Cargando…

YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is this century’s largest public health emergency and its successful management relies on the effective dissemination of factual information. As a social media platform with billions of daily views, YouTube has tremendous potential to both support and hinder publi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Heidi Oi-Yee, Bailey, Adrian, Huynh, David, Chan, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604
_version_ 1783534596959240192
author Li, Heidi Oi-Yee
Bailey, Adrian
Huynh, David
Chan, James
author_facet Li, Heidi Oi-Yee
Bailey, Adrian
Huynh, David
Chan, James
author_sort Li, Heidi Oi-Yee
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is this century’s largest public health emergency and its successful management relies on the effective dissemination of factual information. As a social media platform with billions of daily views, YouTube has tremendous potential to both support and hinder public health efforts. However, the usefulness and accuracy of most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 have not been investigated. METHODS: A YouTube search was performed on 21 March 2020 using keywords ‘coronavirus’ and ‘COVID-19’, and the top 75 viewed videos from each search were analysed. Videos that were duplicates, non-English, non-audio and non-visual, exceeding 1 hour in duration, live and unrelated to COVID-19 were excluded. Two reviewers coded the source, content and characteristics of included videos. The primary outcome was usability and reliability of videos, analysed using the novel COVID-19 Specific Score (CSS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and modified JAMA (mJAMA) scores. RESULTS: Of 150 videos screened, 69 (46%) were included, totalling 257 804 146 views. Nineteen (27.5%) videos contained non-factual information, totalling 62 042 609 views. Government and professional videos contained only factual information and had higher CSS than consumer videos (mean difference (MD) 2.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 4.32, p=0.037); mDISCERN scores than consumer videos (MD 2.46, 95% CI 0.50 to 4.42, p=0.008), internet news videos (MD 2.20, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.21, p=0.027) and entertainment news videos (MD 2.57, 95% CI 0.66 to 4.49, p=0.004); and mJAMA scores than entertainment news videos (MD 1.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.36, p=0.033) and consumer videos (MD 1.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.44, p=0.028). However, they only accounted for 11% of videos and 10% of views. CONCLUSION: Over one-quarter of the most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 contained misleading information, reaching millions of viewers worldwide. As the current COVID-19 pandemic worsens, public health agencies must better use YouTube to deliver timely and accurate information and to minimise the spread of misinformation. This may play a significant role in successfully managing the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7228483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72284832020-05-18 YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? Li, Heidi Oi-Yee Bailey, Adrian Huynh, David Chan, James BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is this century’s largest public health emergency and its successful management relies on the effective dissemination of factual information. As a social media platform with billions of daily views, YouTube has tremendous potential to both support and hinder public health efforts. However, the usefulness and accuracy of most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 have not been investigated. METHODS: A YouTube search was performed on 21 March 2020 using keywords ‘coronavirus’ and ‘COVID-19’, and the top 75 viewed videos from each search were analysed. Videos that were duplicates, non-English, non-audio and non-visual, exceeding 1 hour in duration, live and unrelated to COVID-19 were excluded. Two reviewers coded the source, content and characteristics of included videos. The primary outcome was usability and reliability of videos, analysed using the novel COVID-19 Specific Score (CSS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and modified JAMA (mJAMA) scores. RESULTS: Of 150 videos screened, 69 (46%) were included, totalling 257 804 146 views. Nineteen (27.5%) videos contained non-factual information, totalling 62 042 609 views. Government and professional videos contained only factual information and had higher CSS than consumer videos (mean difference (MD) 2.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 4.32, p=0.037); mDISCERN scores than consumer videos (MD 2.46, 95% CI 0.50 to 4.42, p=0.008), internet news videos (MD 2.20, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.21, p=0.027) and entertainment news videos (MD 2.57, 95% CI 0.66 to 4.49, p=0.004); and mJAMA scores than entertainment news videos (MD 1.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.36, p=0.033) and consumer videos (MD 1.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.44, p=0.028). However, they only accounted for 11% of videos and 10% of views. CONCLUSION: Over one-quarter of the most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 contained misleading information, reaching millions of viewers worldwide. As the current COVID-19 pandemic worsens, public health agencies must better use YouTube to deliver timely and accurate information and to minimise the spread of misinformation. This may play a significant role in successfully managing the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7228483/ /pubmed/32409327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Heidi Oi-Yee
Bailey, Adrian
Huynh, David
Chan, James
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title_full YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title_fullStr YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title_full_unstemmed YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title_short YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
title_sort youtube as a source of information on covid-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604
work_keys_str_mv AT liheidioiyee youtubeasasourceofinformationoncovid19apandemicofmisinformation
AT baileyadrian youtubeasasourceofinformationoncovid19apandemicofmisinformation
AT huynhdavid youtubeasasourceofinformationoncovid19apandemicofmisinformation
AT chanjames youtubeasasourceofinformationoncovid19apandemicofmisinformation