Cargando…
Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective
A number of live-attenuated varicella vaccines are produced globally that provide protection against the varicella zoster virus. In Mexico, varicella vaccination is not included in the national immunization program and is recommended for use only in high-risk subgroups. We developed a budget impact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31567045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1672491 |
_version_ | 1783534540447285248 |
---|---|
author | Graham, Jonathan Wolfson, Lara J. Kyle, Jeffrey Bolde-Villarreal, Carlos Perez Guarneros-DeRegil, Diana B Monsanto, Homero Pillsbury, Matthew Talbird, Sandra Daniels, Vincent J. |
author_facet | Graham, Jonathan Wolfson, Lara J. Kyle, Jeffrey Bolde-Villarreal, Carlos Perez Guarneros-DeRegil, Diana B Monsanto, Homero Pillsbury, Matthew Talbird, Sandra Daniels, Vincent J. |
author_sort | Graham, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | A number of live-attenuated varicella vaccines are produced globally that provide protection against the varicella zoster virus. In Mexico, varicella vaccination is not included in the national immunization program and is recommended for use only in high-risk subgroups. We developed a budget impact model to estimate the impact of universal childhood immunization against varicella on the national payer system in Mexico. A scenario of no varicella vaccination was compared to scenarios with vaccination with a single dose at 13 months of age, in alignment with the existing program of immunization with the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Nine different vaccination scenarios were envisioned, differing by vaccine type and by coverage. Varicella cases and treatment costs of each scenario were computed in a dynamic transmission model of varicella epidemiology, calibrated to the population of Mexico. Unit costs were based on Mexico sources or were from the literature. The results indicated that each of the three vaccine types increased vaccine acquisition and administration expenditures but produced overall cost savings in each of the first 10 years of the program, due to fewer cases and reduced varicella treatment costs. A highly effective vaccine at 95% coverage produced the greatest cost savings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7227656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72276562020-05-20 Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective Graham, Jonathan Wolfson, Lara J. Kyle, Jeffrey Bolde-Villarreal, Carlos Perez Guarneros-DeRegil, Diana B Monsanto, Homero Pillsbury, Matthew Talbird, Sandra Daniels, Vincent J. Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper A number of live-attenuated varicella vaccines are produced globally that provide protection against the varicella zoster virus. In Mexico, varicella vaccination is not included in the national immunization program and is recommended for use only in high-risk subgroups. We developed a budget impact model to estimate the impact of universal childhood immunization against varicella on the national payer system in Mexico. A scenario of no varicella vaccination was compared to scenarios with vaccination with a single dose at 13 months of age, in alignment with the existing program of immunization with the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Nine different vaccination scenarios were envisioned, differing by vaccine type and by coverage. Varicella cases and treatment costs of each scenario were computed in a dynamic transmission model of varicella epidemiology, calibrated to the population of Mexico. Unit costs were based on Mexico sources or were from the literature. The results indicated that each of the three vaccine types increased vaccine acquisition and administration expenditures but produced overall cost savings in each of the first 10 years of the program, due to fewer cases and reduced varicella treatment costs. A highly effective vaccine at 95% coverage produced the greatest cost savings. Taylor & Francis 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7227656/ /pubmed/31567045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1672491 Text en © 2019 Merck Shark & Dohme Corp. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Graham, Jonathan Wolfson, Lara J. Kyle, Jeffrey Bolde-Villarreal, Carlos Perez Guarneros-DeRegil, Diana B Monsanto, Homero Pillsbury, Matthew Talbird, Sandra Daniels, Vincent J. Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title | Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title_full | Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title_fullStr | Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title_short | Budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a Mexico perspective |
title_sort | budget impact analysis of multiple varicella vaccination strategies: a mexico perspective |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31567045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1672491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahamjonathan budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT wolfsonlaraj budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT kylejeffrey budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT boldevillarrealcarlosperez budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT guarnerosderegildianab budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT monsantohomero budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT pillsburymatthew budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT talbirdsandra budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective AT danielsvincentj budgetimpactanalysisofmultiplevaricellavaccinationstrategiesamexicoperspective |