Cargando…

Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study

Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendes, Mariana Esposito, de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes, Hwang, Suy, Giorgio, Marina Di, de Lima, Fabiana Farias, Santos, Neide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32105287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370
_version_ 1783535210881613824
author Mendes, Mariana Esposito
de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes
Hwang, Suy
Giorgio, Marina Di
de Lima, Fabiana Farias
Santos, Neide
author_facet Mendes, Mariana Esposito
de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes
Hwang, Suy
Giorgio, Marina Di
de Lima, Fabiana Farias
Santos, Neide
author_sort Mendes, Mariana Esposito
collection PubMed
description Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose rates and whether they vary in terms of dose estimation. For that we did a search in the literature of all calibration curves produced with low dose rates and we simulated the dose estimation from pre-established dicentric’s frequencies. The information on methodologies and cytogenetic results of each study were analyzed. As expected dose rate influence β coefficients, especially at higher doses. However, we have seen that some doses were not statistically different but they should be, because there is a significant association between the productions of dicentrics and dose rate. This comparative study reinforced the robustness of the dicentric assay and its importance in biological dosimetry. We also emphasized that the dose rate was an important factor in dose estimations. Thus, intercomparison exercises should take into account the dose rates of the participating laboratories, because the dose rates might explain why some results of estimated doses fall outside the recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7231543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72315432020-05-29 Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study Mendes, Mariana Esposito de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes Hwang, Suy Giorgio, Marina Di de Lima, Fabiana Farias Santos, Neide Genet Mol Biol Human and Medical Genetics Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose rates and whether they vary in terms of dose estimation. For that we did a search in the literature of all calibration curves produced with low dose rates and we simulated the dose estimation from pre-established dicentric’s frequencies. The information on methodologies and cytogenetic results of each study were analyzed. As expected dose rate influence β coefficients, especially at higher doses. However, we have seen that some doses were not statistically different but they should be, because there is a significant association between the productions of dicentrics and dose rate. This comparative study reinforced the robustness of the dicentric assay and its importance in biological dosimetry. We also emphasized that the dose rate was an important factor in dose estimations. Thus, intercomparison exercises should take into account the dose rates of the participating laboratories, because the dose rates might explain why some results of estimated doses fall outside the recommendations. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7231543/ /pubmed/32105287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370 Text en Copyright © 2020, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (type CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Human and Medical Genetics
Mendes, Mariana Esposito
de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes
Hwang, Suy
Giorgio, Marina Di
de Lima, Fabiana Farias
Santos, Neide
Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title_full Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title_fullStr Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title_short Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
title_sort calibration curves by (60)co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
topic Human and Medical Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32105287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370
work_keys_str_mv AT mendesmarianaesposito calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy
AT demendoncajulyanneconceicaogoes calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy
AT hwangsuy calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy
AT giorgiomarinadi calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy
AT delimafabianafarias calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy
AT santosneide calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy