Cargando…
Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32105287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370 |
_version_ | 1783535210881613824 |
---|---|
author | Mendes, Mariana Esposito de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes Hwang, Suy Giorgio, Marina Di de Lima, Fabiana Farias Santos, Neide |
author_facet | Mendes, Mariana Esposito de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes Hwang, Suy Giorgio, Marina Di de Lima, Fabiana Farias Santos, Neide |
author_sort | Mendes, Mariana Esposito |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose rates and whether they vary in terms of dose estimation. For that we did a search in the literature of all calibration curves produced with low dose rates and we simulated the dose estimation from pre-established dicentric’s frequencies. The information on methodologies and cytogenetic results of each study were analyzed. As expected dose rate influence β coefficients, especially at higher doses. However, we have seen that some doses were not statistically different but they should be, because there is a significant association between the productions of dicentrics and dose rate. This comparative study reinforced the robustness of the dicentric assay and its importance in biological dosimetry. We also emphasized that the dose rate was an important factor in dose estimations. Thus, intercomparison exercises should take into account the dose rates of the participating laboratories, because the dose rates might explain why some results of estimated doses fall outside the recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7231543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72315432020-05-29 Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study Mendes, Mariana Esposito de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes Hwang, Suy Giorgio, Marina Di de Lima, Fabiana Farias Santos, Neide Genet Mol Biol Human and Medical Genetics Biological dosimetry aims to estimate individual absorbed doses due ionizing radiation exposure. The dicentric chromosomes are considered the most specific biomarker for dose estimation. This study aimed to compare calibration curves for linear low energy transfer (LET) radiation built from low dose rates and whether they vary in terms of dose estimation. For that we did a search in the literature of all calibration curves produced with low dose rates and we simulated the dose estimation from pre-established dicentric’s frequencies. The information on methodologies and cytogenetic results of each study were analyzed. As expected dose rate influence β coefficients, especially at higher doses. However, we have seen that some doses were not statistically different but they should be, because there is a significant association between the productions of dicentrics and dose rate. This comparative study reinforced the robustness of the dicentric assay and its importance in biological dosimetry. We also emphasized that the dose rate was an important factor in dose estimations. Thus, intercomparison exercises should take into account the dose rates of the participating laboratories, because the dose rates might explain why some results of estimated doses fall outside the recommendations. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7231543/ /pubmed/32105287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370 Text en Copyright © 2020, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (type CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Human and Medical Genetics Mendes, Mariana Esposito de Mendonça, Julyanne Conceição Goes Hwang, Suy Giorgio, Marina Di de Lima, Fabiana Farias Santos, Neide Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title | Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title_full | Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title_short | Calibration curves by (60)Co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
title_sort | calibration curves by (60)co with low dose rate are
different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study |
topic | Human and Medical Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32105287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mendesmarianaesposito calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy AT demendoncajulyanneconceicaogoes calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy AT hwangsuy calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy AT giorgiomarinadi calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy AT delimafabianafarias calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy AT santosneide calibrationcurvesby60cowithlowdoseratearedifferentintermsofdoseestimationacomparativestudy |