Cargando…

Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal status of neonates delivered by assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) versus second-stage caesarean birth (CS). METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS® version 25.0 statistical software using descrip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eze, Paul, Lawani, Lucky Osaheni, Chikezie, Raphael Ugochukwu, Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikechi, Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02995-9
_version_ 1783534475745951744
author Eze, Paul
Lawani, Lucky Osaheni
Chikezie, Raphael Ugochukwu
Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikechi
Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony
author_facet Eze, Paul
Lawani, Lucky Osaheni
Chikezie, Raphael Ugochukwu
Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikechi
Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony
author_sort Eze, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal status of neonates delivered by assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) versus second-stage caesarean birth (CS). METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS® version 25.0 statistical software using descriptive/inferential statistics. RESULTS: A total of 559 births met the inclusion criteria; AVD (211; 37.7%) and second-stage CS (348; 62.3%). Over 80% of the women were aged 20–34 years: 185 (87.7%) for the AVD group, and 301 (86.5%) for the second-stage CS group. More than half of the women were parous: 106 (50.2%) for the AVD group, and 184 (52.9%) for the second-stage CS group. The commonest indication for intervention in both groups is delayed second stage: 178 (84.4%) in the AVD group, and 239 (68.9%) in the second-stage CS group. There was a statistically significant difference in decision to delivery interval (DDI) between both groups: 197 (93.4%) women in the AVD group had DDI of less than 30 min and 21 women (6.0%) in the CS group had a DDI of less than 30 min (p <  0.001). During the DDI, there were 3 (1.4%) intra-uterine foetal deaths (IUFD) in the AVD and 19 (5.5%) in the CS group (p = 0.023). After adjusting for co-variates, there were statistically significant differences between the AVD and CS groups in the foetal death during DDI (p = 0.029) and perinatal deaths (p = 0.040); but no statistically significant differences in severe perinatal outcomes (p = 0.811), APGAR scores at 5th minutes (p = 0.355), and admission into the NICU (p = 0.946). After adjusting for co-variates, use of AVD was significantly associated with the level of experience of the care provider, with resident (junior) doctors less likely to opt for AVD than CS (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29–0.70). CONCLUSION: Second-stage CS when compared with AVD was not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. AVD is a practical option for reducing the rising Caesarean delivery rates without compromising the clinical status of the newborn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7227301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72273012020-05-27 Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis Eze, Paul Lawani, Lucky Osaheni Chikezie, Raphael Ugochukwu Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikechi Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal status of neonates delivered by assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) versus second-stage caesarean birth (CS). METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS® version 25.0 statistical software using descriptive/inferential statistics. RESULTS: A total of 559 births met the inclusion criteria; AVD (211; 37.7%) and second-stage CS (348; 62.3%). Over 80% of the women were aged 20–34 years: 185 (87.7%) for the AVD group, and 301 (86.5%) for the second-stage CS group. More than half of the women were parous: 106 (50.2%) for the AVD group, and 184 (52.9%) for the second-stage CS group. The commonest indication for intervention in both groups is delayed second stage: 178 (84.4%) in the AVD group, and 239 (68.9%) in the second-stage CS group. There was a statistically significant difference in decision to delivery interval (DDI) between both groups: 197 (93.4%) women in the AVD group had DDI of less than 30 min and 21 women (6.0%) in the CS group had a DDI of less than 30 min (p <  0.001). During the DDI, there were 3 (1.4%) intra-uterine foetal deaths (IUFD) in the AVD and 19 (5.5%) in the CS group (p = 0.023). After adjusting for co-variates, there were statistically significant differences between the AVD and CS groups in the foetal death during DDI (p = 0.029) and perinatal deaths (p = 0.040); but no statistically significant differences in severe perinatal outcomes (p = 0.811), APGAR scores at 5th minutes (p = 0.355), and admission into the NICU (p = 0.946). After adjusting for co-variates, use of AVD was significantly associated with the level of experience of the care provider, with resident (junior) doctors less likely to opt for AVD than CS (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29–0.70). CONCLUSION: Second-stage CS when compared with AVD was not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. AVD is a practical option for reducing the rising Caesarean delivery rates without compromising the clinical status of the newborn. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7227301/ /pubmed/32410592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02995-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eze, Paul
Lawani, Lucky Osaheni
Chikezie, Raphael Ugochukwu
Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikechi
Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony
Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title_full Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title_short Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria – a retrospective analysis
title_sort perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, nigeria – a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02995-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ezepaul perinataloutcomesofbabiesdeliveredbysecondstagecaesareansectionversusvacuumextractioninaresourcepoorsettingnigeriaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT lawaniluckyosaheni perinataloutcomesofbabiesdeliveredbysecondstagecaesareansectionversusvacuumextractioninaresourcepoorsettingnigeriaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT chikezieraphaelugochukwu perinataloutcomesofbabiesdeliveredbysecondstagecaesareansectionversusvacuumextractioninaresourcepoorsettingnigeriaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ukaegbechukwuemekaikechi perinataloutcomesofbabiesdeliveredbysecondstagecaesareansectionversusvacuumextractioninaresourcepoorsettingnigeriaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT iyokechukwuemekaanthony perinataloutcomesofbabiesdeliveredbysecondstagecaesareansectionversusvacuumextractioninaresourcepoorsettingnigeriaaretrospectiveanalysis