Cargando…

Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration para...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nousiainen, Katri, Mäkelä, Teemu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6
_version_ 1783534871866507264
author Nousiainen, Katri
Mäkelä, Teemu
author_facet Nousiainen, Katri
Mäkelä, Teemu
author_sort Nousiainen, Katri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. RESULTS: With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors’ distortion correction on or off, respectively. DISCUSSION: Using nonrigid CT–MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra- and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7230057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72300572020-05-18 Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration Nousiainen, Katri Mäkelä, Teemu MAGMA Research Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. RESULTS: With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors’ distortion correction on or off, respectively. DISCUSSION: Using nonrigid CT–MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra- and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions. Springer International Publishing 2019-10-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7230057/ /pubmed/31646408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nousiainen, Katri
Mäkelä, Teemu
Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title_full Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title_fullStr Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title_full_unstemmed Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title_short Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
title_sort measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3d-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00788-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nousiainenkatri measuringgeometricaccuracyinmagneticresonanceimagingwith3dprintedphantomandnonrigidimageregistration
AT makelateemu measuringgeometricaccuracyinmagneticresonanceimagingwith3dprintedphantomandnonrigidimageregistration