and the WBRT-30-CRC (whole-brain radiotherapy with 30 Gy in 10 fractions for cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer) score and to a non-diagnosis-specific score for older persons (Evers-Score). Positive predictive values were 100% (new score), 87% (DS-GPA), 86% (Dziggel-Score), 91% (WBRT-30-CRC), and 100% (Evers-Score), respectively, for patients dying ≤6 months, and 75%, 33%, 75%, 60%, and 45%, respectively, for survivors ≥6 months. Of the five tools, the new score and the Evers-Score were most precise in identifying patients dying ≤6 months. The new score and the Dziggel-Scores were best at identifying patients surviving ≥6 months. When combining the results, the new score appeared preferable to the existing tools. The score appears not necessary for patients with additional liver metastases, since their 6-month survival rate was 0%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7226154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72261542020-05-18 An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Rades, Dirk Nguyen, Trang Janssen, Stefan Schild, Steven E. Cancers (Basel) Article An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 patients receiving whole-brain irradiation. It included three groups identified from 6-month survival rates based on two independent predictors (performance status and absence/presence of non-cerebral metastases), with 6-month survival rates of 0% (0 points), 26% (1 point), and 75% (2 points), respectively. This score was compared to diagnosis-specific scores, namely the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), the Dziggel-Score and the WBRT-30-CRC (whole-brain radiotherapy with 30 Gy in 10 fractions for cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer) score and to a non-diagnosis-specific score for older persons (Evers-Score). Positive predictive values were 100% (new score), 87% (DS-GPA), 86% (Dziggel-Score), 91% (WBRT-30-CRC), and 100% (Evers-Score), respectively, for patients dying ≤6 months, and 75%, 33%, 75%, 60%, and 45%, respectively, for survivors ≥6 months. Of the five tools, the new score and the Evers-Score were most precise in identifying patients dying ≤6 months. The new score and the Dziggel-Scores were best at identifying patients surviving ≥6 months. When combining the results, the new score appeared preferable to the existing tools. The score appears not necessary for patients with additional liver metastases, since their 6-month survival rate was 0%. MDPI 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7226154/ /pubmed/32235637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rades, Dirk
Nguyen, Trang
Janssen, Stefan
Schild, Steven E.
An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title_full An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title_short An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
title_sort easy-to-use survival score compared to existing tools for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235637
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833
work_keys_str_mv AT radesdirk aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT nguyentrang aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT janssenstefan aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT schildstevene aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT radesdirk easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT nguyentrang easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT janssenstefan easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT schildstevene easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer