Cargando…

Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are synthesized using highly reactive reagents, catalysts, and solvents. Some of those persist as impurities in the final product and are genotoxic or carcinogenic. The conventional processes used for API purification and isolation are able to achieve the limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Flávio, Resina, Leonor, Esteves, Teresa, Ferreira, Frederico Castelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10040073
_version_ 1783535177602957312
author Ferreira, Flávio
Resina, Leonor
Esteves, Teresa
Ferreira, Frederico Castelo
author_facet Ferreira, Flávio
Resina, Leonor
Esteves, Teresa
Ferreira, Frederico Castelo
author_sort Ferreira, Flávio
collection PubMed
description Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are synthesized using highly reactive reagents, catalysts, and solvents. Some of those persist as impurities in the final product and are genotoxic or carcinogenic. The conventional processes used for API purification and isolation are able to achieve the limits imposed by regulatory agencies, but at the expense of significant API losses. Here we report the development of a model to aid in the decision of which dedicated purification process, membrane or adsorption, is most suitable for removal of genotoxic impurities (GTIs), according with a small set of key intrinsic parameters. A hybrid process was developed, combining these two unit operations, to be applied when the use of OSN or adsorption alone result on non-acceptable API losses. Membrane solute rejection and solvent flux was used as parameter for OSN. In the case of adsorption, two isotherm models, Langmuir and Freundlich, were considered. The effect of the recirculation stream and amount of adsorber used on the hybrid process was investigated. Case studies were experimentally validated, confirming that combining the two unit operations can reduce API loss from 24.76% in OSN to 9.76% in a hybrid process. Economic and environmental analyses were performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7231377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72313772020-05-22 Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal Ferreira, Flávio Resina, Leonor Esteves, Teresa Ferreira, Frederico Castelo Membranes (Basel) Article Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are synthesized using highly reactive reagents, catalysts, and solvents. Some of those persist as impurities in the final product and are genotoxic or carcinogenic. The conventional processes used for API purification and isolation are able to achieve the limits imposed by regulatory agencies, but at the expense of significant API losses. Here we report the development of a model to aid in the decision of which dedicated purification process, membrane or adsorption, is most suitable for removal of genotoxic impurities (GTIs), according with a small set of key intrinsic parameters. A hybrid process was developed, combining these two unit operations, to be applied when the use of OSN or adsorption alone result on non-acceptable API losses. Membrane solute rejection and solvent flux was used as parameter for OSN. In the case of adsorption, two isotherm models, Langmuir and Freundlich, were considered. The effect of the recirculation stream and amount of adsorber used on the hybrid process was investigated. Case studies were experimentally validated, confirming that combining the two unit operations can reduce API loss from 24.76% in OSN to 9.76% in a hybrid process. Economic and environmental analyses were performed. MDPI 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7231377/ /pubmed/32316155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10040073 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferreira, Flávio
Resina, Leonor
Esteves, Teresa
Ferreira, Frederico Castelo
Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title_full Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title_fullStr Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title_short Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal
title_sort comparison and combination of organic solvent nanofiltration and adsorption processes: a mathematical approach for mitigation of active pharmaceutical ingredient losses during genotoxin removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10040073
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiraflavio comparisonandcombinationoforganicsolventnanofiltrationandadsorptionprocessesamathematicalapproachformitigationofactivepharmaceuticalingredientlossesduringgenotoxinremoval
AT resinaleonor comparisonandcombinationoforganicsolventnanofiltrationandadsorptionprocessesamathematicalapproachformitigationofactivepharmaceuticalingredientlossesduringgenotoxinremoval
AT estevesteresa comparisonandcombinationoforganicsolventnanofiltrationandadsorptionprocessesamathematicalapproachformitigationofactivepharmaceuticalingredientlossesduringgenotoxinremoval
AT ferreirafredericocastelo comparisonandcombinationoforganicsolventnanofiltrationandadsorptionprocessesamathematicalapproachformitigationofactivepharmaceuticalingredientlossesduringgenotoxinremoval