Cargando…
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
BACKGROUND: Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions. Little research has examined the quality of panel discussions and how effectively they are facilitated. MET...
Autores principales: | Gallo, Stephen A., Schmaling, Karen B., Thompson, Lisa A., Glisson, Scott R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7229595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Schmaling, Karen B., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Peer review: Risk and risk tolerance
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)