Cargando…
The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495 |
_version_ | 1783534984723693568 |
---|---|
author | Conte-Junior, Carlos A. Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G. Patrícia, Renata Mársico, Eliane T. Lopes, Márcia M. Alvares, Thiago S. Mano, Sérgio B. |
author_facet | Conte-Junior, Carlos A. Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G. Patrícia, Renata Mársico, Eliane T. Lopes, Márcia M. Alvares, Thiago S. Mano, Sérgio B. |
author_sort | Conte-Junior, Carlos A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2) (70% O(2) and 30% CO(2)), 60O(2):40CO(2) (60% O(2) and 40% CO(2)), 50O(2):50CO(2) (50% O(2) and 50% CO(2)), 100O(2) (100% O(2)), and VP (vacuum packaging). All treatments were analyzed daily for O(2) and CO(2) levels, pH, filtration time, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria (AMHB), and aerobic psychrotrophic heterotrophic bacteria (APHB) over 20 days at 2 °C. All MAP systems had a decrease of O(2) and an increase of CO(2) levels during storage period (p < 0.05). Overall, the MAP systems were similarly able to decrease the pH and retard the increase of TVB-N and filtration time over the storage period (p > 0.05). Moreover, the MAP systems increased the lag phase and/or the generation time of both AMHB and APHB, extending the shelf life by 3 (90O(2):10CO(2)), 4 (70O(2):30CO(2) and 100O(2)), and 5 days (80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP). All MAP systems were equally effective in retarding physicochemical degradation; however, 80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP were the most effective in impairing bacterial growth and extending the shelf life of ground beef stored under refrigeration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7230568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72305682020-05-22 The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef Conte-Junior, Carlos A. Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G. Patrícia, Renata Mársico, Eliane T. Lopes, Márcia M. Alvares, Thiago S. Mano, Sérgio B. Foods Article The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2) (70% O(2) and 30% CO(2)), 60O(2):40CO(2) (60% O(2) and 40% CO(2)), 50O(2):50CO(2) (50% O(2) and 50% CO(2)), 100O(2) (100% O(2)), and VP (vacuum packaging). All treatments were analyzed daily for O(2) and CO(2) levels, pH, filtration time, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria (AMHB), and aerobic psychrotrophic heterotrophic bacteria (APHB) over 20 days at 2 °C. All MAP systems had a decrease of O(2) and an increase of CO(2) levels during storage period (p < 0.05). Overall, the MAP systems were similarly able to decrease the pH and retard the increase of TVB-N and filtration time over the storage period (p > 0.05). Moreover, the MAP systems increased the lag phase and/or the generation time of both AMHB and APHB, extending the shelf life by 3 (90O(2):10CO(2)), 4 (70O(2):30CO(2) and 100O(2)), and 5 days (80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP). All MAP systems were equally effective in retarding physicochemical degradation; however, 80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP were the most effective in impairing bacterial growth and extending the shelf life of ground beef stored under refrigeration. MDPI 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7230568/ /pubmed/32295229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Conte-Junior, Carlos A. Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G. Patrícia, Renata Mársico, Eliane T. Lopes, Márcia M. Alvares, Thiago S. Mano, Sérgio B. The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title | The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title_full | The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title_short | The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef |
title_sort | effect of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT contejuniorcarlosa theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT monteiromarialuciag theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT patriciarenata theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT marsicoelianet theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT lopesmarciam theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT alvaresthiagos theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT manosergiob theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT contejuniorcarlosa effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT monteiromarialuciag effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT patriciarenata effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT marsicoelianet effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT lopesmarciam effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT alvaresthiagos effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef AT manosergiob effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef |