Cargando…

Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models

Kangsabati basin located in tropical plateau region faces multiple problems of soil erosion susceptibility (SES), soil fertility deterioration, and sedimentation in reservoirs. Hence, identification of SES zones in thirty-eight sub-basins (SB) for basin prioritization is necessary. The present resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar, Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das, Das, Kousik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474
_version_ 1783534649950076928
author Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das
Das, Kousik
author_facet Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das
Das, Kousik
author_sort Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
collection PubMed
description Kangsabati basin located in tropical plateau region faces multiple problems of soil erosion susceptibility (SES), soil fertility deterioration, and sedimentation in reservoirs. Hence, identification of SES zones in thirty-eight sub-basins (SB) for basin prioritization is necessary. The present research addressed the issue by using four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models: VlseKriterijumska optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), simple additive weighing (SAW), compound factor (CF). To determine the best fitted method from MCDM for erosion susceptibility (ES), a comparison has been made with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), where fifteen morphometric parameters were considered for MCDM, and meteorological data, soil, slope and land use land cover (LULC) were considered for SWAT model. Two validation indices of percentage change and intensity change were used for evaluation and comparison of MCDM results. With SWAT model performance, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs (CUP) was used for sensitive analysis of SWAT parameters on flow discharge and sediment load simulation. The results showed that 23, 16, 18 SB have high ES; therefore they were given 1 to 3 ranks, whereas 31, 37, 21SB have low ES, hence given 38 to 36 rank as predicted by MCDM methods and SWAT. MCDM validation results depict that VIKOR and CF methods are more acceptable than TOPSIS and SAW. Calibration (flow discharge R(2) 0.86, NSE 0.75; sediment load R(2) 0.87, NSE 0.69) and validation (flow discharge R(2) 0.79, NSE 0.55; sediment load R(2) 0.79, NSE 0.76) of SWAT model indicated that simulated results are well fitted with observed data. Therefore, VIKOR reflects the significant role of morphometric parameters on ES, whereas SWAT reflects the significant role of LULC, slope, and soil on ES. However, it could be concluded that VIKOR is more effective MCDM method in comparison to SWAT prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7228880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72288802020-05-18 Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das Das, Kousik Sci Total Environ Article Kangsabati basin located in tropical plateau region faces multiple problems of soil erosion susceptibility (SES), soil fertility deterioration, and sedimentation in reservoirs. Hence, identification of SES zones in thirty-eight sub-basins (SB) for basin prioritization is necessary. The present research addressed the issue by using four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models: VlseKriterijumska optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), simple additive weighing (SAW), compound factor (CF). To determine the best fitted method from MCDM for erosion susceptibility (ES), a comparison has been made with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), where fifteen morphometric parameters were considered for MCDM, and meteorological data, soil, slope and land use land cover (LULC) were considered for SWAT model. Two validation indices of percentage change and intensity change were used for evaluation and comparison of MCDM results. With SWAT model performance, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs (CUP) was used for sensitive analysis of SWAT parameters on flow discharge and sediment load simulation. The results showed that 23, 16, 18 SB have high ES; therefore they were given 1 to 3 ranks, whereas 31, 37, 21SB have low ES, hence given 38 to 36 rank as predicted by MCDM methods and SWAT. MCDM validation results depict that VIKOR and CF methods are more acceptable than TOPSIS and SAW. Calibration (flow discharge R(2) 0.86, NSE 0.75; sediment load R(2) 0.87, NSE 0.69) and validation (flow discharge R(2) 0.79, NSE 0.55; sediment load R(2) 0.79, NSE 0.76) of SWAT model indicated that simulated results are well fitted with observed data. Therefore, VIKOR reflects the significant role of morphometric parameters on ES, whereas SWAT reflects the significant role of LULC, slope, and soil on ES. However, it could be concluded that VIKOR is more effective MCDM method in comparison to SWAT prediction. Elsevier B.V. 2020-09-10 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7228880/ /pubmed/32425254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das
Das, Kousik
Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title_full Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title_fullStr Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title_full_unstemmed Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title_short Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
title_sort sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in kangsabati, a plateau basin: a comparison between mcdm and swat models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyarajkumar subbasinprioritizationforassessmentofsoilerosionsusceptibilityinkangsabatiaplateaubasinacomparisonbetweenmcdmandswatmodels
AT chatterjeenilanjanadas subbasinprioritizationforassessmentofsoilerosionsusceptibilityinkangsabatiaplateaubasinacomparisonbetweenmcdmandswatmodels
AT daskousik subbasinprioritizationforassessmentofsoilerosionsusceptibilityinkangsabatiaplateaubasinacomparisonbetweenmcdmandswatmodels