Cargando…
Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees
This study presents the results of conventional aqueous (CE) and non-conventional ultrasound-assisted (UAE) extractions of polyphenolic compounds from lees extracts of red wine varieties (Merlot and Vranac). The effect of ultrasound extraction time (t, s), and amplitude (A,%) from a 400 W ultrasound...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040472 |
_version_ | 1783535087586902016 |
---|---|
author | Dujmić, Filip Kovačević Ganić, Karin Ćurić, Duska Karlović, Sven Bosiljkov, Tomislav Ježek, Damir Vidrih, Rajko Hribar, Janez Zlatić, Emil Prusina, Tihomir Khubber, Sucheta Barba, Francisco J. Brnčić, Mladen |
author_facet | Dujmić, Filip Kovačević Ganić, Karin Ćurić, Duska Karlović, Sven Bosiljkov, Tomislav Ježek, Damir Vidrih, Rajko Hribar, Janez Zlatić, Emil Prusina, Tihomir Khubber, Sucheta Barba, Francisco J. Brnčić, Mladen |
author_sort | Dujmić, Filip |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study presents the results of conventional aqueous (CE) and non-conventional ultrasound-assisted (UAE) extractions of polyphenolic compounds from lees extracts of red wine varieties (Merlot and Vranac). The effect of ultrasound extraction time (t, s), and amplitude (A,%) from a 400 W ultrasound processor with different ultrasonic probes diameters (Ds, mm) on the amount and profile of polyphenolic compounds in the obtained extracts was investigated and compared to CE. The optimal conditions resulting in maximum extraction of phenolic compounds were: Probe diameter of 22 mm, amplitude 90% and extraction time for Vranac wine lees 1500 s and for Merlot wine lees extraction time of 1361 s. UAE proved to be significantly more effective in enhancing the extraction capacity of trans-resveratrol glucoside (30.57% to 300%), trans-resveratrol (36.36% to 45.75%), quercetin (39.94% to 43.83%), kaempferol (65.13% to 72.73%), petunidin-3-glucoside (41.53% to 64.95%), malvidin-3-glucoside (47.63% to 89.17%), malvidin-3-(6-O-acetyl) glucoside (23.84% to 49.74%), and malvidin-3-(6-O-p-coumaroyl) glucoside (26.77% to 34.93%) as compared to CE. Ultrasound reduced the extraction time (2.5-fold) and showed an increase of antioxidant potential by 76.39% (DPPH) and 125.83% (FRAP) compared to CE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7230992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72309922020-05-22 Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees Dujmić, Filip Kovačević Ganić, Karin Ćurić, Duska Karlović, Sven Bosiljkov, Tomislav Ježek, Damir Vidrih, Rajko Hribar, Janez Zlatić, Emil Prusina, Tihomir Khubber, Sucheta Barba, Francisco J. Brnčić, Mladen Foods Article This study presents the results of conventional aqueous (CE) and non-conventional ultrasound-assisted (UAE) extractions of polyphenolic compounds from lees extracts of red wine varieties (Merlot and Vranac). The effect of ultrasound extraction time (t, s), and amplitude (A,%) from a 400 W ultrasound processor with different ultrasonic probes diameters (Ds, mm) on the amount and profile of polyphenolic compounds in the obtained extracts was investigated and compared to CE. The optimal conditions resulting in maximum extraction of phenolic compounds were: Probe diameter of 22 mm, amplitude 90% and extraction time for Vranac wine lees 1500 s and for Merlot wine lees extraction time of 1361 s. UAE proved to be significantly more effective in enhancing the extraction capacity of trans-resveratrol glucoside (30.57% to 300%), trans-resveratrol (36.36% to 45.75%), quercetin (39.94% to 43.83%), kaempferol (65.13% to 72.73%), petunidin-3-glucoside (41.53% to 64.95%), malvidin-3-glucoside (47.63% to 89.17%), malvidin-3-(6-O-acetyl) glucoside (23.84% to 49.74%), and malvidin-3-(6-O-p-coumaroyl) glucoside (26.77% to 34.93%) as compared to CE. Ultrasound reduced the extraction time (2.5-fold) and showed an increase of antioxidant potential by 76.39% (DPPH) and 125.83% (FRAP) compared to CE. MDPI 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7230992/ /pubmed/32283874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040472 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dujmić, Filip Kovačević Ganić, Karin Ćurić, Duska Karlović, Sven Bosiljkov, Tomislav Ježek, Damir Vidrih, Rajko Hribar, Janez Zlatić, Emil Prusina, Tihomir Khubber, Sucheta Barba, Francisco J. Brnčić, Mladen Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title | Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title_full | Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title_fullStr | Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title_short | Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees |
title_sort | non-thermal ultrasonic extraction of polyphenolic compounds from red wine lees |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9040472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dujmicfilip nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT kovacevicganickarin nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT curicduska nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT karlovicsven nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT bosiljkovtomislav nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT jezekdamir nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT vidrihrajko nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT hribarjanez nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT zlaticemil nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT prusinatihomir nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT khubbersucheta nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT barbafranciscoj nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees AT brncicmladen nonthermalultrasonicextractionofpolyphenoliccompoundsfromredwinelees |