Cargando…
A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises
Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7229439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1 |
_version_ | 1783534762850254848 |
---|---|
author | Quigley, Mark C. Attanayake, Januka King, Andrew Prideaux, Fabian |
author_facet | Quigley, Mark C. Attanayake, Januka King, Andrew Prideaux, Fabian |
author_sort | Quigley, Mark C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curves enables delineation of multi-hazard scenarios for selected countries (United States, China, Australia, Bangladesh) and regions (Texas). In multi-hazard crises, governments and other responding agents may be required to make complex, highly compromised, hierarchical decisions aimed to balance COVID-19 risks and protocols with disaster response and recovery operations. Contemporary socioeconomic changes (e.g. reducing risk mitigation measures, lowering restrictions on human activity to stimulate economic recovery) may alter COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics and increase future risks relating to natural hazards and COVID-19 interactions. For example, the aggregation of evacuees into communal environments and increased demand on medical, economic, and infrastructural capacity associated with natural hazard impacts may increase COVID-19 exposure risks and vulnerabilities. COVID-19 epidemiologic conditions at the time of a natural hazard event might also influence the characteristics of emergency and humanitarian responses (e.g. evacuation and sheltering procedures, resource availability, implementation modalities, and assistance types). A simple epidemic phenomenological model with a concurrent disaster event predicts a greater infection rate following events during the pre-infection rate peak period compared with post-peak events, highlighting the need for enacting COVID-19 counter measures in advance of seasonal increases in natural hazards. Inclusion of natural hazard inputs into COVID-19 epidemiological models could enhance the evidence base for informing contemporary policy across diverse multi-hazard scenarios, defining and addressing gaps in disaster preparedness strategies and resourcing, and implementing a future-planning systems approach into contemporary COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Our recommendations may assist governments and their advisors to develop risk reduction strategies for natural and cascading hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7229439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72294392020-05-18 A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises Quigley, Mark C. Attanayake, Januka King, Andrew Prideaux, Fabian Environ Syst Decis Article Meteorological and geophysical hazards will concur and interact with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impacts in many regions on Earth. These interactions will challenge the resilience of societies and systems. A comparison of plausible COVID-19 epidemic trajectories with multi-hazard time-series curves enables delineation of multi-hazard scenarios for selected countries (United States, China, Australia, Bangladesh) and regions (Texas). In multi-hazard crises, governments and other responding agents may be required to make complex, highly compromised, hierarchical decisions aimed to balance COVID-19 risks and protocols with disaster response and recovery operations. Contemporary socioeconomic changes (e.g. reducing risk mitigation measures, lowering restrictions on human activity to stimulate economic recovery) may alter COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics and increase future risks relating to natural hazards and COVID-19 interactions. For example, the aggregation of evacuees into communal environments and increased demand on medical, economic, and infrastructural capacity associated with natural hazard impacts may increase COVID-19 exposure risks and vulnerabilities. COVID-19 epidemiologic conditions at the time of a natural hazard event might also influence the characteristics of emergency and humanitarian responses (e.g. evacuation and sheltering procedures, resource availability, implementation modalities, and assistance types). A simple epidemic phenomenological model with a concurrent disaster event predicts a greater infection rate following events during the pre-infection rate peak period compared with post-peak events, highlighting the need for enacting COVID-19 counter measures in advance of seasonal increases in natural hazards. Inclusion of natural hazard inputs into COVID-19 epidemiological models could enhance the evidence base for informing contemporary policy across diverse multi-hazard scenarios, defining and addressing gaps in disaster preparedness strategies and resourcing, and implementing a future-planning systems approach into contemporary COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Our recommendations may assist governments and their advisors to develop risk reduction strategies for natural and cascading hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7229439/ /pubmed/32427170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Quigley, Mark C. Attanayake, Januka King, Andrew Prideaux, Fabian A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title | A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title_full | A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title_fullStr | A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title_short | A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
title_sort | multi-hazards earth science perspective on the covid-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7229439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quigleymarkc amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT attanayakejanuka amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT kingandrew amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT prideauxfabian amultihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT quigleymarkc multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT attanayakejanuka multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT kingandrew multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises AT prideauxfabian multihazardsearthscienceperspectiveonthecovid19pandemicthepotentialforconcurrentandcascadingcrises |