Cargando…
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation
Placing a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in an appropriate position to facilitate lung isolation is essential for thoracic procedures. The novel ANKOR DLT is a DLT developed with three cuffs with a newly added carinal cuff designed to prevent further advancement by being blocked by the carina...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040977 |
_version_ | 1783534894082686976 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Namo Byon, Hyo-Jin Kim, Go Eun Park, Chungon Joe, Young Eun Suh, Sung Min Oh, Young Jun |
author_facet | Kim, Namo Byon, Hyo-Jin Kim, Go Eun Park, Chungon Joe, Young Eun Suh, Sung Min Oh, Young Jun |
author_sort | Kim, Namo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Placing a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in an appropriate position to facilitate lung isolation is essential for thoracic procedures. The novel ANKOR DLT is a DLT developed with three cuffs with a newly added carinal cuff designed to prevent further advancement by being blocked by the carina when the cuff is inflated. In this prospective study, the direction and depth of initial placement of ANKOR DLT were compared with those of conventional DLT. Patients undergoing thoracic surgery (n = 190) with one-lung ventilation (OLV) were randomly allocated into either left-sided conventional DLT group (n = 95) or left-sided ANKOR DLT group (n = 95). The direction and depth of DLT position were compared via fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) after endobronchial intubation between the groups. There was no significant difference in the number of right mainstem endobronchial intubations between the two groups (p = 0.468). The difference between the initial depth of DLT placement and the target depth confirmed by FOB was significantly lower in the ANKOR DLT group than in the conventional DLT group (1.8 ± 1.8 vs. 12.9 ± 9.7 mm; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the ANKOR DLT facilitated its initial positioning at the optimal depth compared to the conventional DLT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7230200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72302002020-05-28 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation Kim, Namo Byon, Hyo-Jin Kim, Go Eun Park, Chungon Joe, Young Eun Suh, Sung Min Oh, Young Jun J Clin Med Article Placing a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in an appropriate position to facilitate lung isolation is essential for thoracic procedures. The novel ANKOR DLT is a DLT developed with three cuffs with a newly added carinal cuff designed to prevent further advancement by being blocked by the carina when the cuff is inflated. In this prospective study, the direction and depth of initial placement of ANKOR DLT were compared with those of conventional DLT. Patients undergoing thoracic surgery (n = 190) with one-lung ventilation (OLV) were randomly allocated into either left-sided conventional DLT group (n = 95) or left-sided ANKOR DLT group (n = 95). The direction and depth of DLT position were compared via fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) after endobronchial intubation between the groups. There was no significant difference in the number of right mainstem endobronchial intubations between the two groups (p = 0.468). The difference between the initial depth of DLT placement and the target depth confirmed by FOB was significantly lower in the ANKOR DLT group than in the conventional DLT group (1.8 ± 1.8 vs. 12.9 ± 9.7 mm; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the ANKOR DLT facilitated its initial positioning at the optimal depth compared to the conventional DLT. MDPI 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7230200/ /pubmed/32244659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040977 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Namo Byon, Hyo-Jin Kim, Go Eun Park, Chungon Joe, Young Eun Suh, Sung Min Oh, Young Jun A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title_full | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title_short | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial comparing novel triple-cuffed double-lumen endobronchial tubes with conventional double-lumen endobronchial tubes for lung isolation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimnamo arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT byonhyojin arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT kimgoeun arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT parkchungon arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT joeyoungeun arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT suhsungmin arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT ohyoungjun arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT kimnamo randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT byonhyojin randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT kimgoeun randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT parkchungon randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT joeyoungeun randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT suhsungmin randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation AT ohyoungjun randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnoveltriplecuffeddoublelumenendobronchialtubeswithconventionaldoublelumenendobronchialtubesforlungisolation |