Cargando…
Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32413066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878 |
_version_ | 1783534579816071168 |
---|---|
author | Smythe, Tracey Nogaro, Marie-Caroline Clifton, Laura J. Mudariki, Debra Theologis, Tim Lavy, Chris |
author_facet | Smythe, Tracey Nogaro, Marie-Caroline Clifton, Laura J. Mudariki, Debra Theologis, Tim Lavy, Chris |
author_sort | Smythe, Tracey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of photographic images of patients with clubfoot in assessing outcome following treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre diagnostic accuracy study, we included all children with clubfoot from a cohort treated between 2011 and 2013, in 2017. Two physiotherapists trained in clubfoot management calculated the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) score for each child to decide if treatment was successful or if further treatment was required. Photographic images were then taken of 79 feet. Two blinded orthopaedic surgeons assessed three sets of images of each foot (n = 237 in total) at two time points (two months apart). Treatment for each foot was rated as ‘success’, ‘borderline’ or ‘failure’. Intra- and inter-observer variation for the photographic image was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the photographic image compared to the ACT score. RESULTS: There was perfect correlation between clinical assessment and photographic evaluation of both raters at both time-points in 38 (48%) feet. The raters demonstrated acceptable reliability with re-scoring photographs (rater 1, k = 0.55; rater 2, k = 0.88). Thirty percent (n = 71) of photographs were assessed as poor quality image or sub-optimal patient position. Sensitivity of outcome with photograph compared to ACT score was 83.3%–88.3% and specificity ranged from 57.9%–73.3%. CONCLUSION: Digital photography may help to confirm, but not exclude, success of clubfoot treatment. Future work to establish photographic parameters as an adjunct to assessing treatment outcomes, and guidance on a standardised protocol for photographs, may be beneficial in the follow up of children who have treated clubfoot in isolated communities or lower resourced settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7228114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72281142020-06-01 Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? Smythe, Tracey Nogaro, Marie-Caroline Clifton, Laura J. Mudariki, Debra Theologis, Tim Lavy, Chris PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical examination and functional assessment are often the first steps to assess outcome of clubfoot treatment. Clinical photographs may be an adjunct used to assess treatment outcomes in lower resourced settings where physical review by a specialist is limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of photographic images of patients with clubfoot in assessing outcome following treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre diagnostic accuracy study, we included all children with clubfoot from a cohort treated between 2011 and 2013, in 2017. Two physiotherapists trained in clubfoot management calculated the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) score for each child to decide if treatment was successful or if further treatment was required. Photographic images were then taken of 79 feet. Two blinded orthopaedic surgeons assessed three sets of images of each foot (n = 237 in total) at two time points (two months apart). Treatment for each foot was rated as ‘success’, ‘borderline’ or ‘failure’. Intra- and inter-observer variation for the photographic image was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the photographic image compared to the ACT score. RESULTS: There was perfect correlation between clinical assessment and photographic evaluation of both raters at both time-points in 38 (48%) feet. The raters demonstrated acceptable reliability with re-scoring photographs (rater 1, k = 0.55; rater 2, k = 0.88). Thirty percent (n = 71) of photographs were assessed as poor quality image or sub-optimal patient position. Sensitivity of outcome with photograph compared to ACT score was 83.3%–88.3% and specificity ranged from 57.9%–73.3%. CONCLUSION: Digital photography may help to confirm, but not exclude, success of clubfoot treatment. Future work to establish photographic parameters as an adjunct to assessing treatment outcomes, and guidance on a standardised protocol for photographs, may be beneficial in the follow up of children who have treated clubfoot in isolated communities or lower resourced settings. Public Library of Science 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7228114/ /pubmed/32413066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878 Text en © 2020 Smythe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smythe, Tracey Nogaro, Marie-Caroline Clifton, Laura J. Mudariki, Debra Theologis, Tim Lavy, Chris Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title | Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title_full | Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title_fullStr | Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title_short | Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate? |
title_sort | remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: is it accurate? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32413066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smythetracey remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate AT nogaromariecaroline remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate AT cliftonlauraj remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate AT mudarikidebra remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate AT theologistim remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate AT lavychris remotemonitoringofclubfoottreatmentwithdigitalphotographsinlowresourcesettingsisitaccurate |