Cargando…

Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?

BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smythe, Tracey, Nogaro, Marie-Caroline, Clifton, Laura J., Mudariki, Debra, Theologis, Tim, Lavy, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32413066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878
_version_ 1783534579816071168
author Smythe, Tracey
Nogaro, Marie-Caroline
Clifton, Laura J.
Mudariki, Debra
Theologis, Tim
Lavy, Chris
author_facet Smythe, Tracey
Nogaro, Marie-Caroline
Clifton, Laura J.
Mudariki, Debra
Theologis, Tim
Lavy, Chris
author_sort Smythe, Tracey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of photographic images of patients with clubfoot in assessing outcome following treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre diagnostic accuracy study, we included all children with clubfoot from a cohort treated between 2011 and 2013, in 2017. Two physiotherapists trained in clubfoot management calculated the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) score for each child to decide if treatment was successful or if further treatment was required. Photographic images were then taken of 79 feet. Two blinded orthopaedic surgeons assessed three sets of images of each foot (n = 237 in total) at two time points (two months apart). Treatment for each foot was rated as ‘success’, ‘borderline’ or ‘failure’. Intra- and inter-observer variation for the photographic image was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the photographic image compared to the ACT score. RESULTS: There was perfect correlation between clinical assessment and photographic evaluation of both raters at both time-points in 38 (48%) feet. The raters demonstrated acceptable reliability with re-scoring photographs (rater 1, k = 0.55; rater 2, k = 0.88). Thirty percent (n = 71) of photographs were assessed as poor quality image or sub-optimal patient position. Sensitivity of outcome with photograph compared to ACT score was 83.3%–88.3% and specificity ranged from 57.9%–73.3%. CONCLUSION: Digital photography may help to confirm, but not exclude, success of clubfoot treatment. Future work to establish photographic parameters as an adjunct to assessing treatment outcomes, and guidance on a standardised protocol for photographs, may be beneficial in the follow up of children who have treated clubfoot in isolated communities or lower resourced settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7228114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72281142020-06-01 Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? Smythe, Tracey Nogaro, Marie-Caroline Clifton, Laura J. Mudariki, Debra Theologis, Tim Lavy, Chris PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of photographic images of patients with clubfoot in assessing outcome following treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre diagnostic accuracy study, we included all children with clubfoot from a cohort treated between 2011 and 2013, in 2017. Two physiotherapists trained in clubfoot management calculated the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) score for each child to decide if treatment was successful or if further treatment was required. Photographic images were then taken of 79 feet. Two blinded orthopaedic surgeons assessed three sets of images of each foot (n = 237 in total) at two time points (two months apart). Treatment for each foot was rated as ‘success’, ‘borderline’ or ‘failure’. Intra- and inter-observer variation for the photographic image was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the photographic image compared to the ACT score. RESULTS: There was perfect correlation between clinical assessment and photographic evaluation of both raters at both time-points in 38 (48%) feet. The raters demonstrated acceptable reliability with re-scoring photographs (rater 1, k = 0.55; rater 2, k = 0.88). Thirty percent (n = 71) of photographs were assessed as poor quality image or sub-optimal patient position. Sensitivity of outcome with photograph compared to ACT score was 83.3%–88.3% and specificity ranged from 57.9%–73.3%. CONCLUSION: Digital photography may help to confirm, but not exclude, success of clubfoot treatment. Future work to establish photographic parameters as an adjunct to assessing treatment outcomes, and guidance on a standardised protocol for photographs, may be beneficial in the follow up of children who have treated clubfoot in isolated communities or lower resourced settings. Public Library of Science 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7228114/ /pubmed/32413066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878 Text en © 2020 Smythe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smythe, Tracey
Nogaro, Marie-Caroline
Clifton, Laura J.
Mudariki, Debra
Theologis, Tim
Lavy, Chris
Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title_full Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title_fullStr Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title_full_unstemmed Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title_short Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
title_sort remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: is it accurate?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32413066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878
work_keys_str_mv AT smythetracey remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate
AT nogaromariecaroline remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate
AT cliftonlauraj remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate
AT mudarikidebra remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate
AT theologistim remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate
AT lavychris remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate