Cargando…

Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands, the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance (GRAS) programme is carried out at Centres for Sexual Health (CSH), which provide care for sexual high-risk populations. However, half of gonorrhoea infections are diagnosed in general practice (GP). We performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Maartje, van Westreenen, Mireille, van Bergen, Jan, van Benthem, Birgit H B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054006
_version_ 1783535191431577600
author Visser, Maartje
van Westreenen, Mireille
van Bergen, Jan
van Benthem, Birgit H B
author_facet Visser, Maartje
van Westreenen, Mireille
van Bergen, Jan
van Benthem, Birgit H B
author_sort Visser, Maartje
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands, the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance (GRAS) programme is carried out at Centres for Sexual Health (CSH), which provide care for sexual high-risk populations. However, half of gonorrhoea infections are diagnosed in general practice (GP). We performed a pilot study to explore expanding GRAS to GPs using laboratory-based surveillance. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance patterns of GP and CSH patients were compared. METHODS: Three laboratories from different regions were included, which all perform gonorrhoea diagnostics for GPs and used ESwab for patient sampling. Additional culturing for all GP patients with gonorrhoea took place from February to July 2018. After positive PCR-nucleic acid amplification test, residual ESwab material was used for culture. In positive cultures, susceptibility testing was performed for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone using Etest. RESULTS: During the study period, 484 samples were put in culture. 16.5% of cultures were positive (n=80). Antimicrobial resistance levels were low, with 2.6% resistance to azithromycin, 21.5% to ciprofloxacin and 0.0% to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. Resistance levels in CSH GRAS data (first half of 2018) were 19.2% for azithromycin, 31.5% for ciprofloxacin, 1.9% for cefotaxime and 0.0% for ceftriaxone. CONCLUSIONS: Culture positivity rates for GP patients were low, probably due to long transportation times and awaiting PCR test results before attempting culture. Positivity rates might be improved by making changes in sampling and/or transportation methods, but that would require involvement of GPs and patients instead of keeping the surveillance lab based. Resistance levels appeared to be lower at GPs than at the CSH, indicating that resistance might emerge first in more high-risk populations. It is important to consider all potentially relevant patient populations when establishing a gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme. However, based on the findings from this study the current GRAS programme will not be extended to GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7231444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72314442020-05-18 Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study Visser, Maartje van Westreenen, Mireille van Bergen, Jan van Benthem, Birgit H B Sex Transm Infect Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands, the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance (GRAS) programme is carried out at Centres for Sexual Health (CSH), which provide care for sexual high-risk populations. However, half of gonorrhoea infections are diagnosed in general practice (GP). We performed a pilot study to explore expanding GRAS to GPs using laboratory-based surveillance. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance patterns of GP and CSH patients were compared. METHODS: Three laboratories from different regions were included, which all perform gonorrhoea diagnostics for GPs and used ESwab for patient sampling. Additional culturing for all GP patients with gonorrhoea took place from February to July 2018. After positive PCR-nucleic acid amplification test, residual ESwab material was used for culture. In positive cultures, susceptibility testing was performed for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone using Etest. RESULTS: During the study period, 484 samples were put in culture. 16.5% of cultures were positive (n=80). Antimicrobial resistance levels were low, with 2.6% resistance to azithromycin, 21.5% to ciprofloxacin and 0.0% to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. Resistance levels in CSH GRAS data (first half of 2018) were 19.2% for azithromycin, 31.5% for ciprofloxacin, 1.9% for cefotaxime and 0.0% for ceftriaxone. CONCLUSIONS: Culture positivity rates for GP patients were low, probably due to long transportation times and awaiting PCR test results before attempting culture. Positivity rates might be improved by making changes in sampling and/or transportation methods, but that would require involvement of GPs and patients instead of keeping the surveillance lab based. Resistance levels appeared to be lower at GPs than at the CSH, indicating that resistance might emerge first in more high-risk populations. It is important to consider all potentially relevant patient populations when establishing a gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme. However, based on the findings from this study the current GRAS programme will not be extended to GPs. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7231444/ /pubmed/31040250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054006 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Visser, Maartje
van Westreenen, Mireille
van Bergen, Jan
van Benthem, Birgit H B
Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title_full Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title_fullStr Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title_short Low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
title_sort low gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance and culture positivity rates in general practice: a pilot study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054006
work_keys_str_mv AT vissermaartje lowgonorrhoeaantimicrobialresistanceandculturepositivityratesingeneralpracticeapilotstudy
AT vanwestreenenmireille lowgonorrhoeaantimicrobialresistanceandculturepositivityratesingeneralpracticeapilotstudy
AT vanbergenjan lowgonorrhoeaantimicrobialresistanceandculturepositivityratesingeneralpracticeapilotstudy
AT vanbenthembirgithb lowgonorrhoeaantimicrobialresistanceandculturepositivityratesingeneralpracticeapilotstudy