Cargando…

Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Januszewicz, Wladyslaw, Kaminski, Michal F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693
_version_ 1783535299710681088
author Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
Kaminski, Michal F.
author_facet Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
Kaminski, Michal F.
author_sort Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
collection PubMed
description Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in neoplasia detection, UGI endoscopy remains a highly operator-dependent procedure, characterized by a substantial rate of missed pathology. Despite an overall lack of high-quality performance measures, there is an increased level of awareness about the need for quality control of this procedure, which is reflected in several guidelines and position statements published in recent years. It is widely recognized that quality assessment should go beyond mere technical aspects of the examination, and include both pre- and post-procedural factors. By this means, quality control encompasses the entire patient experience with the health care provider, from appropriate indication and physical assessment, through high-quality endoscopy service, to appropriate follow up and patient satisfaction. This article aims to review the available and emerging quality metrics for UGI endoscopy, taken mostly from Western endoscopy societies, with references to Asian recommendations where appropriate. The paper is limited solely to diagnostic UGI endoscopy and does not include performance measures for therapeutic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7232050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72320502020-05-29 Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Januszewicz, Wladyslaw Kaminski, Michal F. Therap Adv Gastroenterol Review Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy contributes a major clinical service with consistently growing demand around the world. Its utility corresponds to varying epidemiological issues throughout the globe, with cancer screening and surveillance being of the utmost priority. Despite high accuracy in neoplasia detection, UGI endoscopy remains a highly operator-dependent procedure, characterized by a substantial rate of missed pathology. Despite an overall lack of high-quality performance measures, there is an increased level of awareness about the need for quality control of this procedure, which is reflected in several guidelines and position statements published in recent years. It is widely recognized that quality assessment should go beyond mere technical aspects of the examination, and include both pre- and post-procedural factors. By this means, quality control encompasses the entire patient experience with the health care provider, from appropriate indication and physical assessment, through high-quality endoscopy service, to appropriate follow up and patient satisfaction. This article aims to review the available and emerging quality metrics for UGI endoscopy, taken mostly from Western endoscopy societies, with references to Asian recommendations where appropriate. The paper is limited solely to diagnostic UGI endoscopy and does not include performance measures for therapeutic procedures. SAGE Publications 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7232050/ /pubmed/32477426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
Kaminski, Michal F.
Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916693
work_keys_str_mv AT januszewiczwladyslaw qualityindicatorsindiagnosticuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT kaminskimichalf qualityindicatorsindiagnosticuppergastrointestinalendoscopy