Cargando…
Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1
The contribution of recently established or candidate susceptibility genes to melanoma missing heritability has yet to be determined. Multigene panel testing could increase diagnostic yield and better define the role of candidate genes. We characterized 273 CDKN2A/ARF and CDK4-negative probands thro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12041007 |
_version_ | 1783534304421216256 |
---|---|
author | Pastorino, Lorenza Andreotti, Virginia Dalmasso, Bruna Vanni, Irene Ciccarese, Giulia Mandalà, Mario Spadola, Giuseppe Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta Ponti, Giovanni Tibiletti, Maria Grazia Sala, Elena Genuardi, Maurizio Chiurazzi, Pietro Maccanti, Gabriele Manoukian, Siranoush Sestini, Serena Danesi, Rita Zampiga, Valentina La Starza, Roberta Stanganelli, Ignazio Ballestrero, Alberto Mastracci, Luca Grillo, Federica Sciallero, Stefania Cecchi, Federica Tanda, Enrica Teresa Spagnolo, Francesco Queirolo, Paola Goldstein, Alisa M. Bruno, William Ghiorzo, Paola |
author_facet | Pastorino, Lorenza Andreotti, Virginia Dalmasso, Bruna Vanni, Irene Ciccarese, Giulia Mandalà, Mario Spadola, Giuseppe Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta Ponti, Giovanni Tibiletti, Maria Grazia Sala, Elena Genuardi, Maurizio Chiurazzi, Pietro Maccanti, Gabriele Manoukian, Siranoush Sestini, Serena Danesi, Rita Zampiga, Valentina La Starza, Roberta Stanganelli, Ignazio Ballestrero, Alberto Mastracci, Luca Grillo, Federica Sciallero, Stefania Cecchi, Federica Tanda, Enrica Teresa Spagnolo, Francesco Queirolo, Paola Goldstein, Alisa M. Bruno, William Ghiorzo, Paola |
author_sort | Pastorino, Lorenza |
collection | PubMed |
description | The contribution of recently established or candidate susceptibility genes to melanoma missing heritability has yet to be determined. Multigene panel testing could increase diagnostic yield and better define the role of candidate genes. We characterized 273 CDKN2A/ARF and CDK4-negative probands through a custom-designed targeted gene panel that included CDKN2A/ARF, CDK4, ACD, BAP1, MITF, POT1, TERF2IP, ATM, and PALB2. Co-segregation, loss of heterozygosity (LOH)/protein expression analysis, and splicing characterization were performed to improve variant classification. We identified 16 (5.9%) pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in established high/medium penetrance cutaneous melanoma susceptibility genes (BAP1, POT1, ACD, MITF, and TERF2IP), including two novel variants in BAP1 and 4 in POT1. We also found four deleterious and five likely deleterious variants in ATM (3.3%). Thus, including potentially deleterious variants in ATM increased the diagnostic yield to about 9%. Inclusion of rare variants of uncertain significance would increase the overall detection yield to 14%. At least 10% of melanoma missing heritability may be explained through panel testing in our population. To our knowledge, this is the highest frequency of putative ATM deleterious variants reported in melanoma families, suggesting a possible role in melanoma susceptibility, which needs further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7226507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72265072020-05-18 Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 Pastorino, Lorenza Andreotti, Virginia Dalmasso, Bruna Vanni, Irene Ciccarese, Giulia Mandalà, Mario Spadola, Giuseppe Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta Ponti, Giovanni Tibiletti, Maria Grazia Sala, Elena Genuardi, Maurizio Chiurazzi, Pietro Maccanti, Gabriele Manoukian, Siranoush Sestini, Serena Danesi, Rita Zampiga, Valentina La Starza, Roberta Stanganelli, Ignazio Ballestrero, Alberto Mastracci, Luca Grillo, Federica Sciallero, Stefania Cecchi, Federica Tanda, Enrica Teresa Spagnolo, Francesco Queirolo, Paola Goldstein, Alisa M. Bruno, William Ghiorzo, Paola Cancers (Basel) Article The contribution of recently established or candidate susceptibility genes to melanoma missing heritability has yet to be determined. Multigene panel testing could increase diagnostic yield and better define the role of candidate genes. We characterized 273 CDKN2A/ARF and CDK4-negative probands through a custom-designed targeted gene panel that included CDKN2A/ARF, CDK4, ACD, BAP1, MITF, POT1, TERF2IP, ATM, and PALB2. Co-segregation, loss of heterozygosity (LOH)/protein expression analysis, and splicing characterization were performed to improve variant classification. We identified 16 (5.9%) pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in established high/medium penetrance cutaneous melanoma susceptibility genes (BAP1, POT1, ACD, MITF, and TERF2IP), including two novel variants in BAP1 and 4 in POT1. We also found four deleterious and five likely deleterious variants in ATM (3.3%). Thus, including potentially deleterious variants in ATM increased the diagnostic yield to about 9%. Inclusion of rare variants of uncertain significance would increase the overall detection yield to 14%. At least 10% of melanoma missing heritability may be explained through panel testing in our population. To our knowledge, this is the highest frequency of putative ATM deleterious variants reported in melanoma families, suggesting a possible role in melanoma susceptibility, which needs further investigation. MDPI 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7226507/ /pubmed/32325837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12041007 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pastorino, Lorenza Andreotti, Virginia Dalmasso, Bruna Vanni, Irene Ciccarese, Giulia Mandalà, Mario Spadola, Giuseppe Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta Ponti, Giovanni Tibiletti, Maria Grazia Sala, Elena Genuardi, Maurizio Chiurazzi, Pietro Maccanti, Gabriele Manoukian, Siranoush Sestini, Serena Danesi, Rita Zampiga, Valentina La Starza, Roberta Stanganelli, Ignazio Ballestrero, Alberto Mastracci, Luca Grillo, Federica Sciallero, Stefania Cecchi, Federica Tanda, Enrica Teresa Spagnolo, Francesco Queirolo, Paola Goldstein, Alisa M. Bruno, William Ghiorzo, Paola Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title | Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title_full | Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title_fullStr | Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title_short | Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Melanoma by Gene Panel Testing: Potential Pathogenic Variants in ACD, ATM, BAP1, and POT1 |
title_sort | insights into genetic susceptibility to melanoma by gene panel testing: potential pathogenic variants in acd, atm, bap1, and pot1 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12041007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pastorinolorenza insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT andreottivirginia insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT dalmassobruna insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT vanniirene insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT ciccaresegiulia insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT mandalamario insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT spadolagiuseppe insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT pizzichettamariaantonietta insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT pontigiovanni insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT tibilettimariagrazia insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT salaelena insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT genuardimaurizio insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT chiurazzipietro insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT maccantigabriele insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT manoukiansiranoush insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT sestiniserena insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT danesirita insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT zampigavalentina insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT lastarzaroberta insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT stanganelliignazio insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT ballestreroalberto insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT mastracciluca insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT grillofederica insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT sciallerostefania insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT cecchifederica insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT tandaenricateresa insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT spagnolofrancesco insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT queirolopaola insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT goldsteinalisam insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT brunowilliam insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 AT ghiorzopaola insightsintogeneticsusceptibilitytomelanomabygenepaneltestingpotentialpathogenicvariantsinacdatmbap1andpot1 |