Cargando…

Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of soil carbon (C) pools across land uses can be confounded by site-specific history. To better quantify the response of soil C pools to residential development and use, we compared yard soils (n = 20) to adjacent mown fields and second-growth forests within land-use clusters...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peach, Morgan E., Ogden, Laura A., Mora, Eleni A., Friedland, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31420807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-019-0124-x
_version_ 1783534435157671936
author Peach, Morgan E.
Ogden, Laura A.
Mora, Eleni A.
Friedland, Andrew J.
author_facet Peach, Morgan E.
Ogden, Laura A.
Mora, Eleni A.
Friedland, Andrew J.
author_sort Peach, Morgan E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparisons of soil carbon (C) pools across land uses can be confounded by site-specific history. To better quantify the response of soil C pools to residential development and use, we compared yard soils (n = 20) to adjacent mown fields and second-growth forests within land-use clusters (LUC; n = 12). Land uses within clusters shared site-specific legacies (land use and other soil forming history) prior to residential development (15–227 years ago). We analyzed soil cores to 60-cm depth for carbon, nitrogen, and bulk density. Within one LUC, we monitored soil dissolved organic carbon, moisture, and thermal regimes to explain soil C dynamics. RESULTS: We accounted for pre-development legacies to test how present uses affect soil properties. We found that yard soil C pools to 60-cm depth (9.07 ± 0.32 kg C m(−2); mean ± SE) were smaller than fields (10.26 ± 0.44 kg C m(−2)) and forests (10.62 ± 0.87 kg C m(−2)). Fields contained more nitrogen to 60-cm depth (0.78 ± 0.043 kg N m(−2)) than yards (0.68 ± 0.030 kg N m(−2)) and forests (0.69 ± 0.057 kg N m(−2)). Time since development predicted decreased yard and field soil C/N, field soil N accumulation, and reduced yard bulk density. In old yards (> 150 years), where residents in recent times mowed monthly to bimonthly and left clippings on the lawn, there was evidence of soil C and N gains relative to old commercially managed yards mown weekly with clippings exported. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests land conversion to yard can limit soil C pools for centuries, with contemporary management key to that trajectory. Our research points to the importance of accounting for pre-development legacies to reveal the response of soil properties to land conversion and present use. This work can inform policies and land use intended to enhance the soil C sink and minimize development-related soil C losses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13021-019-0124-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7227114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72271142020-05-27 Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries Peach, Morgan E. Ogden, Laura A. Mora, Eleni A. Friedland, Andrew J. Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: Comparisons of soil carbon (C) pools across land uses can be confounded by site-specific history. To better quantify the response of soil C pools to residential development and use, we compared yard soils (n = 20) to adjacent mown fields and second-growth forests within land-use clusters (LUC; n = 12). Land uses within clusters shared site-specific legacies (land use and other soil forming history) prior to residential development (15–227 years ago). We analyzed soil cores to 60-cm depth for carbon, nitrogen, and bulk density. Within one LUC, we monitored soil dissolved organic carbon, moisture, and thermal regimes to explain soil C dynamics. RESULTS: We accounted for pre-development legacies to test how present uses affect soil properties. We found that yard soil C pools to 60-cm depth (9.07 ± 0.32 kg C m(−2); mean ± SE) were smaller than fields (10.26 ± 0.44 kg C m(−2)) and forests (10.62 ± 0.87 kg C m(−2)). Fields contained more nitrogen to 60-cm depth (0.78 ± 0.043 kg N m(−2)) than yards (0.68 ± 0.030 kg N m(−2)) and forests (0.69 ± 0.057 kg N m(−2)). Time since development predicted decreased yard and field soil C/N, field soil N accumulation, and reduced yard bulk density. In old yards (> 150 years), where residents in recent times mowed monthly to bimonthly and left clippings on the lawn, there was evidence of soil C and N gains relative to old commercially managed yards mown weekly with clippings exported. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests land conversion to yard can limit soil C pools for centuries, with contemporary management key to that trajectory. Our research points to the importance of accounting for pre-development legacies to reveal the response of soil properties to land conversion and present use. This work can inform policies and land use intended to enhance the soil C sink and minimize development-related soil C losses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13021-019-0124-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7227114/ /pubmed/31420807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-019-0124-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Peach, Morgan E.
Ogden, Laura A.
Mora, Eleni A.
Friedland, Andrew J.
Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title_full Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title_fullStr Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title_full_unstemmed Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title_short Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
title_sort building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31420807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-019-0124-x
work_keys_str_mv AT peachmorgane buildinghousesandmanaginglawnscouldlimityardsoilcarbonforcenturies
AT ogdenlauraa buildinghousesandmanaginglawnscouldlimityardsoilcarbonforcenturies
AT moraelenia buildinghousesandmanaginglawnscouldlimityardsoilcarbonforcenturies
AT friedlandandrewj buildinghousesandmanaginglawnscouldlimityardsoilcarbonforcenturies