Cargando…
Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration para...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6 |
_version_ | 1783534871866507264 |
---|---|
author | Nousiainen, Katri Mäkelä, Teemu |
author_facet | Nousiainen, Katri Mäkelä, Teemu |
author_sort | Nousiainen, Katri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. RESULTS: With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors’ distortion correction on or off, respectively. DISCUSSION: Using nonrigid CT–MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra- and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7230057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72300572020-05-18 Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration Nousiainen, Katri Mäkelä, Teemu MAGMA Research Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. RESULTS: With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors’ distortion correction on or off, respectively. DISCUSSION: Using nonrigid CT–MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra- and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions. Springer International Publishing 2019-10-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7230057/ /pubmed/31646408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nousiainen, Katri Mäkelä, Teemu Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title | Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title_full | Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title_fullStr | Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title_short | Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
title_sort | measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3d-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nousiainenkatri measuringgeometricaccuracyinmagneticresonanceimagingwith3dprintedphantomandnonrigidimageregistration AT makelateemu measuringgeometricaccuracyinmagneticresonanceimagingwith3dprintedphantomandnonrigidimageregistration |