Cargando…
Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Our aim is to present the current position of mobile health (mHealth) and the delivery of healthcare services via mobile communication devices in urology. We conducted a literature review of urology mHealth papers on PubMed. Results indicate that mHealth is becoming ubiquitous in contemporary health...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32260206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041016 |
_version_ | 1783535131447787520 |
---|---|
author | Pereira Azevedo, Nuno Gravas, Stavros de la Rosette, Jean |
author_facet | Pereira Azevedo, Nuno Gravas, Stavros de la Rosette, Jean |
author_sort | Pereira Azevedo, Nuno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim is to present the current position of mobile health (mHealth) and the delivery of healthcare services via mobile communication devices in urology. We conducted a literature review of urology mHealth papers on PubMed. Results indicate that mHealth is becoming ubiquitous in contemporary healthcare systems. Although its potential has been shown, urology lags behind other areas, representing just 0.1% of the 300,000 available medical apps in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Furthermore, there is a lack of expert healthcare professional involvement in app development. To avoid harm, it is critical that the scientific accuracy, patient privacy, and user safety of urology mHealth applications are assured. This is because there is no globally enforced medical app regulation, compulsory scientific guidelines, nor mandatory industry standards. Urologists, either individually or via scientific organizations, should have a pivotal position in the design, development, review, certification, and recommendation of apps. mHealth holds great potential in urology, as it can aid multiple stakeholders: citizens, patients, healthcare professionals, health organizations, and public authorities (e.g., Ministry of Health). Even though it is mostly used to improve existing medical activities at present, the future will include revolutionary and ground-breaking technology solutions. This innovative field should be seen by urologists as an opportunity to provide greater care to our patients and better tools and knowledge to our peers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7231179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72311792020-05-22 Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Pereira Azevedo, Nuno Gravas, Stavros de la Rosette, Jean J Clin Med Review Our aim is to present the current position of mobile health (mHealth) and the delivery of healthcare services via mobile communication devices in urology. We conducted a literature review of urology mHealth papers on PubMed. Results indicate that mHealth is becoming ubiquitous in contemporary healthcare systems. Although its potential has been shown, urology lags behind other areas, representing just 0.1% of the 300,000 available medical apps in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Furthermore, there is a lack of expert healthcare professional involvement in app development. To avoid harm, it is critical that the scientific accuracy, patient privacy, and user safety of urology mHealth applications are assured. This is because there is no globally enforced medical app regulation, compulsory scientific guidelines, nor mandatory industry standards. Urologists, either individually or via scientific organizations, should have a pivotal position in the design, development, review, certification, and recommendation of apps. mHealth holds great potential in urology, as it can aid multiple stakeholders: citizens, patients, healthcare professionals, health organizations, and public authorities (e.g., Ministry of Health). Even though it is mostly used to improve existing medical activities at present, the future will include revolutionary and ground-breaking technology solutions. This innovative field should be seen by urologists as an opportunity to provide greater care to our patients and better tools and knowledge to our peers. MDPI 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7231179/ /pubmed/32260206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041016 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Pereira Azevedo, Nuno Gravas, Stavros de la Rosette, Jean Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title | Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title_full | Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title_fullStr | Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title_short | Mobile Health in Urology: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
title_sort | mobile health in urology: the good, the bad and the ugly |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32260206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraazevedonuno mobilehealthinurologythegoodthebadandtheugly AT gravasstavros mobilehealthinurologythegoodthebadandtheugly AT delarosettejean mobilehealthinurologythegoodthebadandtheugly |