Cargando…
Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue
This study draws on data on sales volume, brand-level market shares, and sugar content to calculate the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales volume by sugar content, propose sugar content thresholds for a tiered tax structure, and estimate tax revenue. The most common SSBs sold had 2...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x |
_version_ | 1783534674115559424 |
---|---|
author | Powell, Lisa M. Andreyeva, Tatiana Isgor, Zeynep |
author_facet | Powell, Lisa M. Andreyeva, Tatiana Isgor, Zeynep |
author_sort | Powell, Lisa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study draws on data on sales volume, brand-level market shares, and sugar content to calculate the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales volume by sugar content, propose sugar content thresholds for a tiered tax structure, and estimate tax revenue. The most common SSBs sold had 26 g of sugar/8-oz serving; 70.8% had ≥ 25 g of sugar/8-oz serving, 16.9% were in the 10–15 g range, and 8.7% were in the 16–20 g range. A tiered tax with cut points at < 20 g and < 5 g of sugar/8-oz serving is proposed. A tax of 1¢/oz for SSBs in the second tier and 2¢/oz in third tier is projected to raise $18.2 billion in tax revenue similar to the 1.5¢/oz flat tax projection ($18.0 billion) but would yield 9% lower SSB volume. Understanding the distribution of SSB sales volume by sugar content informs policymakers on tiered tax structures, which may discourage consumption of SSBs with high levels of sugar and incentivize reformulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7228983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72289832020-05-18 Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue Powell, Lisa M. Andreyeva, Tatiana Isgor, Zeynep J Public Health Policy Original Article This study draws on data on sales volume, brand-level market shares, and sugar content to calculate the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales volume by sugar content, propose sugar content thresholds for a tiered tax structure, and estimate tax revenue. The most common SSBs sold had 26 g of sugar/8-oz serving; 70.8% had ≥ 25 g of sugar/8-oz serving, 16.9% were in the 10–15 g range, and 8.7% were in the 16–20 g range. A tiered tax with cut points at < 20 g and < 5 g of sugar/8-oz serving is proposed. A tax of 1¢/oz for SSBs in the second tier and 2¢/oz in third tier is projected to raise $18.2 billion in tax revenue similar to the 1.5¢/oz flat tax projection ($18.0 billion) but would yield 9% lower SSB volume. Understanding the distribution of SSB sales volume by sugar content informs policymakers on tiered tax structures, which may discourage consumption of SSBs with high levels of sugar and incentivize reformulation. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2020-01-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7228983/ /pubmed/31969656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Powell, Lisa M. Andreyeva, Tatiana Isgor, Zeynep Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title | Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title_full | Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title_fullStr | Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title_short | Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
title_sort | distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the united states: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powelllisam distributionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesalesvolumebysugarcontentintheunitedstatesimplicationsfortieredtaxationandtaxrevenue AT andreyevatatiana distributionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesalesvolumebysugarcontentintheunitedstatesimplicationsfortieredtaxationandtaxrevenue AT isgorzeynep distributionofsugarsweetenedbeveragesalesvolumebysugarcontentintheunitedstatesimplicationsfortieredtaxationandtaxrevenue |