Cargando…

A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises

Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quigley, Mark C., Attanayake, Januka, King, Andrew, Prideaux, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7229439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1
_version_ 1783534762850254848
author Quigley, Mark C.
Attanayake, Januka
King, Andrew
Prideaux, Fabian
author_facet Quigley, Mark C.
Attanayake, Januka
King, Andrew
Prideaux, Fabian
author_sort Quigley, Mark C.
collection PubMed
description Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curves enables delineation of multi-hazard scenarios for selected countries (United States, China, Australia, Bangladesh) and regions (Texas). In multi-hazard crises, governments and other responding agents may be required to make complex, highly compromised, hierarchical decisions aimed to balance COVID-19 risks and protocols with disaster response and recovery operations. Contemporary socioeconomic changes (e.g. reducing risk mitigation measures, lowering restrictions on human activity to stimulate economic recovery) may alter COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics and increase future risks relating to natural hazards and COVID-19 interactions. For example, the aggregation of evacuees into communal environments and increased demand on medical, economic, and infrastructural capacity associated with natural hazard impacts may increase COVID-19 exposure risks and vulnerabilities. COVID-19 epidemiologic conditions at the time of a natural hazard event might also influence the characteristics of emergency and humanitarian responses (e.g. evacuation and sheltering procedures, resource availability, implementation modalities, and assistance types). A simple epidemic phenomenological model with a concurrent disaster event predicts a greater infection rate following events during the pre-infection rate peak period compared with post-peak events, highlighting the need for enacting COVID-19 counter measures in advance of seasonal increases in natural hazards. Inclusion of natural hazard inputs into COVID-19 epidemiological models could enhance the evidence base for informing contemporary policy across diverse multi-hazard scenarios, defining and addressing gaps in disaster preparedness strategies and resourcing, and implementing a future-planning systems approach into contemporary COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Our recommendations may assist governments and their advisors to develop risk reduction strategies for natural and cascading hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7229439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72294392020-05-18 A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises Quigley, Mark C. Attanayake, Januka King, Andrew Prideaux, Fabian Environ Syst Decis Article Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curves enables delineation of multi-hazard scenarios for selected countries (United States, China, Australia, Bangladesh) and regions (Texas). In multi-hazard crises, governments and other responding agents may be required to make complex, highly compromised, hierarchical decisions aimed to balance COVID-19 risks and protocols with disaster response and recovery operations. Contemporary socioeconomic changes (e.g. reducing risk mitigation measures, lowering restrictions on human activity to stimulate economic recovery) may alter COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics and increase future risks relating to natural hazards and COVID-19 interactions. For example, the aggregation of evacuees into communal environments and increased demand on medical, economic, and infrastructural capacity associated with natural hazard impacts may increase COVID-19 exposure risks and vulnerabilities. COVID-19 epidemiologic conditions at the time of a natural hazard event might also influence the characteristics of emergency and humanitarian responses (e.g. evacuation and sheltering procedures, resource availability, implementation modalities, and assistance types). A simple epidemic phenomenological model with a concurrent disaster event predicts a greater infection rate following events during the pre-infection rate peak period compared with post-peak events, highlighting the need for enacting COVID-19 counter measures in advance of seasonal increases in natural hazards. Inclusion of natural hazard inputs into COVID-19 epidemiological models could enhance the evidence base for informing contemporary policy across diverse multi-hazard scenarios, defining and addressing gaps in disaster preparedness strategies and resourcing, and implementing a future-planning systems approach into contemporary COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Our recommendations may assist governments and their advisors to develop risk reduction strategies for natural and cascading hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7229439/ /pubmed/32427170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Quigley, Mark C.
Attanayake, Januka
King, Andrew
Prideaux, Fabian
A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title_full A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title_fullStr A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title_full_unstemmed A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title_short A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
title_sort multi-hazards earth science perspective on the covid-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7229439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1
work_keys_str_mv AT quigleymarkc amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT attanayakejanuka amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT kingandrew amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT prideauxfabian amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT quigleymarkc multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT attanayakejanuka multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT kingandrew multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises
AT prideauxfabian multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises