Cargando…
Interpretation of within-group change in randomised trials
In medicine, it is common to observe improvement after intervention, at least partly because patients present for care in extremis and would have improved without intervention. Controlling for this counterfactual explanation for improvement is the principle reason to conduct a trial in which patient...
Autor principal: | Kypri, Kypros |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02641-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Regression to the mean and alcohol consumption: A cohort study exploring implications for the interpretation of change in control groups in brief intervention trials()
por: McCambridge, Jim, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Deception in Research Is Morally Problematic … and so too Is Not Using It Morally: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Use of Deception in Public Health Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Case Study of Three Online Alcohol Trials”
por: McCambridge, Jim, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials
por: McCambridge, Jim, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
por: Schulz, Kenneth F, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trials()
por: McCambridge, Jim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)