Cargando…

Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone

BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walsh, William Robert, Pelletier, Matthew Henry, Bertollo, Nicky, Lovric, Vedran, Wang, Tian, Morberg, Per, Parr, William Chase Harington, Bergadano, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5
_version_ 1783534480935354368
author Walsh, William Robert
Pelletier, Matthew Henry
Bertollo, Nicky
Lovric, Vedran
Wang, Tian
Morberg, Per
Parr, William Chase Harington
Bergadano, Dario
author_facet Walsh, William Robert
Pelletier, Matthew Henry
Bertollo, Nicky
Lovric, Vedran
Wang, Tian
Morberg, Per
Parr, William Chase Harington
Bergadano, Dario
author_sort Walsh, William Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo performance related to bone ongrowth and implant fixation. METHODS: A large animal model was used to compare the in vivo response of HA and plasma-sprayed titanium coatings in a well-reported adult ovine model to evaluate bone ongrowth in terms of mechanical properties in cortical sites, and histology and histomorphometry in cortical and cancellous sites at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Titanium plasma-sprayed surfaces outperformed the HA-coated samples in push-out testing in cortical sites while both surfaces supported new bone ongrowth and remodeling in cortical and cancellous sites. CONCLUSIONS: While both HA and Ti plasma provided an osteoconductive surface for bone ongrowth, the Ti plasma provided a more robust bone-implant interface that ideally would be required for load transfer and implant stability in the longer term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7227327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72273272020-05-27 Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone Walsh, William Robert Pelletier, Matthew Henry Bertollo, Nicky Lovric, Vedran Wang, Tian Morberg, Per Parr, William Chase Harington Bergadano, Dario J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo performance related to bone ongrowth and implant fixation. METHODS: A large animal model was used to compare the in vivo response of HA and plasma-sprayed titanium coatings in a well-reported adult ovine model to evaluate bone ongrowth in terms of mechanical properties in cortical sites, and histology and histomorphometry in cortical and cancellous sites at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Titanium plasma-sprayed surfaces outperformed the HA-coated samples in push-out testing in cortical sites while both surfaces supported new bone ongrowth and remodeling in cortical and cancellous sites. CONCLUSIONS: While both HA and Ti plasma provided an osteoconductive surface for bone ongrowth, the Ti plasma provided a more robust bone-implant interface that ideally would be required for load transfer and implant stability in the longer term. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7227327/ /pubmed/32408885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walsh, William Robert
Pelletier, Matthew Henry
Bertollo, Nicky
Lovric, Vedran
Wang, Tian
Morberg, Per
Parr, William Chase Harington
Bergadano, Dario
Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title_full Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title_fullStr Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title_full_unstemmed Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title_short Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
title_sort bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5
work_keys_str_mv AT walshwilliamrobert boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT pelletiermatthewhenry boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT bertollonicky boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT lovricvedran boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT wangtian boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT morbergper boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT parrwilliamchaseharington boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone
AT bergadanodario boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone