Cargando…
Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone
BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5 |
_version_ | 1783534480935354368 |
---|---|
author | Walsh, William Robert Pelletier, Matthew Henry Bertollo, Nicky Lovric, Vedran Wang, Tian Morberg, Per Parr, William Chase Harington Bergadano, Dario |
author_facet | Walsh, William Robert Pelletier, Matthew Henry Bertollo, Nicky Lovric, Vedran Wang, Tian Morberg, Per Parr, William Chase Harington Bergadano, Dario |
author_sort | Walsh, William Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo performance related to bone ongrowth and implant fixation. METHODS: A large animal model was used to compare the in vivo response of HA and plasma-sprayed titanium coatings in a well-reported adult ovine model to evaluate bone ongrowth in terms of mechanical properties in cortical sites, and histology and histomorphometry in cortical and cancellous sites at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Titanium plasma-sprayed surfaces outperformed the HA-coated samples in push-out testing in cortical sites while both surfaces supported new bone ongrowth and remodeling in cortical and cancellous sites. CONCLUSIONS: While both HA and Ti plasma provided an osteoconductive surface for bone ongrowth, the Ti plasma provided a more robust bone-implant interface that ideally would be required for load transfer and implant stability in the longer term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7227327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72273272020-05-27 Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone Walsh, William Robert Pelletier, Matthew Henry Bertollo, Nicky Lovric, Vedran Wang, Tian Morberg, Per Parr, William Chase Harington Bergadano, Dario J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: What is the right surface for an implant to achieve biological fixation? Surface technologies can play important roles in encouraging interactions between the implant surface and the host bone to achieve osseointegration. Preclinical animal models provide important insight into in vivo performance related to bone ongrowth and implant fixation. METHODS: A large animal model was used to compare the in vivo response of HA and plasma-sprayed titanium coatings in a well-reported adult ovine model to evaluate bone ongrowth in terms of mechanical properties in cortical sites, and histology and histomorphometry in cortical and cancellous sites at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Titanium plasma-sprayed surfaces outperformed the HA-coated samples in push-out testing in cortical sites while both surfaces supported new bone ongrowth and remodeling in cortical and cancellous sites. CONCLUSIONS: While both HA and Ti plasma provided an osteoconductive surface for bone ongrowth, the Ti plasma provided a more robust bone-implant interface that ideally would be required for load transfer and implant stability in the longer term. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7227327/ /pubmed/32408885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walsh, William Robert Pelletier, Matthew Henry Bertollo, Nicky Lovric, Vedran Wang, Tian Morberg, Per Parr, William Chase Harington Bergadano, Dario Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title | Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title_full | Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title_fullStr | Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title_short | Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
title_sort | bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshwilliamrobert boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT pelletiermatthewhenry boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT bertollonicky boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT lovricvedran boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT wangtian boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT morbergper boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT parrwilliamchaseharington boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone AT bergadanodario boneongrowthandmechanicalfixationofimplantsincorticalandcancellousbone |