Cargando…
Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693 |
_version_ | 1783535299710681088 |
---|---|
author | Januszewicz, Wladyslaw Kaminski, Michal F. |
author_facet | Januszewicz, Wladyslaw Kaminski, Michal F. |
author_sort | Januszewicz, Wladyslaw |
collection | PubMed |
description | Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in neoplasia detection, UGI endoscopy remains a highly operator-dependent procedure, characterized by a substantial rate of missed pathology. Despite an overall lack of high-quality performance measures, there is an increased level of awareness about the need for quality control of this procedure, which is reflected in several guidelines and position statements published in recent years. It is widely recognized that quality assessment should go beyond mere technical aspects of the examination, and include both pre- and post-procedural factors. By this means, quality control encompasses the entire patient experience with the health care provider, from appropriate indication and physical assessment, through high-quality endoscopy service, to appropriate follow up and patient satisfaction. This article aims to review the available and emerging quality metrics for UGI endoscopy, taken mostly from Western endoscopy societies, with references to Asian recommendations where appropriate. The paper is limited solely to diagnostic UGI endoscopy and does not include performance measures for therapeutic procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7232050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72320502020-05-29 Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Januszewicz, Wladyslaw Kaminski, Michal F. Therap Adv Gastroenterol Review Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in neoplasia detection, UGI endoscopy remains a highly operator-dependent procedure, characterized by a substantial rate of missed pathology. Despite an overall lack of high-quality performance measures, there is an increased level of awareness about the need for quality control of this procedure, which is reflected in several guidelines and position statements published in recent years. It is widely recognized that quality assessment should go beyond mere technical aspects of the examination, and include both pre- and post-procedural factors. By this means, quality control encompasses the entire patient experience with the health care provider, from appropriate indication and physical assessment, through high-quality endoscopy service, to appropriate follow up and patient satisfaction. This article aims to review the available and emerging quality metrics for UGI endoscopy, taken mostly from Western endoscopy societies, with references to Asian recommendations where appropriate. The paper is limited solely to diagnostic UGI endoscopy and does not include performance measures for therapeutic procedures. SAGE Publications 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7232050/ /pubmed/32477426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Januszewicz, Wladyslaw Kaminski, Michal F. Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title | Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
title_full | Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
title_short | Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
title_sort | quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT januszewiczwladyslaw qualityindicatorsindiagnosticuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT kaminskimichalf qualityindicatorsindiagnosticuppergastrointestinalendoscopy |