Cargando…

The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conte-Junior, Carlos A., Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G., Patrícia, Renata, Mársico, Eliane T., Lopes, Márcia M., Alvares, Thiago S., Mano, Sérgio B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295229
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495
_version_ 1783534984723693568
author Conte-Junior, Carlos A.
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G.
Patrícia, Renata
Mársico, Eliane T.
Lopes, Márcia M.
Alvares, Thiago S.
Mano, Sérgio B.
author_facet Conte-Junior, Carlos A.
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G.
Patrícia, Renata
Mársico, Eliane T.
Lopes, Márcia M.
Alvares, Thiago S.
Mano, Sérgio B.
author_sort Conte-Junior, Carlos A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2) (70% O(2) and 30% CO(2)), 60O(2):40CO(2) (60% O(2) and 40% CO(2)), 50O(2):50CO(2) (50% O(2) and 50% CO(2)), 100O(2) (100% O(2)), and VP (vacuum packaging). All treatments were analyzed daily for O(2) and CO(2) levels, pH, filtration time, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria (AMHB), and aerobic psychrotrophic heterotrophic bacteria (APHB) over 20 days at 2 °C. All MAP systems had a decrease of O(2) and an increase of CO(2) levels during storage period (p < 0.05). Overall, the MAP systems were similarly able to decrease the pH and retard the increase of TVB-N and filtration time over the storage period (p > 0.05). Moreover, the MAP systems increased the lag phase and/or the generation time of both AMHB and APHB, extending the shelf life by 3 (90O(2):10CO(2)), 4 (70O(2):30CO(2) and 100O(2)), and 5 days (80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP). All MAP systems were equally effective in retarding physicochemical degradation; however, 80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP were the most effective in impairing bacterial growth and extending the shelf life of ground beef stored under refrigeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7230568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72305682020-05-22 The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef Conte-Junior, Carlos A. Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G. Patrícia, Renata Mársico, Eliane T. Lopes, Márcia M. Alvares, Thiago S. Mano, Sérgio B. Foods Article The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef. The ground beef samples were packaged as follows: AA (100% ambient air), 90O(2):10CO(2) (90% O(2) and 10% CO(2)), 80O(2):20CO(2) (80% O(2) and 20% CO(2)), 70O(2):30CO(2) (70% O(2) and 30% CO(2)), 60O(2):40CO(2) (60% O(2) and 40% CO(2)), 50O(2):50CO(2) (50% O(2) and 50% CO(2)), 100O(2) (100% O(2)), and VP (vacuum packaging). All treatments were analyzed daily for O(2) and CO(2) levels, pH, filtration time, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria (AMHB), and aerobic psychrotrophic heterotrophic bacteria (APHB) over 20 days at 2 °C. All MAP systems had a decrease of O(2) and an increase of CO(2) levels during storage period (p < 0.05). Overall, the MAP systems were similarly able to decrease the pH and retard the increase of TVB-N and filtration time over the storage period (p > 0.05). Moreover, the MAP systems increased the lag phase and/or the generation time of both AMHB and APHB, extending the shelf life by 3 (90O(2):10CO(2)), 4 (70O(2):30CO(2) and 100O(2)), and 5 days (80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP). All MAP systems were equally effective in retarding physicochemical degradation; however, 80O(2):20CO(2), 60O(2):40CO(2), 50O(2):50CO(2,) and VP were the most effective in impairing bacterial growth and extending the shelf life of ground beef stored under refrigeration. MDPI 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7230568/ /pubmed/32295229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Conte-Junior, Carlos A.
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia G.
Patrícia, Renata
Mársico, Eliane T.
Lopes, Márcia M.
Alvares, Thiago S.
Mano, Sérgio B.
The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title_full The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title_short The Effect of Different Packaging Systems on the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Ground Beef
title_sort effect of different packaging systems on the shelf life of refrigerated ground beef
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295229
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040495
work_keys_str_mv AT contejuniorcarlosa theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT monteiromarialuciag theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT patriciarenata theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT marsicoelianet theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT lopesmarciam theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT alvaresthiagos theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT manosergiob theeffectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT contejuniorcarlosa effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT monteiromarialuciag effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT patriciarenata effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT marsicoelianet effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT lopesmarciam effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT alvaresthiagos effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef
AT manosergiob effectofdifferentpackagingsystemsontheshelflifeofrefrigeratedgroundbeef