Cargando…

A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution

PURPOSE: Free flaps have become the standard option in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Even though many authors have outlined the reliability of free transplants, there is an ongoing discussion about treatment options for patients bearing particular risks as previous irradiation treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spoerl, Steffen, Schoedel, Shlomo, Spanier, Gerrit, Mueller, Karolina, Meier, Johannes K., Reichert, Torsten E., Ettl, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00838-7
_version_ 1783534868775305216
author Spoerl, Steffen
Schoedel, Shlomo
Spanier, Gerrit
Mueller, Karolina
Meier, Johannes K.
Reichert, Torsten E.
Ettl, Tobias
author_facet Spoerl, Steffen
Schoedel, Shlomo
Spanier, Gerrit
Mueller, Karolina
Meier, Johannes K.
Reichert, Torsten E.
Ettl, Tobias
author_sort Spoerl, Steffen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Free flaps have become the standard option in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Even though many authors have outlined the reliability of free transplants, there is an ongoing discussion about treatment options for patients bearing particular risks as previous irradiation treatment. In this analysis, we aim to address these patients with particular risk profiles by comparing different flap entity outcome parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 494 patients who underwent flap surgery between 2009 and 2018 in our department. Focusing on free microvascular transplants, we additionally analyzed the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap as the most frequently used vascular pedicled flap. Data analysis was performed by uni- and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: Overall flap success rate was 90%, with the radial forearm flap occurring to be most reliable (93%) in head and neck reconstruction. Previous radiation therapy (RT) and intraoperative revision of vascular anastomosis during primary surgery significantly resulted in impaired transplant outcome with a success rate of 91.8% (no RT) vs. 83.7% (RT), respectively. There was a negative linear correlation between incision to suture time and number of flaps per year (R(2) = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiation therapy and intraoperative revision of anastomosis significantly impair outcome of microvascular flaps in the head and neck and oral cavity, whereas patient’s age is not a predictor of flap failure. Increasing case number and experience reduces time of flap surgery as well as rate of complications and flap failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7230044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72300442020-05-18 A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution Spoerl, Steffen Schoedel, Shlomo Spanier, Gerrit Mueller, Karolina Meier, Johannes K. Reichert, Torsten E. Ettl, Tobias Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Free flaps have become the standard option in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Even though many authors have outlined the reliability of free transplants, there is an ongoing discussion about treatment options for patients bearing particular risks as previous irradiation treatment. In this analysis, we aim to address these patients with particular risk profiles by comparing different flap entity outcome parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 494 patients who underwent flap surgery between 2009 and 2018 in our department. Focusing on free microvascular transplants, we additionally analyzed the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap as the most frequently used vascular pedicled flap. Data analysis was performed by uni- and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: Overall flap success rate was 90%, with the radial forearm flap occurring to be most reliable (93%) in head and neck reconstruction. Previous radiation therapy (RT) and intraoperative revision of vascular anastomosis during primary surgery significantly resulted in impaired transplant outcome with a success rate of 91.8% (no RT) vs. 83.7% (RT), respectively. There was a negative linear correlation between incision to suture time and number of flaps per year (R(2) = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiation therapy and intraoperative revision of anastomosis significantly impair outcome of microvascular flaps in the head and neck and oral cavity, whereas patient’s age is not a predictor of flap failure. Increasing case number and experience reduces time of flap surgery as well as rate of complications and flap failure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7230044/ /pubmed/32198652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00838-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Spoerl, Steffen
Schoedel, Shlomo
Spanier, Gerrit
Mueller, Karolina
Meier, Johannes K.
Reichert, Torsten E.
Ettl, Tobias
A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title_full A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title_fullStr A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title_full_unstemmed A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title_short A decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. Experience of a single center institution
title_sort decade of reconstructive surgery: outcome and perspectives of free tissue transfer in the head and neck. experience of a single center institution
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00838-7
work_keys_str_mv AT spoerlsteffen adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT schoedelshlomo adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT spaniergerrit adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT muellerkarolina adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT meierjohannesk adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT reicherttorstene adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT ettltobias adecadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT spoerlsteffen decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT schoedelshlomo decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT spaniergerrit decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT muellerkarolina decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT meierjohannesk decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT reicherttorstene decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution
AT ettltobias decadeofreconstructivesurgeryoutcomeandperspectivesoffreetissuetransferintheheadandneckexperienceofasinglecenterinstitution