Cargando…

Elevation of the renal threshold for glucose is associated with insulin resistance and higher glycated hemoglobin levels

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The renal threshold for glucose (RTg) corresponds to a blood glucose level of ~180 mg/dL; however, in hospitals, patients are often encountered who are hyperglycemic, but urine glucose test strip‐negative, who remain negative for urine glucose even at blood glucose concentrations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hieshima, Kunio, Sugiyama, Seigo, Yoshida, Akira, Kurinami, Noboru, Suzuki, Tomoko, Ijima, Hiroko, Miyamoto, Fumio, Kajiwara, Keizo, Jinnouchi, Katsunori, Jinnouchi, Tomio, Jinnouchi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31770476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13191
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The renal threshold for glucose (RTg) corresponds to a blood glucose level of ~180 mg/dL; however, in hospitals, patients are often encountered who are hyperglycemic, but urine glucose test strip‐negative, who remain negative for urine glucose even at blood glucose concentrations >180 mg/dL, implying a high RTg value. In this study, we aimed to identify factors determining high RTg in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated RTg (eRTg) using urinalysis data from 67 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients for whom the glucose infusion rate (GIR) was determined by hyperinsulinemic‐euglycemic clamp. After allocating patients to two groups according to their baseline eRTg (<180 mg/dL or ≥180 mg/dL), we identified the factors affecting eRTg using simple and multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: GIR, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin use and dyslipidemia differed significantly between the groups. In simple regression analysis, GIR, HbA1c, body muscle‐to‐fat ratio and insulin use were significantly correlated with eRTg; and in multiple regression analysis, GIR and HbA1c remained independent negative and positive determinants, respectively, with the contribution of GIR being substantial. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, when GIR <5.7 was used as the insulin resistance threshold, the cut‐off value of eRTg was 189 mg/dL (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, in receiver operating characteristic analysis using eRTg ≥189 mg/dL, the cut‐off value for HbA1c was 8.0% (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: High eRTg is associated with low GIR and high HbA1c, with GIR making a substantial contribution.