Cargando…

Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our validation study was to assess the metrological quality of hospital data for perinatal algorithms on a national level. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: This was a multicentre study of the French medicoadministrative database on perinatal indicators. PARTICIPANTS: In each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goueslard, Karine, Cottenet, Jonathan, Benzenine, Eric, Tubert‐Bitter, Pascale, Quantin, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035218
_version_ 1783534605676052480
author Goueslard, Karine
Cottenet, Jonathan
Benzenine, Eric
Tubert‐Bitter, Pascale
Quantin, Catherine
author_facet Goueslard, Karine
Cottenet, Jonathan
Benzenine, Eric
Tubert‐Bitter, Pascale
Quantin, Catherine
author_sort Goueslard, Karine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of our validation study was to assess the metrological quality of hospital data for perinatal algorithms on a national level. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: This was a multicentre study of the French medicoadministrative database on perinatal indicators. PARTICIPANTS: In each hospital, we selected 150 discharge abstracts for delivery (after 22 weeks of gestation), in 2014, and their corresponding medical records. Overall, 22 hospitals were included. INTERVENTIONS: A single investigator performed blind data collection from medical records in order to compare data from discharge abstracts with data from medical records. Finally, 3246 discharge abstracts were studied. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Seventy items, including maternal and delivery characteristics and maternal morbidity, were collected for each delivery stay. RESULTS: The concordance rate of maternal age at delivery was 94.8% (95% CI 93.8 to 95.4). Combining the two forms of pre-existing diabetes, the algorithm presented a PPV of 65.9% and a sensitivity of 75.7%. The concordance rate of gestational age at delivery was 91.8% (90.9 to 92.7). Regarding gestational diabetes, the PPV was 80.8% (79.4 to 82.2) and the sensitivity was 79.5% (78.1 to 80.9). Regardless of the algorithm explored, the PPV for vaginal delivery was over 99%. For the diagnosis codes corresponding to immediate postpartum haemorrhage, the PPV was 77.7% (76.3 to 79.1) and the sensitivity was 75.5% (74.0 to 77.0). The algorithm for stillbirth presented a PPV of 89.4% (88.3 to 90.5) and a sensitivity of 95.4% (94.7 to 96.1). CONCLUSIONS: This first national validation study of many perinatal algorithms suggests that the French national hospital database is an appropriate data source for epidemiological studies, except for some indicators which presented low PPV and/or sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7228531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72285312020-05-18 Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms Goueslard, Karine Cottenet, Jonathan Benzenine, Eric Tubert‐Bitter, Pascale Quantin, Catherine BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: The aim of our validation study was to assess the metrological quality of hospital data for perinatal algorithms on a national level. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: This was a multicentre study of the French medicoadministrative database on perinatal indicators. PARTICIPANTS: In each hospital, we selected 150 discharge abstracts for delivery (after 22 weeks of gestation), in 2014, and their corresponding medical records. Overall, 22 hospitals were included. INTERVENTIONS: A single investigator performed blind data collection from medical records in order to compare data from discharge abstracts with data from medical records. Finally, 3246 discharge abstracts were studied. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Seventy items, including maternal and delivery characteristics and maternal morbidity, were collected for each delivery stay. RESULTS: The concordance rate of maternal age at delivery was 94.8% (95% CI 93.8 to 95.4). Combining the two forms of pre-existing diabetes, the algorithm presented a PPV of 65.9% and a sensitivity of 75.7%. The concordance rate of gestational age at delivery was 91.8% (90.9 to 92.7). Regarding gestational diabetes, the PPV was 80.8% (79.4 to 82.2) and the sensitivity was 79.5% (78.1 to 80.9). Regardless of the algorithm explored, the PPV for vaginal delivery was over 99%. For the diagnosis codes corresponding to immediate postpartum haemorrhage, the PPV was 77.7% (76.3 to 79.1) and the sensitivity was 75.5% (74.0 to 77.0). The algorithm for stillbirth presented a PPV of 89.4% (88.3 to 90.5) and a sensitivity of 95.4% (94.7 to 96.1). CONCLUSIONS: This first national validation study of many perinatal algorithms suggests that the French national hospital database is an appropriate data source for epidemiological studies, except for some indicators which presented low PPV and/or sensitivity. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7228531/ /pubmed/32404391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035218 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Goueslard, Karine
Cottenet, Jonathan
Benzenine, Eric
Tubert‐Bitter, Pascale
Quantin, Catherine
Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title_full Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title_fullStr Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title_short Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms
title_sort validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of french hospital data for perinatal algorithms
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035218
work_keys_str_mv AT goueslardkarine validationstudyevaluationofthemetrologicalqualityoffrenchhospitaldataforperinatalalgorithms
AT cottenetjonathan validationstudyevaluationofthemetrologicalqualityoffrenchhospitaldataforperinatalalgorithms
AT benzenineeric validationstudyevaluationofthemetrologicalqualityoffrenchhospitaldataforperinatalalgorithms
AT tubertbitterpascale validationstudyevaluationofthemetrologicalqualityoffrenchhospitaldataforperinatalalgorithms
AT quantincatherine validationstudyevaluationofthemetrologicalqualityoffrenchhospitaldataforperinatalalgorithms