Cargando…
An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833 |
_version_ | 1783534224074080256 |
---|---|
author | Rades, Dirk Nguyen, Trang Janssen, Stefan Schild, Steven E. |
author_facet | Rades, Dirk Nguyen, Trang Janssen, Stefan Schild, Steven E. |
author_sort | Rades, Dirk |
collection | PubMed |
description | An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 patients receiving whole-brain irradiation. It included three groups identified from 6-month survival rates based on two independent predictors (performance status and absence/presence of non-cerebral metastases), with 6-month survival rates of 0% (0 points), 26% (1 point), and 75% (2 points), respectively. This score was compared to diagnosis-specific scores, namely the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), the Dziggel-Score and the WBRT-30-CRC (whole-brain radiotherapy with 30 Gy in 10 fractions for cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer) score and to a non-diagnosis-specific score for older persons (Evers-Score). Positive predictive values were 100% (new score), 87% (DS-GPA), 86% (Dziggel-Score), 91% (WBRT-30-CRC), and 100% (Evers-Score), respectively, for patients dying ≤6 months, and 75%, 33%, 75%, 60%, and 45%, respectively, for survivors ≥6 months. Of the five tools, the new score and the Evers-Score were most precise in identifying patients dying ≤6 months. The new score and the Dziggel-Scores were best at identifying patients surviving ≥6 months. When combining the results, the new score appeared preferable to the existing tools. The score appears not necessary for patients with additional liver metastases, since their 6-month survival rate was 0%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7226154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72261542020-05-18 An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Rades, Dirk Nguyen, Trang Janssen, Stefan Schild, Steven E. Cancers (Basel) Article An easy-to-use survival score was developed specifically for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer, and was compared to existing tools regarding the accuracy of identifying patients who die in ≤6 months and those who survive for ≥6 months. The new score was built from 57 patients receiving whole-brain irradiation. It included three groups identified from 6-month survival rates based on two independent predictors (performance status and absence/presence of non-cerebral metastases), with 6-month survival rates of 0% (0 points), 26% (1 point), and 75% (2 points), respectively. This score was compared to diagnosis-specific scores, namely the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), the Dziggel-Score and the WBRT-30-CRC (whole-brain radiotherapy with 30 Gy in 10 fractions for cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer) score and to a non-diagnosis-specific score for older persons (Evers-Score). Positive predictive values were 100% (new score), 87% (DS-GPA), 86% (Dziggel-Score), 91% (WBRT-30-CRC), and 100% (Evers-Score), respectively, for patients dying ≤6 months, and 75%, 33%, 75%, 60%, and 45%, respectively, for survivors ≥6 months. Of the five tools, the new score and the Evers-Score were most precise in identifying patients dying ≤6 months. The new score and the Dziggel-Scores were best at identifying patients surviving ≥6 months. When combining the results, the new score appeared preferable to the existing tools. The score appears not necessary for patients with additional liver metastases, since their 6-month survival rate was 0%. MDPI 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7226154/ /pubmed/32235637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rades, Dirk Nguyen, Trang Janssen, Stefan Schild, Steven E. An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title | An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | An Easy-To-Use Survival Score Compared to Existing Tools for Older Patients with Cerebral Metastases from Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | easy-to-use survival score compared to existing tools for older patients with cerebral metastases from colorectal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radesdirk aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT nguyentrang aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT janssenstefan aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT schildstevene aneasytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT radesdirk easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT nguyentrang easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT janssenstefan easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer AT schildstevene easytousesurvivalscorecomparedtoexistingtoolsforolderpatientswithcerebralmetastasesfromcolorectalcancer |