Cargando…

Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study

BACKGROUND: Immobilization with cervical spine worsens endotracheal intubation condition. Though various intubation devices have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in patients with cervical spin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Kwon Hui, Kim, Kyung Mi, John, Hyunji, Jun, Joo Hyun, Han, Minsoo, Kim, Soyoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x
_version_ 1783534435644211200
author Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, Kyung Mi
John, Hyunji
Jun, Joo Hyun
Han, Minsoo
Kim, Soyoun
author_facet Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, Kyung Mi
John, Hyunji
Jun, Joo Hyun
Han, Minsoo
Kim, Soyoun
author_sort Seo, Kwon Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immobilization with cervical spine worsens endotracheal intubation condition. Though various intubation devices have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in patients with cervical spine immobilization. The present study compared the performance of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope with the McCoy laryngoscope for NTI in patients with simulated cervical spine injuries. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, study done in a tertiary hospital. Ninety-five patients requiring NTI were included in data analysis: McCoy group (group M, n = 47) or C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 48). A Philadelphia neck collar was applied before anesthetic induction to immobilize the cervical spine. Single experienced anesthesiologist performed NTI. The primary outcome was duration of intubation divided by three steps: nose to oropharynx; oropharynx into glottic inlet; and glottic inlet to trachea. Secondary outcomes included glottic view as percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score and Cormack-Lehance (CL) grade, modified nasal intubation-difficulty scale (NIDS) rating, hemodynamic changes before and after intubation, and complications. RESULTS: Total intubation duration was significantly shorter in group C (39.5 ± 11.4 s) compared to group M (48.1 ± 13.9 s). Group C required significantly less time for glottic visualization and endotracheal tube placement in the trachea. More patients in group C had CL grade I and higher POGO scores (P <  0.001, for both measures). No difficulty in NTI (modified NIDS = 0) was more in group C than group M. Hemodynamic changes and incidence of complications were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope is an effective tool for NTI in a simulated difficult airway, which improves glottic visualization and shortens intubation time relative to those with McCoy laryngoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health, Identification number: KCT 0004535, Registered December 10, 2019, Retrospectively registered, http://cris.nih.go.kr.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7227116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72271162020-05-27 Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, Kyung Mi John, Hyunji Jun, Joo Hyun Han, Minsoo Kim, Soyoun BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Immobilization with cervical spine worsens endotracheal intubation condition. Though various intubation devices have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in patients with cervical spine immobilization. The present study compared the performance of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope with the McCoy laryngoscope for NTI in patients with simulated cervical spine injuries. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, study done in a tertiary hospital. Ninety-five patients requiring NTI were included in data analysis: McCoy group (group M, n = 47) or C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 48). A Philadelphia neck collar was applied before anesthetic induction to immobilize the cervical spine. Single experienced anesthesiologist performed NTI. The primary outcome was duration of intubation divided by three steps: nose to oropharynx; oropharynx into glottic inlet; and glottic inlet to trachea. Secondary outcomes included glottic view as percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score and Cormack-Lehance (CL) grade, modified nasal intubation-difficulty scale (NIDS) rating, hemodynamic changes before and after intubation, and complications. RESULTS: Total intubation duration was significantly shorter in group C (39.5 ± 11.4 s) compared to group M (48.1 ± 13.9 s). Group C required significantly less time for glottic visualization and endotracheal tube placement in the trachea. More patients in group C had CL grade I and higher POGO scores (P <  0.001, for both measures). No difficulty in NTI (modified NIDS = 0) was more in group C than group M. Hemodynamic changes and incidence of complications were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope is an effective tool for NTI in a simulated difficult airway, which improves glottic visualization and shortens intubation time relative to those with McCoy laryngoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health, Identification number: KCT 0004535, Registered December 10, 2019, Retrospectively registered, http://cris.nih.go.kr. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7227116/ /pubmed/32408862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, Kyung Mi
John, Hyunji
Jun, Joo Hyun
Han, Minsoo
Kim, Soyoun
Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title_full Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title_fullStr Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title_short Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
title_sort comparison of c-mac d-blade videolaryngoscope and mccoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x
work_keys_str_mv AT seokwonhui comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT kimkyungmi comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT johnhyunji comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT junjoohyun comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT hanminsoo comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT kimsoyoun comparisonofcmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandmccoylaryngoscopeefficacyfornasotrachealintubationinsimulatedcervicalspinalinjuryaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy